Militant Vegans attack customers

Post Reply New Topic

well what do they not want me to eat?
cows.
sheep.
chickens.
fish (i am sure they have a mental rapport with fish in particular)

so what if, as a truce, we offer them a koala casserole, or a porpoise pie, or devilled dolphin toasties?
they need the iron.

it would be funny if the whole group of protesters went missing and the mystery was eventually solved.

headline: DNA of missing vegan protesters found in the feces of cannibal cult.

Cyber dad

The dictionary defines "terrorism" as "the unlawful use of violence or intimidation" for "political cause"

Something like that

It sounded like intimidation and a political cause

But it did not sound "unlawful"

Unless you claim they caused a "public nuisance"


So no it is not "terrorism"

But it is a "public nuisance"




That reminds me last week at Berkeley Animal Rights Center, an off leash dog had the nerve to bite my pants. It is a fine line if the dog bit just my pants or bit my worthless corpse

And I screamed

Someone had the nerve to tell me, to leave

"We don't treat animals like that! Animal Rights!"

The dog had a "right" to bark and bite, and I had no"right" to scream (or bite)

Wtf?

The reason why I was in there was to buy food

Yes they sell food

Legally it might be illegal to have a dog off leash in a building that sells food

But off leash dogs is illegal too and precious lil "people" do it all the time

Self righteous

Self important

They act like the dog is their daemon



The owners are so annoying and entitled

Cyber dad

What the customers were doing was legal (granted)

But what laws did the militant vegans break?

Public nuisance? "Disruption of peace"? Harassment?

If the militant vegans broke one or more laws in that situation, then, yes it is terrorism

However merely being self rightoueus, self important, disrespectful, rude, annoying ass holes , is

not illegal. If the vegans did not break one or more specific laws, then that is not "terrorism". According to the definition that I quoted in the above statement

Completely disagree , nothing wrong with these "militant vegans" They are defending the voiceless . Here I am surrounded by rational and allegedly intelligent autistics yet I see so many meat eating autistics. Meat harms animals , it harms the planet and it harms YOU ! Why do it , Meat increases your risk of cancer plant based foods reduce it , FACT .

" Does this constitute terrorism " No , eating animals is terrorism . Just like terrorists you are killing for no logical reason , The 9-11 terrorists killed and what did they achieve ... NOTHING . What did you achieve by eating a animal?

I mean really ? Vegans go into restaurant and they are the terrorists ? What are meat eater in the eyes of animals ?

No offense (when people say this they do want to cause offense !) I do question the superior intellect of us autistics when I read these vegan threads on this website .

^^^^^

They could be run of the mill nt's who are responding in ways that I don't approve of

Aussiebloke I agree with veganism being a superior lifestyle choice and it's a no brainer that it's better for people's health and for the planet

I just don't think protesting against families trying to eat a meal is the way to go...

if the great joojoo had not intended for us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?