ironpony wrote:
Especially after they already had him in the police car, and then choose to remove him from the car and choke him.
Actually, looking at the bodycam footage, they didn't remove him from the vehicle...
From around 9:30 - 10:00 in the bodycam footage at
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8614589/First-length-bodycam-footage-shows-George-Floyds-harrowing-final-moments-brutal-arrest.html you can see the officers trying to push him into the back of the car, which he is resisting. One of the officers has opened the door on the other side to try and help drag him in, and he uses his foot to propel himself across the seat and out the other side.
He then asks to be allowed to lie on the ground, which the officers allow, using a restraint method which they had been instructed to use.
The pressure on his neck also appears to have been minimal, given that (as I recall) no bruising\tissue damage (which would have been expected were he choked) was found in either autopsy. The knee appears to be "resting" against him, with no weight\pressure applied, but with the ability to apply pressure (and subsequent tissue damage\bruising) should he have tried to move from the position.
Choking him (besides leaving tissue damage\bruising) would have affected his ability to speak (exhaling) to the same degree it would have affected inhalation, and his voice does not appear to provide any indication of this. Other possible reasons for his inability to breathe may have been pressure on his back causing problems with his diaphram (preventing breathing\restricting lung capacity\expansion), or the effect of the drugs (which were found to be at a fatal level in his bloodstream) coupled with the stress\anxiety involved in his arrest.