beneficii wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
Yes, only hardcore puritanical right-wing fanatics would ever suggest tits are arousing.
That's not the core of Ezra's argument. What he was arguing was that the citation and the neighbor's action in reporting her to police were justified:
Quote:
Okay well let's break it down.
The neighbor sees indecent exposure.
So the neighbor phones the police to report indecent exposure taking place.
The police don't say "that's not indecent exposure" or "you should mind your own business" etc. They presumably say "thank you for letting us know, we'll dispatche an officer to check it out. And then the officer issues a citation for indecent exposure.
The neighbor was simply doing their civic duty to the best of their knowledge.
And, regarding the idea that we might tolerate women for going topless:
Quote:
I think it's absolutely egregious. The downfall of western society. Sodom and Gomorrah all over again.
You honestly took that seriously

Well now your level of perception or lack thereof has been clearly demonstrated. Kraftiekortie got it, Fnord got it, Magz got it, Wolfman87 got it.
beneficii wrote:
Plus, he has been constantly trying to derail the thread from its original subject, threats against the woman, which suggests he does not think it worthy of discussion to begin with.
Subject title of thread:

Which never happened.