Milo resigns from Breitbart over underage sex comments
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
EzraS wrote:
It will be interesting to see what the experts manage convince the liberal world into believing next regarding sexuality and orientation. What's acceptable, normal, harmless and likely will even more directly involve children being a part of it.
If by that you mean sex education, then liberals favor that. Blue states have lower rates of teen pregnancy and STIs than red states. The difference, even within Texas, in the sense of personal responsibility between Austin and small town West Texas, shocked me. The men in San Angelo felt anxious about going into Planned Parenthood to pick up free condoms. A lot of people just didn't care for them, or about the consequences. In Austin, people generally talked about talking about sexual history and did their level best to avoid conceiving unintentionally, with a few troubled exceptions.
Most sexual abuse happens in the home, and most of it is done by people in or known to the family. Look into the legislation protecting people from domestic abuse of all sorts, and you will quickly learn who has supported it and who has opposed it.
California has some of the toughest restrictions for sex offender registrants in the world. Mostly, they have to live under certain specific bridges to stay far away from literally everything. Some people point out that the policy will cause more problems, but most CALIFORNIANS say let them die a miserable death, or words to that effect. The sexually promiscuous, porn producing, Nancy Pelosi electing Californians.
Random strangers who want to abduct kids exist, but they are over-represented in crime dramas and news reports. That's probably because psychopathic sexual sadists are f*****g terrifying, for real, even to adults. Everyone wants to crack down on them, except of course the scientists who would prefer to study them.
Given that in reality, it's a familial problem, as it was in Eldorado, TX with those polygamists, the laws strengthening protection against domestic violence will reduce actual harm more.
Democrats support them, and Republicans generally oppose them. Your argument that liberals want to exploit children does not hold water.
_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade
kraftiekortie wrote:
I don't think most people know about the 63 "genders."
I didn't know too much about them until recently.
Most people think of themselves as either a man or a woman, though they don't always follow, to the letter, the supposed gender roles. I'm a mostly masculine man---but I can have some "feminine" interests sometimes. The fact of my "feminine" interests doesn't make me less of a "man."
Of course, a person can be an hermaphrodite if they bear the sex characteristics of both genders; it would be unfair to deny them the right to declare themselves of that "gender," if they so desire. It doesn't make them less of a person.
Men and women run the gamut of characteristics---from ultra-feminine men, to ultra-masculine women. It doesn't make them less of a "man" or a "woman."
If a man wants to be thought of as being a "woman," I give the man that choice, and vice versa.
But it is still rare, in this society, to not fall within the "binary" system. But if somebody wants to think of themselves as "nonbinary," what's to stop them?
I don't find all this to be indicative of a declining morality in our society.
I didn't know too much about them until recently.
Most people think of themselves as either a man or a woman, though they don't always follow, to the letter, the supposed gender roles. I'm a mostly masculine man---but I can have some "feminine" interests sometimes. The fact of my "feminine" interests doesn't make me less of a "man."
Of course, a person can be an hermaphrodite if they bear the sex characteristics of both genders; it would be unfair to deny them the right to declare themselves of that "gender," if they so desire. It doesn't make them less of a person.
Men and women run the gamut of characteristics---from ultra-feminine men, to ultra-masculine women. It doesn't make them less of a "man" or a "woman."
If a man wants to be thought of as being a "woman," I give the man that choice, and vice versa.
But it is still rare, in this society, to not fall within the "binary" system. But if somebody wants to think of themselves as "nonbinary," what's to stop them?
I don't find all this to be indicative of a declining morality in our society.
Everyone who uses Facebook knows about it, as FB offers that many (or close to it) gender selections.
As do many other social media websites used by kids.
And I wouldn't be surprised if it's being taught to 12 year olds in public schools.
As long as somebody doesn't sponge off me, or try to take advantage of me, or doesn't let me have my say, I don't really care what "gender" a person is.
I feel we have to emphasize morality in our society. An infusion of some old-fashioned morals and ethics is hardly ever a bad thing.
As long as a person of whatever "gender" treats people like they want to be treated, I don't care what "gender" that person is.
As for my mate, though, I would, definitely, prefer a rather conventionally feminine woman (but not somebody who is drowning in femininity).
