03 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
beneficii wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
We have the transcript of the call.
There was no pressure.
He never asked for help for is 2020 campaign.
He simply asked the president of Ukraine to look into Biden's suspicious activity of getting a prosecutor removed.
Now, maybe that's a crime.
We need an updated video of Judge N.
(I will search for it)
There was no pressure.
He never asked for help for is 2020 campaign.
He simply asked the president of Ukraine to look into Biden's suspicious activity of getting a prosecutor removed.
Now, maybe that's a crime.
We need an updated video of Judge N.
(I will search for it)
Way ahead of you:
This was good to know what the full accusation is.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
03 Oct 2019, 7:11 pm
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
And what is the military aid for? For the regime in Ukraine's benefit against Russia. Why did Trump give Russia's enemy money to fight Russia? 
To counter the fake claim that he is a tool of the Kremlin.
To counter the fake claim that he is a tool of the Kremlin.It was congress that had allotted those funds to Ukraine. If it was up to Trump, we'd probably be sending aid to Russia.
That's B.S again. Obama blocked it but Trump allowed it. And you STILL push the Russiagate hoax. So no, I would never change your mind especially as you've shown you still push a hoax even after it's been proven as a conspiracy theory and the whole thing fell apart. So get lost. I'm not debating this issue any longer as it's a waste of my time. I'll just be glad to gloat when it all falls apart and Trump gets relected. Cause the corrupted DNC would stop Tulsi.
Only on the Bizarro planet. Both Dems and GOPers were perplexed as to why Trump was withholding funds meant to go to Ukrainian defense against Russia. Now we know why.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
03 Oct 2019, 7:12 pm
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Defending a person's lies on top of lies just because they are tribal to a party is utterly pathetic.
I don't need a chill pill or to get laid. Stop defending f**king liars and stop making strawman arguments.
I don't need a chill pill or to get laid. Stop defending f**king liars and stop making strawman arguments.
Said the pot to the kettle.
I'm supporting Tulsi Gabbard. I support no party. Literally everything you say is wrong. Maybe it's not me who needs pills.
Well, until you switch citizenship, your support means squat.
From the guy who pushed the Russiagate hoax for 3 years
You don't seem to understand how the internet works. I can change people's minds (when they are open) and try to convince Americans to vote for her rather than any of the other terrible candidates.How many minds have you changed on WP?
It's like you are basically trying to gatekeep because he isn't an American. Which is funny because a member who's like your best friend here who posts tons of stuff about American politics and candidates as if trying to be persuasive isn't an American either.
No, I'm just suggesting Powell isn't the mind changer he might believe himself to be. For the record, I certainly am no such thing, either.
I never said Powell or cyberdad weren't entitled to express their opinions, but just the same neither of them can take part in making the final choice in choosing the leaders of America.
And yet you have gone along with the claim that Russsians posting to the internet significantly influenced American voters.
Yes, because they were NT intelligence professionals carrying out mind games meant to divide America for the hope of crippling our country's system of free government, and getting an easily manipulated, vain buffoon into the White House.
So one has to be an NT intelligence professional to influence people on the internet.
How then did Powell influence me to look into Tulsi Gabbard which will end up in me likely voting for her if she is on the ballot?
In order to influence masses of people on the internet? Yes.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
03 Oct 2019, 7:14 pm
03 Oct 2019, 7:48 pm
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Defending a person's lies on top of lies just because they are tribal to a party is utterly pathetic.
I don't need a chill pill or to get laid. Stop defending f**king liars and stop making strawman arguments.
I don't need a chill pill or to get laid. Stop defending f**king liars and stop making strawman arguments.
Said the pot to the kettle.
I'm supporting Tulsi Gabbard. I support no party. Literally everything you say is wrong. Maybe it's not me who needs pills.
Well, until you switch citizenship, your support means squat.
From the guy who pushed the Russiagate hoax for 3 years
You don't seem to understand how the internet works. I can change people's minds (when they are open) and try to convince Americans to vote for her rather than any of the other terrible candidates.How many minds have you changed on WP?
To be fair how many of us have changed any minds on WP?
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
03 Oct 2019, 7:58 pm
Antrax wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Defending a person's lies on top of lies just because they are tribal to a party is utterly pathetic.
I don't need a chill pill or to get laid. Stop defending f**king liars and stop making strawman arguments.
I don't need a chill pill or to get laid. Stop defending f**king liars and stop making strawman arguments.
Said the pot to the kettle.
I'm supporting Tulsi Gabbard. I support no party. Literally everything you say is wrong. Maybe it's not me who needs pills.
Well, until you switch citizenship, your support means squat.
From the guy who pushed the Russiagate hoax for 3 years
You don't seem to understand how the internet works. I can change people's minds (when they are open) and try to convince Americans to vote for her rather than any of the other terrible candidates.How many minds have you changed on WP?
To be fair how many of us have changed any minds on WP?
MY POINT EXACTLY!
03 Oct 2019, 7:59 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
04 Oct 2019, 12:08 am
04 Oct 2019, 4:14 am
04 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
04 Oct 2019, 2:02 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
04 Oct 2019, 3:31 pm
VegetableMan wrote:
Sadly, the Dems won't go after Trump for real crimes, like sending troops to aid Saudia Arabia, the most brutal regime in the ME.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
As that many Republicans, being the biggest homophobes are also the biggest closet cases, literally do suck.
Last edited by Kraichgauer on 04 Oct 2019, 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
04 Oct 2019, 3:33 pm
04 Oct 2019, 3:52 pm
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Sadly, the Dems won't go after Trump for real crimes, like sending troops to aid Saudia Arabia, the most brutal regime in the ME.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
As that many Republicans, being the biggest homophobes are also the biggest closet cases, literally do suck.
Uhhh...what?
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
04 Oct 2019, 4:25 pm
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Sadly, the Dems won't go after Trump for real crimes, like sending troops to aid Saudia Arabia, the most brutal regime in the ME.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
As that many Republicans, being the biggest homophobes are also the biggest closet cases, literally do suck.
Uhhh...what?
Just commenting on how Republicans can and do really suck.
04 Oct 2019, 4:35 pm
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Sadly, the Dems won't go after Trump for real crimes, like sending troops to aid Saudia Arabia, the most brutal regime in the ME.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
It's just another smokescreen, like Russiagate, to distract the public from real issues, and the fact that Democrats suck.
As that many Republicans, being the biggest homophobes are also the biggest closet cases, literally do suck.
Uhhh...what?
Just commenting on how Republicans can and do really suck.
Yeah, alright. Both parties suck, right? Am I right? Come on, just say it once. "Democrats and Republicans suck!" You can do it, I know you can!
