06 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm
IsabellaLinton wrote:
"Personal attacks.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not."
Please stop making fun of people who are religious (Christian, Jewish, Muslim), people in traditional communities, people who like dresses, people who wear hijabs, people who are sex workers, and other people who have different lifestyles than your own.
Over and out.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not."
Please stop making fun of people who are religious (Christian, Jewish, Muslim), people in traditional communities, people who like dresses, people who wear hijabs, people who are sex workers, and other people who have different lifestyles than your own.
Over and out.
I can say that I disapprove of religions or philosophies that require females to wear coverups like hijabs or burqas because such things can be damaging to women. I can’t say that the people wearing them are bad or stupid (which they obviously aren’t, at least no more than the general population).
I have nothing against people who wear dresses. I own some.
Prostitution is illegal where I live and is going to be for awhile.
Why are you keeping track of what I say?
Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 06 Jan 2020, 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
06 Jan 2020, 5:07 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:11 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:14 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:17 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:25 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:26 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:27 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:31 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:31 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:33 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:34 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:38 pm
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Bravo5150 wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Bravo,
From The Walrus, 08 August 2016
"In recent months, it has become increasingly clear that people are not reading these rules.
As a result, any thread made after this post that breaks these rules in the opening post will be locked, and the user will be formally warned. If a thread contains significant ongoing constructive discussion then the rule break may be edited out of the OP instead.
In particular, please pay attention to the rule banning attacks on groups of people. For avoidance of doubt, here are some contemporary examples which break that rule:
"Trump supporters are idiots"
"Only stupid people would vote for Clinton"
"The left will get upset at this"
"Conservatives get butthurt too easily"
"Feminists are evil" " (end quote)
viewtopic.php?t=204613#p7249308
Names aren't needed. Groups of people are not allowed to be attacked.
From The Walrus, 08 August 2016
"In recent months, it has become increasingly clear that people are not reading these rules.
As a result, any thread made after this post that breaks these rules in the opening post will be locked, and the user will be formally warned. If a thread contains significant ongoing constructive discussion then the rule break may be edited out of the OP instead.
In particular, please pay attention to the rule banning attacks on groups of people. For avoidance of doubt, here are some contemporary examples which break that rule:
"Trump supporters are idiots"
"Only stupid people would vote for Clinton"
"The left will get upset at this"
"Conservatives get butthurt too easily"
"Feminists are evil" " (end quote)
viewtopic.php?t=204613#p7249308
Names aren't needed. Groups of people are not allowed to be attacked.
So, according to what you are interpreting the rules to say, are you saying I would be in violation of the rule if I said that people who lack full respect for their own beliefs don't deserve respect from others about their beliefs?
No. For one, I'm not "interpreting the rules", I'm quoting them. No one has to respect anyone's beliefs. They do need to refrain from mocking or teasing groups of people, saying they "wear tinfoil hats and worship sky gods", joking that religious people may as well pray to their breakfast cereal, saying sex workers shouldn't have rights because it's illegal (but if gay marriage were illegal, that would be OK?), and commenting that religious folk should wipe their arse with the Bible because they aren't "sane" or "rational" and they are among "the worst people" she knows.
I do notice these comments, because I'm shocked that some people can be so rude and insensitive to others.
You are taking what I said WAY further than I meant it. SOME of the very religious people I have personally known have been the worst. That doesn’t encompass all religious people, just some of the very strict people I’ve known - the sticklers for rules, judgment, and such.
Sex workers should have human rights like everyone else but I’m against legalization.
“Tin foil hats” was not referring to religion, nor was “psychics.”
“Breakfast cereal” was about arbitrary rules, NOT prayer.
Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 06 Jan 2020, 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
06 Jan 2020, 5:43 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:48 pm
06 Jan 2020, 5:52 pm
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Abandoning Marriage and Parenting goals PERMANENTLY!!! |
17 Jul 2026, 12:48 pm |
| Abandoning Marriage and Parenting goals PERMANENTLY!!! |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm Guest
|
