renaeden wrote:
Did anyone see that when the Queen met with Liz Truss, she had a large bruise on the back of her hand? Like it almost covered her hand. I thought she might have worn gloves to hide it. But maybe she didn't because she was inside.
I've heard it talked about, looked into it, and found this article dated all the way back in March 2019
"
Queen's purple hand is indicator of SERIOUS arterial health conditionA LARGE purple discolouration covering the Queen’s hand, shown in recent pictures from the palace, is one indicator of serious health concern peripheral cyanosis, which in turn can reveal arterial and blood supply problems.
Royal fans raised fears after the nation’s longest-serving monarch appeared with a deep purple blemish on her hand while welcoming the King and Queen of Jordan to Buckingham Palace earlier this week. Buckingham Palace has refused to say why the Queen’s hand has turned purple bruise but a medical condition called peripheral cyanosis - which refers to a bluish discolouration to your hands and feet – could explain why the 92-year-old’s hand is covered in the huge mark. The condition is usually caused by low oxygen levels in the red blood cells or issues getting oxygenated blood to your body."
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/10 ... al-cyanosiI think that's an incorrect diagnosis because when I looked up images for peripheral cyanosis they showed discoloration of the fingertips. More likely it was a condition called senile purpura.
I'm sure we would all like to be that sharp and lively right up to the end, especially at 96.