Craig28 wrote:
Adolf Hitler was a man who had many faults, society treated him like complete crap, his mother died while he was young (reported weeks ago that it was actually a Jewish doctor who treated his mother at the time of her death). Hitler's behaviour was totallly justified for a man that had mental health issues, and getting many other men to kill millions of Jews and soldiers in camps and battlefields speaks volumes for the actual fear and evil he oozed. There will never be another Hitler, he is one of a kind.
It becomes clear now why you have no concern over the use of his name on small children. You should probably study a little deeper into the subject before you decide that Hitler's actions were at all "justified" regardless of his mental state. Whether his sick mother was treated by a jew or not is completely irrelevant to his later genocide. She was NOT treated by a Slav, a Romany, a Homosexual, a disabled person, or an intellectual who happened to be more intelligent than Adolf, and plenty of all of those went to the camps. Sounds like neo-nazi rightwing apologist BS to me. (And for the record, I already HAVE studied deeply into the subject.)
As for one of a kind: Polpot, Stalin, Mugabe any number of Serbians..I could go on. Mass-murder is not uncommon. Nor are crackpot dictators. The major difference is the degree of severity. It is as much through the work of Hitler and his industrialised Genocide that such an event has not happened again on such a scale, and that generally such behaviour receives short shrift from the rest of the world. Does not make him unique, or even likely to be the last, but it does mean that another "Hitler" is unlikely to cause so much damage.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]