Page 2 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

06 Jul 2011, 10:09 pm

To think if such a conversation as to the proper analysis of the term "gay soldier" was in any other forum other than Wrong Planet, the discussion would turn into an all out flame war of "that's offensive, you suck!" :P



jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

06 Jul 2011, 11:02 pm

raisedbyignorance wrote:
To think if such a conversation as to the proper analysis of the term "gay soldier" was in any other forum other than Wrong Planet, the discussion would turn into an all out flame war of "that's offensive, you suck!" :P


:lol: you have to admit this is a rather bizzare conversation?? expecially since the straight folks are the ones getting offended by my usage of the word "gay"


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


CaroleTucson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 824
Location: Tucson, AZ

07 Jul 2011, 9:10 am

Too bad this heartfelt story about a brave young man got embroiled in childish bickering.



jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

07 Jul 2011, 10:51 pm

CaroleTucson wrote:
Too bad this heartfelt story about a brave young man got embroiled in childish bickering.


I agree totally.


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

08 Jul 2011, 12:23 pm

CaroleTucson wrote:
Too bad this heartfelt story about a brave young man got embroiled in childish bickering.


It is that, "childish bickering" that is responsible for the progress that we are making towards fair, just and equal societies. I regret that the, "love that dare not speak its name," must scream it from the rooftops in order to be heard--but so long as it is necessary, I will continue so to do.


_________________
--James


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Jul 2011, 2:15 am

visagrunt wrote:
CaroleTucson wrote:
Too bad this heartfelt story about a brave young man got embroiled in childish bickering.


It is that, "childish bickering" that is responsible for the progress that we are making towards fair, just and equal societies. I regret that the, "love that dare not speak its name," must scream it from the rooftops in order to be heard--but so long as it is necessary, I will continue so to do.


Scream to you're heard.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,687
Location: Houston, Texas

09 Jul 2011, 11:58 pm

My focus would have been on him being a hero.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Jul 2011, 6:39 am

jojobean wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/07/02/gay.soldier.andrew.wilfahrt/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

its a remarkable story and one that may turn the tables of gay rights

I hope his voice is heard from the grave all the way to capital hill


It would be well if people studied history more carefully. The Spartans who were the greatest land warriors the world has ever produced used homosexual relations between the men to promote bonding in the ranks. At Thermopolea at least 300 heroes (actually there were others too) died and they were homosexual.

ruveyn



jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

10 Jul 2011, 10:40 am

ruveyn wrote:
jojobean wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/07/02/gay.soldier.andrew.wilfahrt/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

its a remarkable story and one that may turn the tables of gay rights

I hope his voice is heard from the grave all the way to capital hill


It would be well if people studied history more carefully. The Spartans who were the greatest land warriors the world has ever produced used homosexual relations between the men to promote bonding in the ranks. At Thermopolea at least 300 heroes (actually there were others too) died and they were homosexual.

ruveyn


Interesting info!!


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm

ruveyn wrote:
jojobean wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/07/02/gay.soldier.andrew.wilfahrt/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

its a remarkable story and one that may turn the tables of gay rights

I hope his voice is heard from the grave all the way to capital hill


It would be well if people studied history more carefully. The Spartans who were the greatest land warriors the world has ever produced used homosexual relations between the men to promote bonding in the ranks. At Thermopolea at least 300 heroes (actually there were others too) died and they were homosexual.

ruveyn


As well, the greatest war leader of all time, Alexander the Great, was a homosexual.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

10 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm

visagrunt wrote:
And your formulation reduces him down to his occupation. All labels are generalizations, "soldier," no less than, "gay."


His occupation was "soldier." He died in a war. It makes a great deal more sense to describe a guy who was employed by the Army to fight in wars, and subsequently died in one, as a "soldier" rather than saying, "Andrew died a hero." I'm still not sure where his sexuality comes in to play.

Quote:
So if your arrangement of labels is less "insulting" than the other, the implication in your statement is that, "gay," is a less worthy label than, "soldier." Can you not see the insult inherent in that implication?


Nope. We could also describe him by his hobbies, or the television shows, his religion, ect. I don't know why his sexuality is more indicative of who he was as a person than the glut of other labels one could use to describe him. Is his race a less worthy label? His religion? His hair color? His weight? His favorite food?

Why not: "Gay, Coffee-drinking, Blonde, Tetris Champion, Former Little League Player Soldier Died a Hero?"

Quote:
By all means. But in return, do me a favour. Don't EVER denigrate my culture by dismissing my being gay as a subordinate characteristic. I like to think that there is more to being gay than who I screw. Thank you.


And I know plenty of gay people who don't believe there is any such thing as a "gay culture," and I know even more who believe there is a gay culture, but want absolutely nothing to do with it.

Quote:
Of course he did. But being gay is not incidental to him--even if it was only part of him, it was still central to his identity and does not deserve to be dismissed as secondary or irrelevant.

Being gay is not the only thing I am. But being gay is never a secondary characteristic. It is as intrinsic to my identity as my AS, my face, my education, my intellect, my tastes, my nationality, my ethnicity, my social network and all the other myriad factors that go into making me the unique individual that I am.


Which still doesn't explain why someone's sexuality is the most important descriptor of said person, which is what you imply by describing someone as "gay" to the exclusion any other characteristic.

Besides, it's stuff like this that casts the whole "equality thing" in a crazy light. If gay soldiers (or whatever minority) wish to be treated "equally," then why would they want to be specifically singled out as "gay soldiers?" Either you're a soldier like everybody else, or you're not. During "Women's History Month," I refuse to participate in any nonsensical ceremonies meant to honor female service members. My predecessors fought too hard to be accepted and treated like everybody else for me to be demanding "special recognition" for the amazing accomplishment of having a vagina while being in the military. Being set apart wouldn't do me, or the fight for female "equality," any good whatsoever.

It baffles me.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

10 Jul 2011, 7:10 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
And your formulation reduces him down to his occupation. All labels are generalizations, "soldier," no less than, "gay."


His occupation was "soldier." He died in a war. It makes a great deal more sense to describe a guy who was employed by the Army to fight in wars, and subsequently died in one, as a "soldier" rather than saying, "Andrew died a hero." I'm still not sure where his sexuality comes in to play.

Quote:
So if your arrangement of labels is less "insulting" than the other, the implication in your statement is that, "gay," is a less worthy label than, "soldier." Can you not see the insult inherent in that implication?


Nope. We could also describe him by his hobbies, or the television shows, his religion, ect. I don't know why his sexuality is more indicative of who he was as a person than the glut of other labels one could use to describe him. Is his race a less worthy label? His religion? His hair color? His weight? His favorite food?

Why not: "Gay, Coffee-drinking, Blonde, Tetris Champion, Former Little League Player Soldier Died a Hero?"

Quote:
By all means. But in return, do me a favour. Don't EVER denigrate my culture by dismissing my being gay as a subordinate characteristic. I like to think that there is more to being gay than who I screw. Thank you.


And I know plenty of gay people who don't believe there is any such thing as a "gay culture," and I know even more who believe there is a gay culture, but want absolutely nothing to do with it.

Quote:
Of course he did. But being gay is not incidental to him--even if it was only part of him, it was still central to his identity and does not deserve to be dismissed as secondary or irrelevant.

Being gay is not the only thing I am. But being gay is never a secondary characteristic. It is as intrinsic to my identity as my AS, my face, my education, my intellect, my tastes, my nationality, my ethnicity, my social network and all the other myriad factors that go into making me the unique individual that I am.


Which still doesn't explain why someone's sexuality is the most important descriptor of said person, which is what you imply by describing someone as "gay" to the exclusion any other characteristic.

Besides, it's stuff like this that casts the whole "equality thing" in a crazy light. If gay soldiers (or whatever minority) wish to be treated "equally," then why would they want to be specifically singled out as "gay soldiers?" Either you're a soldier like everybody else, or you're not. During "Women's History Month," I refuse to participate in any nonsensical ceremonies meant to honor female service members. My predecessors fought too hard to be accepted and treated like everybody else for me to be demanding "special recognition" for the amazing accomplishment of having a vagina while being in the military. Being set apart wouldn't do me, or the fight for female "equality," any good whatsoever.

It baffles me.


I said several times why "Gay" was important in the fact that he died, because his parrents are becoming a powerful voice for gay marraige because they felt as if his country was saying that "he is good enough to die for his country, but not good enough to marry the person he loves." The articles focuses alot on his parrents activism for gay rights after he died...which is why the fact he is gay is very relevant to his death as a soilder. The article is really about gay rights.


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


Ancalagon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302

10 Jul 2011, 8:27 pm

jojobean wrote:
I said several times why "Gay" was important in the fact that he died, because his parrents are becoming a powerful voice for gay marraige

"Gay soldier died a hero; parents campaign for gay marriage" as a title would have made perfect sense.

The article you linked to was titled Soldier leaves legacy much larger than 'he was gay'. The article says about his parents, "They want people to know their son wasn't a 'gay soldier.' He was a great soldier who happened to be gay." It also says that his sister thinks it's the least interesting thing about him.

The article takes a different view than the people that are trying to say that being gay was the only important thing about him.


_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton