aspoid wrote:
it would probably fall under the term 'hate crime'.
which, carries more severe penalties than normal crimes of similar actions.
I see, one of the many new crimes invented by the left. We have that over here, too. If you belong to a politically-unfavoured group and someone insults you, then you just shrug it off and get on with your life. If, however, you belong to a politically-favoured minority you can report the incident and see the perpetrator of the heinous crime at least gets a court hearing, and if you're lucky a prison sentence.
To be honest the people who invented the idea of "hate crimes" are the criminals. They should be strung up. People should be equal in the eyes of the law; clearly in both the US and UK they aren't.
Anyway, in respect of the case under discussion, I don't think "hate crime" was mentioned by the judge — but correct me if I'm wrong.