Americans To Be Tortured For Refusing To Show ID?

Page 2 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

psych
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,488
Location: w london

17 Nov 2006, 7:03 am

likedcalico wrote:
God just show your fricken' IDs. How hard can it be. Plus China isn't a good country to be in anyway. I'll never go there. Why wouldn't someone want to show them their ID? I sure would just to get it over with.


From the UK campaign;
Quote:
Discrimination—no guarantees #
There have been vapid "assurances" made to some minority groups. That underlines the potential for threat. The system offers a ready-made police-state tool for a future government less trustworthy than the current one. A Home Secretary could create classifications of individuals to be registered as he sees fit, introducing onerous duties backed by severe penalties for fractions of the population. Religious or ethnic affiliation, for example, could be added to the Register by regulation—or be inferred by cross-referencing other information using a National Identity Register Number or associated data.

"Papers, please" #
ID cards in practice would provide a pretext for those in authority—public or private—to question individuals who stand out for reasons of personal appearance or demeanour. This is likely to exacerbate divisions in society. The Chairman of the Bar Council has asked, "is there not a great risk that those who feel at the margins of society—the somewhat disaffected—will be driven into the arms of extremists?"

Third party abuse #
The requirement that all those registered notify all changes in details risks creating the means of tracking and persecution through improper use of the database. A variety of persons have good reason to conceal their identity and whereabouts; for example: those fleeing domestic abuse; victims of "honour" crimes; witnesses in criminal cases; those at risk of kidnapping; undercover investigators; refugees from oppressive regimes overseas; those pursued by the press; those who may be terrorist targets. The seizure of ID cards (like benefit-books and passports now) will become a means for extortion by gangsters.


http://www.no2id.net/IDSchemes/whyNot.php



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

17 Nov 2006, 8:56 am

Give authorities any more power than they strictly need to carry out their duties and they will abuse it for their own ends.

This is also relevant to us in the UK, as our authoritarian slimeballs - sorry, Labour Government - are introducing them with a hugely intrusive national register. This must not be allowed to pass.

Stop ID cards and the database state!

Image



Xuincherguixe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 May 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: Victoria, BC

17 Nov 2006, 10:48 pm

These sort of events reduce the legitimacy of law.

If you just go around abusing people because they don't do everything you say just because your wearing some article of clothing, it changes the nature of things.


If the only reason these organizations like the police and the army and the like exist is to force control on people? You have no obligation to obey. Only to preserve yourself.

Having a gun does not make you right.


The problem with the "might makes right" way of thinking, is that you're only right as long as you hold more power. No matter how indignant you might be about it when you come across someone stronger.



But then, not all cops are like this. Just far, far too many.



Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

18 Nov 2006, 2:09 am

They keep pushing the limits of what is acceptable. Last year's atrocities are this year's justifiable use of force.



hyperbolic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,869

18 Nov 2006, 3:05 am

Quote:
God just show your fricken' IDs. How hard can it be. Plus China isn't a good country to be in anyway. I'll never go there. Why wouldn't someone want to show them their ID? I sure would just to get it over with.


The guy should have shown his ID, without a question. The police came because you're supposed to be quiet in a library and this guy was the definition of "Disturbing the Peace" as he was loud and irrational. Maybe he was on drugs. Or, if drugs are not his problem he should have been referred to a mental health professional or anger management group. His pleads about the Patriot Act were misplaced; I suppose because he was a middle easterner he thought he could get some kind of sympathy.

Alright, I'm asking some friends at UCLA about this video to find out more, perhaps shed more light on what happened, although it might just be hearsay I get.



ljbouchard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,278
Location: Rochester Minnesota

18 Nov 2006, 3:55 am

Uhhhh, it does not look like he was disturbing the peace until after he was shocked. Let me send 50,000 volts through you and see if you do not scream.


_________________
Louis J Bouchard
Rochester Minnesota

"Only when all those who surround you are different, do you truly belong."
---------------------------------------------------
Fred Tate Little Man Tate


Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

18 Nov 2006, 10:37 am

He didn't show his ID because he had forgotten it, didn't have it on him. He was leaving, there are witnesses to that fact. The police pre-empted compliance and then did a number on him.



Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

18 Nov 2006, 10:40 am

It has become far too acceptible for police to contrive that a person is a threat and treat him as such. Police are supposed to take risks to protect citizens, risks with their own life, and when they can't do this on the off chance that he will grab a gun or something, they don't want to do their jobs and shouldn't have them.

Mandatory, five years jail minimum for each of those officers. Aggravated battery, under color of law.



ion
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 476
Location: Sweden

18 Nov 2006, 1:06 pm

manalitwist wrote:
"...(Mostafa) Tabatabainejad did not show ID to community service officers who were conducting a random check..."


Yeah, of course ... a "random" check ... could have been anyone ...

Random my ass!
More like "Hey! Look! A BROWN kid! Let's f**k around with him!"

What's surprising to me is that the general population of the U.S. doesn't seem to know these things.
When I read your post, my first thought was "Of course! You didn't know this?!?".
Then I felt sad because I who live on the other side of the globe know more about this than the people concerned that can do something about it... :x

likedcalico wrote:
God just show your fricken' IDs. How hard can it be. Plus China isn't a good country to be in anyway. I'll never go there. Why wouldn't someone want to show them their ID? I sure would just to get it over with.


I'll never go to the U.S.A, but I'm going to China.
China is at least honest about being an oppressive regime without rights.
The U.S. somehow tries to insinuate that it isn't.

Can you tell me why toilets rooms have doors, for example?
Maybe you don't understand it, but some people want privacy, to the degree that it's in the U.S. constitution, apparently.
Like why you love your wife, that's a thing that you just don't question. You don't ask someone why they love their wife. They just do and that's that.
And when people have their right to privacy challenged, the good people stand up for the principle of it.
They don't have to show ID, so they don't, and if they get s**t for it, then it just proves that they are right and where things are going.
If you're entering a private, governmental or secure facility and is asked to show ID, you have the choices of doing so, or to leave peacefully. If you can't or won't show ID, the worst that can happen is that you're escorted away.
At least up until they all decided to go all fascist.



hyperbolic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,869

18 Nov 2006, 1:30 pm

Quote:
Yeah, of course ... a "random" check ... could have been anyone ...

Random my ass!
More like "Hey! Look! A BROWN kid! Let's f**k around with him!"


But then, maybe it was random. Also, one of the cops handling the dude was black and another cop in the video was Asian.

Quote:
I'll never go to the U.S.A, but I'm going to China.


Are you sure? You know they've banned Wikipedia.



manalitwist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 949

18 Nov 2006, 1:53 pm

xon wrote:
Quote:
Yeah, of course ... a "random" check ... could have been anyone ...

Random my ass!
More like "Hey! Look! A BROWN kid! Let's f**k around with him!"


But then, maybe it was random. Also, one of the cops handling the dude was black and another cop in the video was Asian.

Quote:
I'll never go to the U.S.A, but I'm going to China.


Are you sure? You know they've banned Wikipedia.


Have you not noticed that it is Muslims who are bearing the brunt of racism in todays society, much more so than the traditional victims :blacks, Jews and Asians..Regardless, it is not mandatory (yet..) to show ID and no one should suffer what this man did, yet it is becoming more the norm as we enter into the police state..



ion
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 476
Location: Sweden

18 Nov 2006, 2:15 pm

xon wrote:
Are you sure? You know they've banned Wikipedia.


Encrypted ssh tunnel via http proxy. :wink:
The Chinese censorship can be circumvented, and I hear many things are implemented in a city block by city block fashion, meaning that a website blocked in one part of town may be open in another.



tallfreak
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 118

18 Nov 2006, 4:27 pm

I'm not saying if what happened was justifiable or not. My Aspie father who is also a federal agent and I were talking about this. The incident should be investigated, but from just that video, we can't tell exactly how it all started.

A police officer is there to enforce the laws on the books: State, Federal, County, City (or campus.) Different states have different laws concerning ID. (and many times they conflict.) In New York state, state law does state that any NY resident 16 or older, must carry a New York State ID at all times. This law has been in effect for over 30 years. If indeed a similar law is on the books for the campus, LA or California, then the officers had the right to ask. They are there to protect and if indeed it was random or not.

Remember that whenever you are stopped, or questions by an officer, you are now a suspect. That doesn't mean you don't have any writes or even under arrested, but it does mean that you have to comply to the officers reasonable request (like showing an ID.) Now instead of the guy saying he didn't have his ID on him, he confronted the officer with a "I don't have to show you.." remark. If indeed it was unlawful, that is not the time or place to resist. Wait till later and fight it in court because that is the time and place to do it.

Now any police officer is trained to subdue a suspect at any sign of resistance in a physical nature. It could be as simple as pointing and putting your finger on an officer. (That's all it takes for an officer to get physical with you.) We don't know if this was the case or not here. I would bet it was since there were so many witnesses.

-Scott



Nexus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 833
Location: On I2

18 Nov 2006, 11:21 pm

xon wrote:
Are you sure? You know they've banned Wikipedia.

Not anymore


_________________
"Have a nice apocalypse" - Southland Tales


Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

19 Nov 2006, 12:37 am

Tallfreak, that kind of domination is exactly what a police state is made up of.



ADoyle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 913
Location: Southern California, USA

20 Nov 2006, 1:57 am

diseased wrote:
Are UCLA PD a branch of LAPD?


The UCLA police are a seperate force, but they are officers with the same authority as the LAPD or other city police. They have the authority to make arrests and to give out traffic tickets if they see a violation within the perimeter of the campus while patrolling the boundaries. They also provide security for games and other events on campus. If you were to call 9-1-1 from a campus phone, it automatically goes to the campus police station.

As for this issue, one reason that this victim was asked for his ID was that the library had a rule that only students could be in the building after 11pm. I do think he was asked to show his ID because he is Middle Eastern, which is an example racial profiling. If he were driving, it would be a form of DWB, except the "B" stands for Brown, not Black like it once did.

One problem is that the video only shows the tasering itself, not what led to that unfortunate incident. That's why there needs to be an impartial investigation, and the officers involved should be temporary suspended until it's over. What really makes this suspicious is that innocent bystanders were threatened with tasering themselves if they kept telling the officers to back off. It's scary that after 9/11, Muslims and other Middle Easterners are being unfairly targeted in racial profiling, when the vast majority of them are law-abiding members of society.


_________________
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason,
and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
- Galileo Galilei