sociable_hermit wrote:
ascan wrote:
As for Labour, I hear the latest is that we're going to be locked-up for driving through a red light.
Good.
I can't stand all these hypocritical bastards who are "tough on crime" except when it comes to their own motoring offences.
If you speed, hold a mobile phone whilst driving, or jump a red light (and that includes London f***ing cyclists - are you listening you self-centered dangerous bastards?) then you are more likely to kill or injure someone, and for that reason you SHOULD be jailed.
"Oooooooh, speed cameras MUST be painted bright yellow otherwise IT'S SO UNFAIR!"
Piss off, you shouldn't be speeding anyway.
The law is the law, it's not optional. Motoring is no exception.
I see you don't drive.
Speed limit signs are not infrequently missing or obscured. It's quite easy to drive past speed limit signs that are covered by vegetation on the near side, and by, say, a high-sided vehicle on the other. I know, because I've driven all over this miserable country and had it happen to me.
As for red lights, there are junctions where it is possible to see the lights that control traffic from a side road at right angles to where you car is positioned. Under certain circumstances it is possible to get confused by this.
Furthermore, drivers are human. They make mistakes. You cannot drive thirty thousand miles a year and not break a speed limit, or maybe mis-judge an amber light. It happens to everyone who drives.
And you'd send someone to prison for that? Saying "the law is the law" as you do is childish and simplistic to the extreme. I bet you don't even know a fraction of the legislation that governs your existence within the UK, yet you insist drivers be punished by such draconian measures!
Last edited by ascan on 14 Dec 2006, 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.