Allegedly, parents beat boy to death...

Page 2 of 3 [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm

I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

31 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm

auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.

it needs to be patiently yet forcefully imparted upon short-term-thinking people that "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later, with interest." IOW taxes NOW to support prophylactic measures to maintain the integrity of the social contract, or eventual societal breakdown and chaos later on which is much tougher and costlier to fix if it even is not too late to fix. I am pejoristic in this regard because americans historically have been so short-sighted.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

31 Aug 2014, 1:59 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.

it needs to be patiently yet forcefully imparted upon short-term-thinking people that "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later, with interest." IOW taxes NOW to support prophylactic measures to maintain the integrity of the social contract, or eventual societal breakdown and chaos later on which is much tougher and costlier to fix if it even is not too late to fix. I am pejoristic in this regard because americans historically have been so short-sighted.


Most people can't see beyond their pocketbooks.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2014, 2:04 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.

it needs to be patiently yet forcefully imparted upon short-term-thinking people that "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later, with interest." IOW taxes NOW to support prophylactic measures to maintain the integrity of the social contract, or eventual societal breakdown and chaos later on which is much tougher and costlier to fix if it even is not too late to fix. I am pejoristic in this regard because americans historically have been so short-sighted.


Most people can't see beyond their pocketbooks.

most people failed the marshmallow test.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

31 Aug 2014, 2:11 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.

it needs to be patiently yet forcefully imparted upon short-term-thinking people that "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later, with interest." IOW taxes NOW to support prophylactic measures to maintain the integrity of the social contract, or eventual societal breakdown and chaos later on which is much tougher and costlier to fix if it even is not too late to fix. I am pejoristic in this regard because americans historically have been so short-sighted.


Most people can't see beyond their pocketbooks.

most people failed the marshmallow test.


I concede I do not know what that is. :oops:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

31 Aug 2014, 2:31 pm

auntblabby wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_marshmallow_experiment


Thanks, I get it now.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 76,648
Location: Portland, Oregon

31 Aug 2014, 4:27 pm

Raptor wrote:
AnonymousAnonymous wrote:
Worse, the social workers mentioned in the article didn't see any form of abuse going on in that home. Either the parents were good at lying or that would make the social workers accessories to murder.

I wouldn't put too much faith in any social worker.


I agree. IMO, most social workers are too overworked to give a care about children.


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

31 Aug 2014, 5:38 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.

it needs to be patiently yet forcefully imparted upon short-term-thinking people that "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later, with interest." IOW taxes NOW to support prophylactic measures to maintain the integrity of the social contract, or eventual societal breakdown and chaos later on which is much tougher and costlier to fix if it even is not too late to fix. I am pejoristic in this regard because americans historically have been so short-sighted.


Most people can't see beyond their pocketbooks.

:roll:
It's invasive with plenty of room for state abuse is what it is. Very few parents are anywhere near as bad as those two douchebags in the article so why punish everyone?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

31 Aug 2014, 5:59 pm

Misslizard wrote:
Why would anyone even care if a child was playing with dolls??I played with cars when I was little.Thank goodness my folks didn't beat me for unladylike play.
A kid should be able to play with any toy,(as long as it's not dangerous)if they are happy who cares?

Most people feel that a boy playing with girls dolls is disturbing and that's just how it is. Action figures, of course, are fine. No amount of progressive whitewashing is going to change that in the near future where most people are concerned, either.
I think you know what Im talking about.....


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2014, 6:12 pm

"action figures" = dolls. but if calling a doll an action figure sounds better to one, then more power. I think female dolls should be called female action figures.



lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,937
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.

31 Aug 2014, 6:49 pm

My parents had absolutely no problem when I played with action figures as a kid, which technically are dolls, they just call them that because most people are still very set in what's considered gender-appropriate . But girls get away with doing boy things more because society thinks they're superior to girl stuff. :x



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2014, 6:52 pm

I have always preferred pink to blue.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,558
Location: Aux Arcs

31 Aug 2014, 7:11 pm

Raptor wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Why would anyone even care if a child was playing with dolls??I played with cars when I was little.Thank goodness my folks didn't beat me for unladylike play.
A kid should be able to play with any toy,(as long as it's not dangerous)if they are happy who cares?

Most people feel that a boy playing with girls dolls is disturbing and that's just how it is. Action figures, of course, are fine. No amount of progressive whitewashing is going to change that in the near future where most people are concerned, either.
I think you know what Im talking about.....

I don't see what's "disturbing"about it.Or boys playing dress up.My daughter wouldn't play with my son at times unless she got to dress him up like a girl to play"Little House on the Prarie".
When this happened I found it funny as all get out.One boy got a GI Joe that said"Let's go shopping."The boy kept it instead of trading it in for an unaltered one.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbie_L ... ganization


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

31 Aug 2014, 7:25 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I just had a thought :? - I know that is sometimes a dangerous thing - but, maybe if prospective parents all were required to go through a "dress rehearsal" or practice parenting session or sessions using animatronic dolls and computer simulations of various parenting scenarios, it might open more than a few eyes as to what parenthood fully entails and what prospective parents would be getting themselves into. just a thought. I have long thought that parenthood should be licensed along with marriage. if something as mundane as cars should need to be licensed, so too should something as critical as parenthood, for the good of society.


People would b***h that they had to pay taxes to support the program.

it needs to be patiently yet forcefully imparted upon short-term-thinking people that "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later, with interest." IOW taxes NOW to support prophylactic measures to maintain the integrity of the social contract, or eventual societal breakdown and chaos later on which is much tougher and costlier to fix if it even is not too late to fix. I am pejoristic in this regard because americans historically have been so short-sighted.


Most people can't see beyond their pocketbooks.

:roll:
It's invasive with plenty of room for state abuse is what it is. Very few parents are anywhere near as bad as those two douchebags in the article so why punish everyone?


C'mon, Blabby and I weren't seriously talking about taxing people to pay for robotic surrogate children before they can have the real thing! :roll:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer