ACLU: Police encounters kill hundreds of disabled Americans

Page 2 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

23 Mar 2015, 9:18 am

1) I don't think a two-year community college degree should be qualification enough to be a police officer.
2) Cops are not the right people to respond to 911 callers who are specifically seeking help dealing with mental illness. Right now the choices are cops, EMTs, or fire response. We need a fourth choice - mental health professionals.



Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

23 Mar 2015, 9:20 am

AspieUtah wrote:
Humanaut wrote:
Many of these cases are undoubtedly suicide by cop.

Even if that were true, the suggestion implies foreknowledge by the officers to "play along" with the suicide, thereby serving willingly as homicidal actors by proxy.

A despicable suggestion.



KimD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 585

23 Mar 2015, 9:50 am

YippySkippy wrote:
1) I don't think a two-year community college degree should be qualification enough to be a police officer.
2) Cops are not the right people to respond to 911 callers who are specifically seeking help dealing with mental illness. Right now the choices are cops, EMTs, or fire response. We need a fourth choice - mental health professionals.


I agree--great insight!

Of course, we'd all be much better off if mental health care were de-stigmatized so that fewer people might actually reach the point of crisis in the first place.



AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

23 Mar 2015, 11:36 am

Humanaut wrote:
AspieUtah wrote:
Humanaut wrote:
Many of these cases are undoubtedly suicide by cop.

Even if that were true, the suggestion implies foreknowledge by the officers to "play along" with the suicide, thereby serving willingly as homicidal actors by proxy.

A despicable suggestion.

How so? Law-enforcement agencies (LEAs) and their officers (LEOs) have at their disposal non-lethal and less-lethal tactics, don't they? The infamous cases of officers draining the batteries of their Tasers by pressing the triggers repeatedly, choke-holding or shooting their victims until death occurs, have seldom shown evidence that the officers attempted to used non-lethal and less-lethal tactics. Or, for that matter, any desire to stop the aggression when the victim passes out.

That the ACLU (and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network among many other disability groups) have decided to weigh in on this matter by publishing their survey of statistics within their amici curiae (friend of the court) brief ( https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/file ... _union.pdf ) suggests that there is something to the notion that officers are acting outside of law. The ACLU is a lot of things, but offensive to the very courts that make its existence and occasional accomplishments possible isn't one of them. After all, the survey was theirs, but the stats were from the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, LEAs themselves and various news media. They are all getting it wrong?

So, while I agree that there is statistical and anecdotal evidence of suicide by cop, I see the reason for any increase in its existence to be the increase in lethality of officer practices and weapons, not that disabled Americans are suddenly more suicidal (and not too creatively so if they all choose suicide by cop considering that drug overdoses among people with disabilities is easier and more likely with them possessing more drugs than people without disabilities). Even if the latter were true, where else in U.S. history has such a phenomenon occurred? And, when they do occur, where are the LEA offers of settlement in lieu of complaints and criminal charges? Where are apologies? Where are the internal-affairs and federal reviews, and consequent employment dismissals? No, LEAs describe routinely how their officers who kill performed according to law and policy. "Nothing to see here."

In light of all the evidence (see the ACLU brief supra), Occam's razor alone points to the likely culprit: the commonality of increased lethality of LEOs, their weapons and the choices made to pursue pain, punishment and injury beyond that which is necessary for the primary job officers have: arrest.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,224
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

23 Mar 2015, 11:55 am

Cops generally shoot until the threat is stopped and if they shoot someone once, it's still considered lethal force. So if you don't think they were justified in shooting someone multiple times l, they probably weren't justified in shooting that person in the first place.

I think we need to require all police officers to undergo mandatory comprehensive disability training on a continual basis so cops don't misidentify a disabled person as a threat.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

23 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm

alex wrote:
Cops generally shoot until the threat is stopped and if they shoot someone once, it's still considered lethal force. So if you don't think they were justified in shooting someone multiple times l, they probably weren't justified in shooting that person in the first place.

I think we need to require all police officers to undergo mandatory comprehensive disability training on a continual basis so cops don't misidentify a disabled person as a threat.

Indeed. Their definition of "threat" has shifted regardless of their use of firearms, choke-holding or Tasering. "Stopping the threat" is taught to every firearm owner. However, it is also taught that continuing to fire on a target after the target had been stopped (retreating, hiding, collapsing, falling etc.) has been considered excessive and, in many cases, illegal by many states and punished accordingly.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


will@rd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 709

23 Mar 2015, 12:52 pm

Don't be a gullible dupe of selective media reporting. They show you what they want you to see, to mold your attitudes, opinions and fears. In a country of 350 Million, all sorts of things are happening, round the clock, every day - showing you isolated incidents, cherry-picked to create a single impression, does not constitute a trend of any kind. Its brainwashing.

The US Mainstream Media right now is nothing but a Propaganda Machine. If you will actually research the stories they're selling you and see how askew the media "truth" is from the actual facts, you'll never believe anything they tell you again.


_________________
"I don't mean to sound bitter, cynical or cruel - but I am, so that's how it comes out." - Bill Hicks


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

23 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm

alex wrote:
I think we need to require all police officers to undergo mandatory comprehensive disability training on a continual basis so cops don't misidentify a disabled person as a threat.


I agree with this.

You can see how quickly the wrong training kicks in in this (warning: distrubing) video of police shooting a schizophrenic man:
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/vide ... n-harrison



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,258
Location: the island of defective toy santas

23 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm

and now from the files of "you just can't make this stuff up" comes this-

On Sept. 14, 2013, Times Square visitors witnessed a major flaw in how the New York Police Department deals with the mentally ill at Times Square.
Glenn Broadnax, 35, was walking in and out of traffic when he was confronted by police officers. They eventually opened fire on him and missed him, but hit two women bystanders, who survived. Video of the shooting went viral and critiques over how poorly the officers at the scene dealt with the situation followed.
"Cops don't know enough about the mentally ill," Eugene O'Donnell, a former NYPD cop and professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, in Manhattan, told CBS News' Crimesider at the time.
Broadnax, who was unarmed, was charged with wounding the bystanders who were shot by police. It was a perverse form of justice, but you could count Broadnax lucky in one way. He narrowly escaped being one of the 56 mentally ill New Yorkers who were fatally shot by the NYPD that year.

they charged a mentally ill person for making the cops negligently shoot two innocent bystanders???! !! what about at least disarming the flatfoots who did that in the first place?



AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

23 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm

auntblabby wrote:
and now from the files of "you just can't make this stuff up" comes this-

On Sept. 14, 2013, Times Square visitors witnessed a major flaw in how the New York Police Department deals with the mentally ill at Times Square.
Glenn Broadnax, 35, was walking in and out of traffic when he was confronted by police officers. They eventually opened fire on him and missed him, but hit two women bystanders, who survived. Video of the shooting went viral and critiques over how poorly the officers at the scene dealt with the situation followed.
"Cops don't know enough about the mentally ill," Eugene O'Donnell, a former NYPD cop and professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, in Manhattan, told CBS News' Crimesider at the time.
Broadnax, who was unarmed, was charged with wounding the bystanders who were shot by police. It was a perverse form of justice, but you could count Broadnax lucky in one way. He narrowly escaped being one of the 56 mentally ill New Yorkers who were fatally shot by the NYPD that year.

Even Monty Python would call that silly. :lol:
they charged a mentally ill person for making the cops negligently shoot two innocent bystanders???! ! ! what about at least disarming the flatfoots who did that in the first place?


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Canadian1911
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 228
Location: Getting ready to attack Fort Niagara!

23 Mar 2015, 5:26 pm

Luckily, I behave better than a lot of people in public - I don't break any laws and act respectful. I have no fear of being killed because of a misunderstanding of beavhiour. But I have heard that cops killed a boy with Down Syndrome once at the movies because of an issue over a movie ticket.

Like f' I have an american police officer friend, who says if anyone tries to harm me - she will soot them.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,258
Location: the island of defective toy santas

23 Mar 2015, 5:27 pm

I believe our dear nation has done gone plumb loco. when thugs are hired as cops, it IS the end.



Canadian1911
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 228
Location: Getting ready to attack Fort Niagara!

23 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm

Adamantium wrote:
alex wrote:
I think we need to require all police officers to undergo mandatory comprehensive disability training on a continual basis so cops don't misidentify a disabled person as a threat.


I agree with this.

You can see how quickly the wrong training kicks in in this (warning: distrubing) video of police shooting a schizophrenic man:
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/vide ... n-harrison


Also, agreed.



Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

23 Mar 2015, 6:00 pm

will@rd wrote:
In a country of 350 Million, all sorts of things are happening, round the clock, every day - showing you isolated incidents, cherry-picked to create a single impression, does not constitute a trend of any kind.

Demonizing law enforcement officers seems to be a trend. The tendency to interpret as acts of evil any deviation from what is perceived as ideal conditions, is another (trend). I'm not sure if nurturing the notion that the mentally disabled should be granted some sort of immunity is the right way to approach what in many cases are acts of suicide. Acts that victimize those who are forced to react according to procedure. Blaming the police officers is a double injustice.



SpiceWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 802

24 Mar 2015, 10:36 am

Fnord wrote:
If people feel so badly for the poor, disabled people in this country, then what are so many of them homeless and wandering the streets?

If the cop-haters would turn their attention to actually helping and protecting homeless and disabled people, ...


You mean like this man perhaps?
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/04/justi ... s-charges/



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,224
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

24 Mar 2015, 10:42 am

Humanaut wrote:
will@rd wrote:
In a country of 350 Million, all sorts of things are happening, round the clock, every day - showing you isolated incidents, cherry-picked to create a single impression, does not constitute a trend of any kind.

Demonizing law enforcement officers seems to be a trend. The tendency to interpret as acts of evil any deviation from what is perceived as ideal conditions, is another (trend). I'm not sure if nurturing the notion that the mentally disabled should be granted some sort of immunity is the right way to approach what in many cases are acts of suicide. Acts that victimize those who are forced to react according to procedure. Blaming the police officers is a double injustice.


The blame should be placed on the lack of training, not the officers themselves. Unless an officer is legitimately at fault in a specific instance.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social