Anyone else watch the Democratic Town Hall?
Jacoby,
The video clip contained nothing but speculation, and at the end the woman from ABC expressed doubt that an indictment would be handed down. The other thing is Joe Scarborough is a former Republican representative who is not very sympathetic to Hillary in the first place. So, yeah there's nothing there. Got any other sources?
Biden already said he wasn't running, and Bloomberg doesn't have enough support. Neither of them will have much of an impact in this election.
The video clip contained nothing but speculation, and at the end the woman from ABC expressed doubt that an indictment would be handed down. The other thing is Joe Scarborough is a former Republican representative who is not very sympathetic to Hillary in the first place. So, yeah there's nothing there. Got any other sources?
Biden already said he wasn't running, and Bloomberg doesn't have enough support. Neither of them will have much of an impact in this election.
Go look for them yourself or just be shocked when it happens, I don't care since there has been months and months of reporting from hundreds of sources on this with leaks from the FBI and all that good stuff so don't say you weren't warned. People like you sticking your head in the sand is exactly what I want since I would like Hillary to be the nominee because she will lose, be it to Trump or Cruz or any other Republican. Bloomberg has a better chance at winning the presidency than Hillary, Bloomberg even saying this now is evidence that the powers that be are starting to get antsy because Wall Street which owns Hillary and Bloomberg is one of those powers. Sanders obviously would never be allowed to be president by the big money players in this country, people speculated before about Bloomberg running only if Sanders somehow got the nomination but now since Hillary is so weakened now it is an indictment on the entire field from the big money establishment. Bloomberg right now starts at like 13% with the GOP/Dem running neck and neck in the mid to high 30% and that is without even actually being in the race so I think if a guy with 40+ billion dollars to burn decides to enter the race they will have a very very big impact. I
I think Hillary might drop out, it looks like she will lose Iowa and New Hampshire and with the FBI investigation progressing plus she isn't in that great of health anyways. The writing will be on the wall, there will be massive pressure on her to get out of the way so the establishment can "save" their party and the establishment has more than enough leverage over the Clinton's to force them out of the way but the question is who can they replace her with on such short notice? I don't believe Joe Biden, John Kerry, Al Gore, Jerry Brown, whatever dinosaur they can dig up will be able to do it and they'd be stupid to throw their bench straight the wolves with someone like Warren or Booker.
The video clip contained nothing but speculation, and at the end the woman from ABC expressed doubt that an indictment would be handed down. The other thing is Joe Scarborough is a former Republican representative who is not very sympathetic to Hillary in the first place. So, yeah there's nothing there. Got any other sources?
Biden already said he wasn't running, and Bloomberg doesn't have enough support. Neither of them will have much of an impact in this election.
Go look for them yourself or just be shocked when it happens, I don't care since there has been months and months of reporting from hundreds of sources on this with leaks from the FBI and all that good stuff so don't say you weren't warned. People like you sticking your head in the sand is exactly what I want since I would like Hillary to be the nominee because she will lose, be it to Trump or Cruz or any other Republican. Bloomberg has a better chance at winning the presidency than Hillary, Bloomberg even saying this now is evidence that the powers that be are starting to get antsy because Wall Street which owns Hillary and Bloomberg is one of those powers. Sanders obviously would never be allowed to be president by the big money players in this country, people speculated before about Bloomberg running only if Sanders somehow got the nomination but now since Hillary is so weakened now it is an indictment on the entire field from the big money establishment. Bloomberg right now starts at like 13% with the GOP/Dem running neck and neck in the mid to high 30% and that is without even actually being in the race so I think if a guy with 40+ billion dollars to burn decides to enter the race they will have a very very big impact. I
I think Hillary might drop out, it looks like she will lose Iowa and New Hampshire and with the FBI investigation progressing plus she isn't in that great of health anyways. The writing will be on the wall, there will be massive pressure on her to get out of the way so the establishment can "save" their party and the establishment has more than enough leverage over the Clinton's to force them out of the way but the question is who can they replace her with on such short notice? I don't believe Joe Biden, John Kerry, Al Gore, Jerry Brown, whatever dinosaur they can dig up will be able to do it and they'd be stupid to throw their bench straight the wolves with someone like Warren or Booker.
If there has been months of reports you shouldn't have any problems pointing me to one. And I have looked, There is nothing there. If it does happen, however unlikely, I'll admit I was wrong. I have no problem with that.
I'll leave it at that because we seem to be at an impasse. Anyway I will say that I completely disagree with your analysis. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
So when Collin Powell and Condoleezza Rice do it, it's legal and AOK. But, when Hillary Clinton does the same, she's a felonious serial criminal. Which is it now???
So when Collin Powell and Condoleezza Rice do it, it's legal and AOK. But, when Hillary Clinton does the same, she's a felonious serial criminal. Which is it now???
Collin Powell and Condi Rice didn't send or store classified information on their email, they had a specified classified closed email system at the State Department that they used for those matters whereas the problem isn't that Hillary simply had a private email address but how she used it and how she stored it. Look at what they did to David Petraeus, how is what he did worse than Hillary? If I have my information correct, they got him for showing his mistress(who had Top Secret clearance btw) notes from a notebook locked in his desk in his house. Hillary went thru tremendous lengths to essentially hide what she was doing on her email from ever seeing the light of day, you don't think it was for convenience do you? The whole purpose was the shield it from future FOIA requests, she was trying to cover her tracks. What Richard Nixon did pales in comparison to the crimes perpetrated by the Clintons. Considering how stringent the Obama administration has been in using the Espionage Act, it would be a total joke to let Hillary off free. You do go thru those lengths when you're not up to something, the Clintons are wholly owned by the new world order because their lives could be destroyed in a blink of an eye if they ever were ever held accounted from many crimes they've committed. Trust me, these emails is like getting Al Capone for tax evasion.
So if Bernie somehow wins, his policies would obviously be very helpful for autistic people. Universal health care and $15/hour minimum wage would help people at the start of their careers and people who are struggling. Free community college would be really helpful for younger autistic people. The people who go to college while they are maturing their social skills seem to do MUCH better, holistically. Having more infrastructure jobs would give people more career options. From experience, I can tell you that it's not so bad to have a factory type job where people leave you alone and you have a repetitive task to do all day.
I thought Bernie did really well, O'Malley did well, and Hillary was shockingly,h out of control bad with her answers. It seemed like she was yelling at everyone who asked her a question, even if she was agreeing with them. And she kept mentioning Obama and Bill Clinton. It looked to me like she knew she was losing.
This morning all the news stations are raving about how well she did. I'm just wondering, am I nuts? Did she really do well and I'm not seeing it?
Universal healthcare, $15 minimum wage, free community college, all sound like campaign promises to me. We're electing a president this year, not a monarch so none of those promises will be fulfilled. There will not be enough support for them.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
I have an (unused) BS in information systems. What she did was essentially the same as leaving a stack of top secret and above top secret information on the hood of her car. Anyone walking by could have picked it up and read it. I could have picked it up and read it, and I'm not good at that kind of thing. The only thing that keeps any one of us from being hacked at any given time is lack of interest. You can be sure that people were interested in CLINTONSERVER or whatever it was it was named. It was something dumb like that. She undoubtedly got people killed having that information on a private server that doesn't have the security of being on a network with proper network security people looking after it. Stuff like that should really be on a closed system with no access to the Internet.
If Bernie doesn't get the nomination I will either vote for the republican candidate or not vote at all. And that's a terrible thing to say. I agree that they're very likely to do something to Bernie to not let him get the nomination. But if they do that, they need to throw in a better candidate than loose lips Clinton.
