Britain has not become racist overnight

Post Reply New Topic

This is how I think of the alt-right. If we are to be Puritanical, logical extremists, they are alt, because they are either some kind of minority member or engage in some moral vice.

I think the can of worms was opened, when migrants, subcultures, and reprobates, who could never be criticized, made racist or quasi-conservative comments.

So…, uhm, there’s always been racism, so time-honored racism should be honored by means of continued racism?

Social media was awash this weekend with angry brexiters ranting away after our new PM confirmed that we would not be getting a points based immigration system for EU nationals.

Nigel Farage now says he might make a come back as that is what people thought they were voting for

Wherever nationalism subsides, leftist poster children then make racist comments. For instance, British Muslims against British Jews.

It's considered edgy and hip, when conspicuous gays and drug abusers praise social utilitarianism. For instance, white supremists saying something is dank and based (drug slang), using gangster rap and pop music as a platform. Milo likes blacks (explicitly) but not women. Hindu "conservatives" in a Christian culture.

Black Trump supporters, advocating Blue Lives Matter, because you are never allowed to disagree with anything they say, on account of their minority status.

Racism made a resurgance, from what was once a protected class, never to be named in the light of day, much less criticized.

It's true that Britain - or to be more specific, England - hasn't become racist overnight. For hundreds of years there has been a virulent current of racism, xenophobia and self-satisfied nationalism that runs just below the surface of English society, and which periodically shows its ugly face, as the recent vote to leave the EU amply demonstrates. It was present in the apparatus and attitudes of the British Empire (run predominantly by the English), in Oswald Moseley's Blackshirt movement, and also in the skinheads and the English football supporters who adorn themselves with George crosses and brawl drunkenly in the streets of foreign countries. More insidiously, it exists in the smug attitudes of the English bourgeoisie who are ignorant of other cultures, believe that England (not Britain) won World War II singlehandedly (in their eyes the USA and the Soviet Union played no part) and insist on shouting at the locals in English when they travel abroad because they don't speak any foreign languages.

Fortunately the majority of English people don't behave like this, but there is undoubtedly a significant and vociferous minority - many of them public figures - who do. At the 2015 election, 3.9 million people voted for UKIP, whose agenda is unashamedly racist. Many others, particularly Conservative supporters, tacitly agree with them. It is this minority who feel empowered by the Brexit vote to vent their spleen on anyone who seems in some way foreign or simply 'Other'. And, apart from a few isolated incidents, the violence and hatred shown towards foreigners since 23 June has been in England, not elsewhere in the UK.

But seen more broadly, nationalist racism is in the ascendant in much of the western world. Golden Dawn in Greece, Jobbik in Hungary, the Front National in France, Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, the FPÖ in Austria are all ultra-right-wing parties of a kind not seen in Europe since the 1930s, while in America there is Trump.

So the threat is very real.

I think of civil war in much the same respect as wrestling pigs and Bastiat's broken window.

You tell one set of people they are entitled, and then fall short.

You tell the other set of people they are no longer entitled.

In the long run, it's waste of wealth and morale. I believe Albert Pike had something to say about this.

One concern that seems to be on the minds of many remain and leave voters is what happens to the small minority that thought the vote was for something that it wasn't and therefore no matter what happens in the negotiations they don't get what they thought they were getting.

It has been shown since the vote that there was certainly a small number of people that thought the whole vote was about X, when it was in fact about the variables of Y, so no matter where they get with Y it will never be X. People were shows in the days after the vote to be protesting, holding up banners telling foreigners to 'go home' etc. These people will be very angry when they don't get what they thought they were in line to get. things will get very ugly.

To extend that out, what happens if we end up joining something like the EEA? We will have left the EU so will have done what was voted for, but will still have free movement of people, payments into the EU and living under EU law? There will again be a minority who get very angry about that feeling that this is not what they voted for, when it fact they voted for no specific policies at all and the EEA was always touted as being the most likely situation we end up in. There would be carnage on the streets from the angry brexiters.

^

You sum up the situation extremely well. This is a real danger. During the referendum campaign, both the Remain and the Leave sides were guilty of exaggerating the likely consequences, and in some cases telling outright lies. This was particularly true of the Leave side, who pandered to the sort of visceral racism I mentioned in my earlier post. At no point did they offer a clear vision of what the process of leaving the EU would entail, nor anything approaching a detailed plan of how it would be negotiated and what the UK's eventual position would be outside the EU. This has been proved by the fact that the Brexiters in government clearly have no idea of how to approach what is a gargantuan task. That's why Theresa May is taking charge of negotiations - Fox, Davies and Johnson are clueless, and are regarded with deep suspicion by the very EU officials who they have to now deal with.

So you're right: there are a lot of people in England particularly who thought the UK would simply leave the EU outright on 24 June, and that anyone who wasn't a British (or in their opinion 'English') citizen would be promptly deported. UKIP, Gove and Johnson led them to believe that this is what would happen if they voted to leave. But as you say, it's quite likely - and economically logical - that we will negotiate something similar to EEA membership, at which point Farage will put on his union jack shoes and start whipping up more hatred.

Among all the shouting, one vital fact has been forgotten. While the vote was clear, it was also very close to being 50-50. 48% of the electorate, notably young people whose future is at stake as well as 62% in Scotland, voted to remain, and the wishes of that 48% must be reflected in what the government now negotiates, because it concerns the future of everyone in the UK. This would have also been true if the vote had gone the other way, in which case the Leave camp would now be demanding to be heard.

So as you say, I can see things getting ugly. There's a nasty atmosphere pretty much everywhere you go.

Demanding to be “heard” when you’re a minority is an attempt to tyrannize the majority, no matter how small the margin is.

Besides, it won’t matter much if the whole EU falls apart when every country wants the same privileged status the UK will bully the rest into granting it, allowing more or less free trade, but not letting people cross borders, since most people don’t want other people to have the latter freedom. After all, the traditional way to move throughout the world is to wage war on the natives of whatever place you’re interested in and either conquer them to exploit them and their resources or die trying. You don’t move through your borders—you move your borders with you, or perish if they move against you. Natural selection and all that