Jailers stand by while paralyzed man slowly dies

Page 2 of 5 [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Jul 2016, 8:24 pm

It's obvious, those people in Tulsa law enforcement see people in their charge as less than human. I know I'm going to draw fire for this, but instances like this is the reason why people hate cops.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,264
Location: the island of defective toy santas

26 Jul 2016, 8:33 pm

it's like they WANT us to fear them.



Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

26 Jul 2016, 9:08 pm

Bullies like being feared; that’s more or less why they bully.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

26 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
It's obvious, those people in Tulsa law enforcement see people in their charge as less than human. I know I'm going to draw fire for this, but instances like this is the reason why people hate cops.


Dude, I don't think so. To be honest, there are a lot of people on the opposite side of the political spectrum that would agree with you-- they see America as a "police state" and I don't necessarily disagree with them on that front.



0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

27 Jul 2016, 3:59 am

auntblabby wrote:
it's like they WANT us to fear them.


The world's biggest gang.

They join the Blue Gang, for the same reason people join any gang. Because they are gutless little bully thug cowards, and they need their gang to feel safe.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

27 Jul 2016, 4:09 am

Spiderpig wrote:
Bullies like being feared; that’s more or less why they bully.


Which is the reason those guys in Dallas and Baton Rouge were right in what they did. The only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they will understand. You can't reason with violent sick people like this. The all just stick together and lie for each other.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

27 Jul 2016, 8:09 am

0regonGuy wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Bullies like being feared; that’s more or less why they bully.


Which is the reason those guys in Dallas and Baton Rouge were right in what they did. The only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they will understand. You can't reason with violent sick people like this. The all just stick together and lie for each other.


No, just no. Shooting from a crowd is not "standing up", it's a coward's attack. That type of violence only forces the police to hunker down in their current mentality. It is not helpful. The only way to change it is to change the institutions (police departments) themselves-- and that takes political mobilization.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

27 Jul 2016, 10:33 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
It's obvious, those people in Tulsa law enforcement see people in their charge as less than human. I know I'm going to draw fire for this, but instances like this is the reason why people hate cops.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

27 Jul 2016, 10:39 am

Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Bullies like being feared; that’s more or less why they bully.


Which is the reason those guys in Dallas and Baton Rouge were right in what they did. The only way to deal with bullies is to fight back. Thats the only thing they will understand. You can't reason with violent sick people like this. The all just stick together and lie for each other.


No, just no. Shooting from a crowd is not "standing up", it's a coward's attack. That type of violence only forces the police to hunker down in their current mentality. It is not helpful. The only way to change it is to change the institutions (police departments) themselves-- and that takes political mobilization.


Yeah, yeah, yeah. f*****g pigs paralyzing a man and leaving a man to die on a jail floor are "heros". f*****g pigs shooting the care giver for an autistic man, then handcuffing him an leaving him to bleed on the ground for 20 minutes are "heros". But people who fight back against the bully thugs are cowards? That's BS and you know it.

We hear it time and again. The cop says I had to shoot the 12 year old boy playing with the toy gun, "because I was in fear for my life". Fearing for your life = gutless cowards. That is the definition of a coward. Fighting back against bully thugs ≠ being a coward.

Quote:
coward
[kou-erd]
noun
1. a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person.
adjective
2. lacking courage; very fearful or timid.
3. proceeding from or expressive of fear or timidity:
a coward cry.


Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

27 Jul 2016, 11:10 am

0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

27 Jul 2016, 1:13 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


QFT.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

27 Jul 2016, 11:53 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

28 Jul 2016, 12:06 am

0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


You seem to think I disagree with you on police behavior-- I do not. The only difference between us is that I'm advocating for an approach that can actually make positive change right now where we're at in 2016 and beyond, whereas you're advocating taking it all the way back to the jungle and rebuilding from there, circa 8,000b.c. Sorry, but the last 10k years of human evolution have been too important to toss away because you're not patient enough to make change happen the civilized way.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

28 Jul 2016, 2:16 am

0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


I can sympathize with your anger, so forgive me when I say, retaliation for violence, an eye-for-an-eye, does nothing but create more dead and maimed humans.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


0regonGuy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2015
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon Coast

28 Jul 2016, 4:49 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


I can sympathize with your anger, so forgive me when I say, retaliation for violence, an eye-for-an-eye, does nothing but create more dead and maimed humans.


And how are you going to stop it, if you don't fight back? The pigs want the ultimate power of life and death over every single person they come in contact with. They want that power, they crave it. They are not going to give that power up, just because you ask them to.

We are living in a police state. The only way to get our rights and freedom back is to fight for it.


_________________
Autism Social Forum
A place for autistic people to discuss their interests.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

28 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm

0regonGuy wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
Stop twisting the meanings of words around. Every time a cop says "I was fearing for my life" he is by definition a coward. The the bully thug cops are the cowards. People who fight back against the bully thugs do not fit the definition of a coward.


When you're taking pot shots behind a group of civilians (really citizens, but since we're talking assassination we'll use the word civilian) you're not only being cowardly, you're also endangering those people-- who by all accounts were there peacefully. Not only that it destroys THEIR message, since now the story isn't about a protest against brutal police action, but the assassination of police officers-- which virtually no one is calling for but yourself and a few other fringies, not to mention that it plays right into the police union's narrative. Not only that, but it makes it hard for people like myself and the other posters here to make the argument for tighter control on police behavior, since well, they are actually being targeted and assassinated now-- and I can't from any kind of moral or humanitarian aspect defend that behavior. It doesn't help from a political perspective, rhetorical perspective, nor a progress perspective since how do you think the police will respond? *hint, hint-- they'll double down on their aggressive tactics. If you're going to turn into that which you hate, what is the point?


First off neither of those attacks endangered citizens, any more then the cops do with their shootings. If you want to talk about endangering citizens, lets talk about those cops in Washington state who sprayed a gas station and convenience store full of bullets, sending customers and employees diving on to the floor, while they were executing a man outside for throwing pebbles at them. But I guess you think it's OK for the cops to endanger a store full of people, because they don't want to get hit with a pebble.

As for how the cops will respond. I know how they will respond. They will retaliate. Thats what gangs do. They retaliate. The only thing that will stop them for retaliating, is fear that the other side will retaliate back against them again. When you retaliate against the bullies, then you can negotiate. If you don't fight back, then the bullies just keep on doing it. Which is what has been happening for years now. The number of cops getting killed has been going down, while the number of people getting killed by the cops has been skyrocketing.


I can sympathize with your anger, so forgive me when I say, retaliation for violence, an eye-for-an-eye, does nothing but create more dead and maimed humans.


And how are you going to stop it, if you don't fight back? The pigs want the ultimate power of life and death over every single person they come in contact with. They want that power, they crave it. They are not going to give that power up, just because you ask them to.

We are living in a police state. The only way to get our rights and freedom back is to fight for it.


You had used the analogy of one gang retaliating against another to describe the situation of dealing with abusive policemen. Well, one gang shooting up another in a driveby does nothing to stop violence, but only only spurs the other gang to seek revenge.
As to your question of how to stop bad police behavior - you prosecute bad cops for their crimes, and prosecute police departments and city governments that try to obstruct justice by covering up said crimes, or by suppressing evidence. And while it's been difficult to currently get such convictions, it can be done with the implementation of new laws, and the removal of old ones, such as the attempt here in Washington state to do away with the notion of provable, intentional malice on the part of the police in order to get a conviction. After all, the rest of us couldn't hope to walk away free on a murder charge just because the prosecution couldn't prove malice in the act of murder, which is the special treatment cops get from the court system.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer