Adamantium wrote:
In this, as in so many things, Jacoby, we'll have to agree to disagree.
I don't see the US practicing brinskmanship in Europe.
I don't see the US as continuously belligerent and imperialist toward Russia.
Regardless of whether we think about it or not, the possibility of nuclear annihilation is always hanging over our heads and has been continuously since the cold war. Nothing the US has done has returned us to a Cold War and Putin's showy BS, flying bombers all over the place with their transponders off, moving tens of thousands of men on exercises clearly designed to simulate invasion of their neighbors, etc. has not actually thrown us back into the Cold War either. Putin is doing a lot for his domestic audience, and a lot because he has the instincts of a tyrant--the US did not make him that way.
There is no rational analogy between the Cuban missile crisis and events in the Ukraine today. Russia is a country, not a person and thus has no particular feeling about it. Individual Russians have a range of reactions to that situation, only some of which are approving of Putin's response.
I think it is a perfect comparison, we're are moving NATO further and further east placing nuclear weapons on Russia's doorstep so naturally they will be upset. NATO does plenty of flexing themselves as well, there are two sides to this story.
Hypothetically would you start WWIII if Russia invaded Estonia which isn't going to happen but lets say it did, are you ready to end it all? I'm not, simply it's not our problem and we should look for ways to work Russia so we don't have to have this sword constantly hanging above us. We have a common enemy in Islamic extremism and Putin is no worse than a lot of our so called allies.
Here's my question... Would you start WWII if Germany invaded Austria? ...or wait for Poland?
Sweetheart, we cannot have a unilateral peace.
To the OP, I'm with Trump on this one. Screw those little pink bastards!