Clinton's anti-Bernie Tantrum

Post Reply New Topic

Hillary has a right to give her side of the story ... and I have a right to call her out as a corporate shill.

By the way, Democratic elites are trying to stomp out Bern again.



DOWN
WITH
THE
CLINTONS

Trouble is, Clinton cheated Sanders. Not that Sanders is any good, he's voted the same as Clinton 93% of the time. He'd just have been another Obama.

Nope.

Clinton has, historically, been a grade A war hawk. Bernie the sand man has always been a peace activist. He opposed the Gulf War back when hardly anyone else opposed it. He was giving an anti-war speech in congress one time. Hardly anyone showed up, but he kept talking because he is a man with an iron moral foundation. Hillary Clinton is a woman who will always change her beliefs in order to make more money. That's the real reason why most Americans hate her. Sexism is only a miniscule part of it.

Yeah, there were one or two Bernie supporters who insulted Clinton using a no-no word the starts with W and means "lady of the night". So what? Just as many Clinton supporters called Sanders a "Jewish Bolshevik".

Clinton supporters are scum. Did you know that they invented the "birther" controversy? It's true! The Obama birth certificate fiasco was actually started by People United Means Action.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/People_United_Means_Action



Nope.

Obama was a good liberal Marxist when he was younger. He became a corporate "liberal" because he was corrupted by Wall Street. Sanders remained loyal to the poor and needy because he was crowdfunded by the poor and needy. Politicians are naturally loyal to whoever pays them. That's how politics works.

Crowdfunding is a relatively new thing ... and the elites are terrified of it because it shall be the tool of their undoing.

Bernie Sanders supported every war from Kosovo to Yemen. He voted against the Iraq war because the Democrats did, they wanted a different kind of war. He voted for the banker bailouts, drone strikes which killed innocent civilians, sanctions on Iraq even after it'd killed hundreds of thousands of children. He's a fraud. Ron Paul has been the only anti-war candidate, hence why he got nowhere.

More Info: Clinton is now blaming Obama too.



In other words, this poser has her head 50 miles up her own ass. She felt entitled to the honor of being America's first female president, even though most women deserve that honor more than she does. Now she is blaming everyone except herself.

Let me play a sad song on the world's smallest violin.

Clinton's political career is officially over. She is currently less popular than Donald Trump. This means that most American women don't even like her. It's not very hard to see why. Clinton is a pompous douchebag who acts as though she speaks for all women. She's a hollow shell who has been trained to say "... because I'm a woman!" on cue. She clearly wants to look like a paragon of female empowerment, but she instead comes across as a Mary Sue due to her lack of character. Like a typical Mary Sue, she blames everyone but herself for her own screw-ups and she seems to believe that the entire universe revolves around her.

This woman is over. I will enjoy seeing her whine and cry as she slips into irrelevance and she feels her fragile ego throb like a toothache from Hell.

Universal healthcare, not free...

Which would still be far better than a trump.

Uh, no. Syria alone means Trump was the better option. Clinton wanted to get rid of Assad and Sanders would have too, which would mean it'd be another Jihadi express zone now and that would lead to probably a million people killed like what's happened in Iraq. But I guess 'equality' is more important than those people dying eh!

Clinton is toast. Bernie is toast. Their political career is over. When are people going to come to terms with that.

The political movement behind Bernie is not just some cult of personality. It is about bigger issues. He is replaceable.

Watch out for Chelsea Clinton

You're right

Any leader is replaceable, history has proven that time and time again. That's because leaders don't have near the power those below them think they have: they're restricted in what they can do based on what their supporters will allow, not just the opposition, hence the reason a philosophical movement is much more powerful than an individual leader and personality cults tend to be short-lived whereas actual philosophical movements have staying power.

You got it dude!

Clinton is not just toast. What she stands for as a politician is toast. She stands for corporate filth. That's why her and her followers spend so little time talking about what they believe.

I sometimes listen to Clinton supporters speak. It makes my ears and brain bleed.

"I'm voting for Hillary Clinton because I'm a strong, independent womyn and so is Clinton. America needs a female president because womyn are better listeners and men are lazy and womyn give birth and no female leader would ever lead her country into war and blah blah blah blah menstruation blah blah blah ovaries blah bah."

Clinton is done because all men and most women don't want to listen to that crap.

Bernie supporters will almost always talk about the things that Bernie believes. Bernie supporters will also talk about Bernie's source of funding. This is extremely important because corporate America already ruined Obama and possibly Trump. Only crowdfunded politicians are trustworthy at this point.

You never hear Bernie supporters talking about how amazing Jews are. I didn't even know that Bernie was Jewish until his Nazi opponents told me so.

Seriously? By all appearances and vocal mannerisms the man just stepped out of an episode of Seinfeld and you had no idea he was Jewish? I think you need your perception checked.

Yeah, isn't playing the "woman" argument over staying itself? Especially as there are tons of laws for women that men don't have any laws specifically to them at all? Oh yeah, there are the double standards and even outright, direct "man-shaming" that came into play over the past 50+/- years. I try to take this viewpoint with a grain of salt, but there are entire forums and sites dedicated to men complaining about the way they feel treated in the modern time (modern dating is a popular one, and I have personal anecdotal feelings that may validate that they have a point). This is something that the government probably can't/shouldn't try to account for, because it's a social factor. But, hey. The mass media, government, and maybe also popular entertainment work with each other to socially manipulate people. What do you think will happen if we all wanted to rise up and revolutionize our culture like we many times did in the past, how will the elite respond?

Laws to promote equality might only work if either groups had equivalent protections. Men's laws have to catch up. I know it's not exactly like pure individualism, but it's probably one of the only practical ways we can restore the balance of footing in society. So if you are going to create real laws affirming equality, don't make it about "minorities vs. majorities". Today, with the elite/government's focus exclusively on "minority" groups, they have almost forgotten that non-minorities exist.