Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

04 Dec 2017, 12:36 am

Empathy wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Certainly a can of worms for the conservative British establishment
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... album.html


You're clearly self-medicating from your own can of worms and you've just snuck in some parasites with you.
Australia may be useless at cracking a joke, but we have our own Mick Dundee here on Royal Soil.
So, if you don't like the bad press your new country represents, I'd suggest you pardon the one you had forsaken and maybe whip your arse back here? Oh sorry, maybe it doesn't represent enough field adrenaline for all you old wallabies...


hmmm...I see you don't know your own history missy

Since the time of William the Conqueror back in 1066 the only "non-royal foreigner" that has ever married into the British royal family was Mrs Wallace Simpson. That was a resounding disaster for Britain. This therefore is quite a historic moment.

The media will be digging into Meghan's past and even by tabloid standards her family is far from "average" quite a few rather eccentric individuals that would leave TV's Hyacinth Bucket in horror at the prospect of a dinner invite leave alone marrying into the cream of British aristocracy.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

04 Dec 2017, 12:38 am

Empathy wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Certainly a can of worms for the conservative British establishment
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... album.html


You're clearly self-medicating from your own can of worms and you've just snuck in some parasites with you.
Australia may be useless at cracking a joke, but we have our own Mick Dundee here on Royal Soil.
So, if you don't like the bad press your new country represents, I'd suggest you pardon the one you had forsaken and maybe whip your arse back here? Oh sorry, maybe it doesn't represent enough field adrenaline for all you old wallabies...

frankly speaking I have no idea what you are talking about???



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

04 Dec 2017, 4:47 am

Darmok wrote:
Harry and William seem to have turned out OK.


That's kinda the point. Theyre probably the last generation to turn out okay.

Nine descendants of Queen Victoria have already had hemophelia in the 20th Century.

Without some exogamy the future royals could end up like the Hapsburgs.



Empathy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,548
Location: Sovereign Nation & Commonwealth

04 Dec 2017, 6:55 am

cyberdad wrote:
Empathy wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Certainly a can of worms for the conservative British establishment
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... album.html


You're clearly self-medicating from your own can of worms and you've just snuck in some parasites .
Austalia, we have our own Mick Dundee here, so, if you don't like the bad press your new country represents, I'd suggest you pardon the one you had forsaken and maybe whip you.. Oh sorry, maybe it doesn't represent enough field adrenaline for all you old wallabies...
The media will be digging into Meghan's past and even by tabloid standards her family is far from "average" quite a few rather eccentric individuals that would leave TV's Hyacinth Bucket in horror at the prospect of a dinner invite leave alone marrying into the cream of British aristocracy.
There's no such thing as good press, just another cold head of state intervening into our affairs like Trumps Tantrum pursuits, unjustifiably acknowledging she is an activist and feminist. There is no twitter active trail to envisage an ex civilian returning home. It's like his bait with Obama, he kicked him to the road virtually.

My blood runs cold, when i think what actions could bewitch the crown, along with its future head of state, or behold a fugitive crowd at its peril. The whole Templeton affair has lost its charm on future British monarchs. Harry would prefer an heir to a princess over the throne, rather than counter risk what might happen if a bit of flirtatious charm, won the hearts over mind of the British Aristocracy and repatriated Monarchy that bears suit.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

04 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
Darmok wrote:
Without some exogamy the future royals could end up like the Hapsburgs.


To be fair Diana had a fair amount of genetic diversity



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

04 Dec 2017, 5:25 pm

That's why her boys turned out okay. Lol!

The Spencers were not Royals, but only nobles (though they had some royal ancestry). Not as common as us commoners, but a wider gene pool than the Royals. So even Princess Di was a step in the right direction. Lol!



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

04 Dec 2017, 8:22 pm

The "Queen Mother" (Elizabeth II's mother) wasn't as "stuffy" as Elizabeth II is.

She was considered a "liberal" woman for her time. She lived to be 100.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

05 Dec 2017, 12:20 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
The "Queen Mother" (Elizabeth II's mother) wasn't as "stuffy" as Elizabeth II is.

She was considered a "liberal" woman for her time. She lived to be 100.

Don't think so
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 74011.html



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

05 Dec 2017, 12:22 am

naturalplastic wrote:
That's why her boys turned out okay. Lol!

The Spencers were not Royals, but only nobles (though they had some royal ancestry). Not as common as us commoners, but a wider gene pool than the Royals. So even Princess Di was a step in the right direction. Lol!

true but the nobility still had their pedigrees and obsession of purity...just they have a wider gene pool to pick and choose compared to the Windsors