"White Civil Rights" Rally To Be Held Next To White House

Post Reply New Topic

we can't stoop to their level, even when they goad us. only if they back us into a corner can we afford to get medieval on them.

I suppose we shall see if Trump has any objections...

Part of that is not granting them a permit to hold a rally next to the white house.

He won’t. He’ll call them “fine people.”

I am certain that this something that is handled by the appointed bureaucrats, not by the President.

Yes I know, therefore the appointed bureaucrats should refuse to grant said permit.

I can't see them granting any permits to these individuals. It would be too chaotic and cause a public menace. And then if they do it anyways, the Feds can lock them up, hopefully thump some gourds, and fine the crap out of them.

Do you ever post anything but links to web pages? How about an executive summary or some representative quotes of what is found at the site?

Reading more on the link, was Charlottesville really in August?

In terms of impact it had on me in seeing it, I'd say it was close to (but not) 9/11 and Boston Marathon Bombing of my lifetime thus far. It still feels like yesterday.

If anyone thinks that's over reacting, try picturing it from the vantage point of a minority these groups target.

Caring about your own ethnicity and heritage is not racism!!

People have seen endless films about Nazis. Read endless books. The propaganda is relentless.

Save your energy for real racism!

Let me guess, that'd be the "racism against white people" right?

And the bold part, are you for real or did you just basically say "propaganda against Nazis is bad"?

Nazis are bad. It doesn't take media or books to tell people that, just basic level compassion for human beings.

Caring about ethnicity or heritage isn't bad - being obsessed with blood purity supremacy no matter who it's coming from: is.

'Nuff said.

The only thing white nationalists care about is who's ahead of them in the proverbial chow line.

they want the chow line for themselves only.

And everyone who doesn't fit the bill - they want to get rid of or exterminate in any way that they can.

For example, the reason they're hyped up on immigration right now is because they're scared that black people and white people are mixing together which means in the future - the dominant will be a mixed race. That's only "scary" to people obsessed with blood purity.

It is the selective propaganda. Let us see 20 films a year about life in Gaza. 20 films about life in Yemen.

It is only European countries and countries with a large white European population that are being forced to take in migrants/refugees from around the world.

Like Tony Blair's speech writer, Andrew Neather said, Labour were carrying out deliberate policies to make the UK "truly multicultural" and to "rub the right's nose in diversity and render their argument's out of date".

White Europeans have a right to be angry and it is not white supremacy or Nazism that is driving that. Sure, there are a lot of racists who share that anger but the anger is justified.

(1) The United States has participated in many wars. The one with little controversy (except to largely Nazis and their sympathizers) has always been the one where we fought and killed Nazis - thus, in media the enemy is often still: Nazis. It isn't "propaganda against white people," despite Nazis and their sympathizers often loving to claim that it is since most minorities and white people don't intrinsically link Nazis and white people. I'd actually call it racist when Nazis do try to link Nazism and white people - as in say, for example, that "Wolfenstein 2 is anti-white." Ant-Nazi isn't anti-white since most white people aren't nazis. For the masses, fighting Nazis is one of the strongest elements in our history where most no matter political side can literally say "America f- yeah!" and agree.

(2) There is nothing wrong with multiculturalism or diversity.

Others can take it from here. On my part, 'nuff said.