AJ is now even nuttier than usual.

Page 2 of 3 [ 37 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

29 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm

I like how you just completely ignored my post. Just confirms what I already knew. The right and the left need each other. The mainstream/corporate media and the Alex Jones types need each other. Watch this space.

_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"

Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

29 Jun 2018, 4:39 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

He isn't nutty he is a fraud. Occasionally he will cover some serious issues like Police violence, the police state, Bilderberg Etc. His crazy act discredits this coverage though, wouldn't surprise me if he was funded by shady people within the state.

Okay...

Let me get this straight. What you're saying.

So Alex Jones purposely makes himself into a laughingstock as part of a huge conspiracy to discredit conspiracy theorists. The deep state planted him on U Tube as part of their conspiracy to persuade us all that there are no conspiracies. The fact that we all laugh at Alex Jones means that we all have been duped by the conspiracy (to make conspiracies look laughable).

That's...good.

That's my favorite conspiracy theory to date! :lol:

Nope I am saying its a possibility. Think about it if you are part of the elite and up to something shady whats the best way to discredit your critics? Make them look insane.

The Rothschild family are probably the richest family in the world very secretive and connected to various governments yet when you try to look into them you get silly conspiracy theories like they own the fed or they are worth $500 trillion dollars when global wealth is $280 trillion.

So...you ARE saying that Alex Jones IS a plant by some nefarious group in a conspiracy to discredit all conspiracy theories.

No I am saying it is a possibility. It is a possibility you have blue eyes but I am not saying you have blue eyes.

Even suggesting that its a "possibility" implies that you're this:

But then....I am probably just one more part of that vast vast deep state conspiracy to convince the public that vast deep state conspiracy theories are all...kookoo for Cocoa Puffs. :lol:

Can you think of a better way to discredit potential critics than to make them look crazy?

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,961
Location:

29 Jun 2018, 4:47 pm

Daniel89 wrote:

Can you think of a better way to discredit potential critics than to make them look crazy?

Provide "evidence" that they are involved in a pedophilia conspiracy...

_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

29 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

So...you ARE saying that Alex Jones IS a plant by some nefarious group in a conspiracy to discredit all conspiracy theories.

No I am saying it is a possibility. It is a possibility you have blue eyes but I am not saying you have blue eyes.

Can you think of a better way to discredit potential critics than to make them look crazy?

You mean like the customer we had in that stationery store years ago who was using our photocopy machine to copy all of her documentation...of how her psychiatrist was psychotic, and that her psychiatrist had delusions that she (his patient, our customer)was crazy? I honestly don't know how far she got with her legal case. But it sounded like she was waging a loosing battle.

So you have actual evidence that they are doing this? Besides the "evidence" that "it might make sense that they would do it"?

Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

29 Jun 2018, 4:49 pm

Fnord wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

Can you think of a better way to discredit potential critics than to make them look crazy?

Provide "evidence" that they are involved in a pedophilia conspiracy...

Paedophilia discredits the person but not the idea.

Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

29 Jun 2018, 4:49 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

What are you talking about?

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,961
Location:

29 Jun 2018, 4:52 pm

Daniel89 wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

Can you think of a better way to discredit potential critics than to make them look crazy?

Provide "evidence" that they are involved in a pedophilia conspiracy...

Paedophilia discredits the person but not the idea.

"Ad Hominem" attacks are made when the idea cannot be refuted. Once the person who expresses the ideas is deemed "insane" or "criminal", then it's easier to discredit the idea as the mere ravings of a delusional or deceitful person.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

29 Jun 2018, 5:02 pm

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

What are you talking about?

I am sorry.

That they MIGHT be doing that(as if that makes any difference).

Your argument that it "makes sense that they would surpress all alternative media, but finance Alex Jones to discredit critics. Therefore the fact that it makes sense for them to do it is evidence that are actually doing it: that they have this vast infrastructure that surpresses vast amounts of media, but subsidizes one crazy guy on Utube.".

Last edited by naturalplastic on 29 Jun 2018, 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

29 Jun 2018, 5:04 pm

Fnord wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

Can you think of a better way to discredit potential critics than to make them look crazy?

Provide "evidence" that they are involved in a pedophilia conspiracy...

Paedophilia discredits the person but not the idea.

Hypothetically lets just the Royal family are part of a paedophile ring, now imagine a victim of this comes forward, the government could frame this person as a child rapist however if other people accused the Royals of being paedophiles people wouldn't associate the accuser with being a child rapist.

Now lets imagine they expected people may figure out they are paedophiles so they pay/blackmail someone to claim they are Lizards aliens, Lizard Aliens who molest children.

Now if that first guy who comes forward and accuses them of being paedophiles people will associate him with believing in Lizard Aliens.

Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

29 Jun 2018, 5:07 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

What are you talking about?

Nope. I didn't say they were doing it I don't need to provide evidence.

There is a possibility that there is life in the Alpha Centauri system. I am not saying there is I am saying it is a possibility and I do not need to provide evidence.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

29 Jun 2018, 5:12 pm

So the crazy conspiracy theories are all just plants to cover up the real conspiracies.

U tube is actually full of vids about how Queen Elizabeth is in fact an alien lizard creature.

So...Are these vids are all planted to distract us all from some real nefarious thing that the Queen is really doing(albeit something more mundane than being a lizard alien creature)?

If so what might that thing be? Just curious.

Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

29 Jun 2018, 5:15 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

Potentially the rumours were started by the Royal family.

Prince Andrew has been accused of Rape by an American girl and is connected to convicted paedophile Jeffery Epstein.

The fact the Queen is Queen is an injustice so making her critics look insane is a good way to discredit them.

Celifrog
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 38
Location: East Texas, United States

29 Jun 2018, 7:29 pm

lostonearth35 wrote:

I cannot STAND his voice! He sounds like he's a chronic smoker dying of lung and throat cancer. Would be wrong to say I hope he is? :twisted:

Really nice way to put it there.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

30 Jun 2018, 7:18 pm

Daniel89 wrote:

naturalplastic wrote:

The fact that the Queen is queen is an "injustice"? How so?

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

02 Jul 2018, 8:27 pm

Very likely Jones is a fraud with Anti-social Personality Disorder, and no one with an ounce of common sense would believe anything out of his mouth. That said, there are right wingers who hang on his every word, including our current President, by his own admission.

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Absolute
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

Joined: 4 Jul 2018
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 5

04 Jul 2018, 8:57 am

Most democrats and republicans are 2 sides of the same rotten coin.
They do the opposite of what they think in many important areas.

Trump, AJ, Killary, they're all witches to me.

Page 2 of 3 [ 37 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Jump to:

AJ is now even nuttier than usual. Post Reply New Topic

AJ is now even nuttier than usual.