It's all about Trump, as usual

Post Reply New Topic

Just peculiar your focus is on the negativity Trump and his supporters get rather than the kind they spew out. Haven’t seen you around a lot, but when I have it’s always defending Trump and his ilk which kinda creates an impression.

Oh no I must be one of THEM. Get out the torches and pitchforks.

Not saying definite, but it is peculiar that the only times I see you on here is when you’re defending Trump and his ilk. If it walks and talks like a duck... not saying you necessarily are, just from what I observed.

Also, if you were them I have every right to pick up a sledgehammer rather than a pitchfork. However, I don’t know where you fall.

Am I supposed to be feeling intimidated?

You just said you’re not a Trump supporter so if you’re not the answer is no. If you are, well that’s a whole other story. The right is one Malcolm X (or Magneto for those that don’t know his theology) away from all out war the likes of which they never could have predicted nor be prepared for; plus, they only have themselves to thank for gathering the storm.

Ah but you indicated I'm under suspicion, so if you decide the answer is yes what are you planning on doing to me?

I wouldn’t be afraid of what I’d do (which is obviously nothing) - I’d be afraid of the storm. Going after everyone who wasn’t a white/straight/Christian wasn’t the best move and minorities everywhere became more radicalized following 11/9. If a speaker like Malcolm X unites them, that’s a lot of power to wield and the right already planted the seeds for it.

As for a look at what that would be like - look no further than the LA Riots, Stonewall, Suffrage Black Friday, and a lot more combined. It’s happened in the past, it’ll happen again and this time minorities outnumber everyone else.

Thank goodness. I was starting to break out into a cold sweat.



So going after everyone who is a white/straight/Christian?

No doubt.

Do I think it going that widespread is excessive? Yes. But, also, I know many will group all together. Sociologically, that’s what happens - blind rage.

Considering white/straight/Christians, albeit some are good people I believe (see what I did there), oppressed minorities since the country first began - I wouldn’t say it’s unfounded either. There’s only so much a group of people can take and considering all of them are getting fed up... an uprising of some type isn’t just likely it’s a question of when. Sure there were some riots after the election, but nothing in comparison to the LA riots, 60s and 70s riots, and those from the 20s.

The one person here I know for sure is a white straight christian is Kraichgauer. Will they be going after just him, or his wife and kids also?

As said, blind rage. When flash events like the LA riots happened there were just attacks without forethought. If you want more information on how these kinds of events happen just research how violent the LA Riots were, I don’t have time to explain riot sociology.

In LA people were stopped on the streets, yanked out of cars, and beaten mercilessly- many died.

It wasn’t a pretty picture. Anyone who knows history knows what these flash catastrophes are like. If interested, do research.

We’re long overdue another one and there are already building ripples that it’ll happen again - especially if Trump somehow gets a second term and the predicted stock market crashes, those would definitely set it off.

I know a lot about it. Basically people looted and burned down their own neighborhoods. What did it accomplish? Who actually suffered the most from it?

It scared police and law departments into reform and even acquitting OJ for one. To understand that - it was set off by blacks seeking to scare law enforcement against discriminating against them. So goal, achieved. Granted, it was OJ Who was actually a monster - but law enforcement was so scared of reprisal they let a monster walk.

Stonewall, riot took place in their neighborhood too - but it made cops afraid and it did get them to leave them alone.

Soon after Black Friday riots, men started taking the Suffrage movement seriously because they were afraid.

FEAR is the goal.

Law enforcement chased down arrested and convicted OJ with no hesitation whatsoever. It was the jury who let him walk. And that was mainly because Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden did a horrible job.

Last edited by EzraS on 28 Sep 2018, 1:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

The jurors who were also swung by a corrupt court case that went in the black guy’s favor. However you may be too young to understand the historical significance of that. You grew up in a time where that could be a norm.

Here is more on how the LAPD was shaped after the riots:

https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/28/us/lapd- ... index.html

As said, brush up on your history kid. Everyone who was alive through it knows the impacts it made. There are many things taken for granted today, even for those who have experienced more oppressive times in history.

Also adding the modern Suffragettes will become undoubtably more radicalized if Kavanaugh gets in since many will see it as men sticking their middle finger up at them. One of the last time women were this angry - they fought back, physically.

Last edited by Spooky_Mulder on 28 Sep 2018, 1:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

You are the one who used OJ's as an example. What I know is that law enforcement lead by Mark Fuhrman wasn't the least bit afraid to arrest him and the reason cited for his acquittal was the abysmal job Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden did as the prosecution. That's from memory by the way. I also know judge Jackie Glass had no hesitation in giving OJ a 33 year sentence in 2008. What part of that history am I supposed to brush up on?

Last edited by EzraS on 28 Sep 2018, 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.