More racism from Joe Biden
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
And Biden sees black people as lesser humans and calls them bad parents who don't play enough music for their children. Liberals are the real racists.
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
I think neo-liberal corporatisation of government policy happened back in the Reagan era. From that point any US government (democrat or republican) was subject to lobby groups. Not surprisingly think tanks that are sympathetic to neo-liberal economic theory emerged throughout the western world. These groups advocate/advise politicians, referendums and political enquiries.
My point is conservatives in general (or on average) are more likely to espouse corporate agendas so at an empirical level are less representative of the average voter than a left leaning political party.
I think that's actually one of the things that hurt Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election was that people who came in droves to support Obama in 2012 abstained in 2016.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
Obama hardly has the bad environmental record that Trump has.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I think that's actually one of the things that hurt Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election was that people who came in droves to support Obama in 2012 abstained in 2016.
Why would they support her? She embodied everything that is wrong with our government.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
Obama hardly has the bad environmental record that Trump has.
Obama has a very bad one. He presided over a record increase in oil production, plus he was very pro-fracking. Basically, he did nothing to address climate change.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
Obama hardly has the bad environmental record that Trump has.
Obama has a very bad one. He presided over a record increase in oil production, plus he was very pro-fracking. Basically, he did nothing to address climate change.
I seriously hope you're not saying Trump has a better record than Obama, because he doesn't.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
Obama hardly has the bad environmental record that Trump has.
Obama has a very bad one. He presided over a record increase in oil production, plus he was very pro-fracking. Basically, he did nothing to address climate change.
I seriously hope you're not saying Trump has a better record than Obama, because he doesn't.
Is that your only point? I didn't even bring Trump into the conversation. Trump wouldn't even be in office if we had a party that truly cared about the environment and the people. He wouldn't be in office if the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries and foisted one of the worst candidates on us in American history.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
Obama hardly has the bad environmental record that Trump has.
Obama has a very bad one. He presided over a record increase in oil production, plus he was very pro-fracking. Basically, he did nothing to address climate change.
I seriously hope you're not saying Trump has a better record than Obama, because he doesn't.
Is that your only point? I didn't even bring Trump into the conversation. Trump wouldn't even be in office if we had a party that truly cared about the environment and the people. He wouldn't be in office if the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries and foisted one of the worst candidates on us in American history.
I brought up Trump to make the point that Obama's record, while maybe not sterling, was certainly better than Trump's.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
In terms of socioeconomic status there is a disproportionate number of black people who are poor, stating that isn't racist? he is being compassionate and sympathetic to their plight.
Oh, wake the f**k up! Biden is a corporately owned piece of s**t of politician who doesn't care about anyone else but himself. If you're really that ignorant, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Ok so the level of corporate ownership a politician has is on a spectrum. Democrats and left wing politicians are less in the pocket of political donors. Case in point...oil and coal industry give money predominantly to climate skeptic politicians in the republican party.
If that's the case, then explain to me why Obama had a worse record on the environment than his predecessor. Bush. Sorry, but the corporate takeover of the Democratic Party was pretty much complete by the. end of Bill Clinton's presidency. It's time for a complete bypass of the two criminal gangs posing as political parties. It gets tiresome just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic every four years.
Obama hardly has the bad environmental record that Trump has.
Obama has a very bad one. He presided over a record increase in oil production, plus he was very pro-fracking. Basically, he did nothing to address climate change.
I seriously hope you're not saying Trump has a better record than Obama, because he doesn't.
Is that your only point? I didn't even bring Trump into the conversation. Trump wouldn't even be in office if we had a party that truly cared about the environment and the people. He wouldn't be in office if the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries and foisted one of the worst candidates on us in American history.
I brought up Trump to make the point that Obama's record, while maybe not sterling, was certainly better than Trump's.
Well, that's like deciding which agonizing way to die is better. If I had to choose between dying from the Ebola virus or colon cancer...well, it's not an easy decision. I'll probably pick Ebola. While I'm sure having my innards turn to liquid s**t is horrible, it's over quicker than colon cancer.
Perhaps Trump is Ebola, and the Dems are colon cancer. Maybe it would be better if Trump got another four years and just finished the country off once and for all. This slow death is agonizing!
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
