Dylann Roof's lawyers appeal death sentence citing autism
His racism is the cause of his racism.
Autism at most may influence how interests are pursued. See Adam Lanza’s spreadsheet listing every mass school shooting going back to the 1800s.
Any diagnosis come by a defense lawyer hired psychologist needs to be treated with suspicion.
If he was bullied it was not by the people he murdered.
The Autism defense is used way to often and is hurting autistic people by creating yet another stereotype.
This.
It's getting really annoying to see sociopathy being represented as autism
_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
But kidding aside..
Apparently, like the Unabomber, Roof would rather die than get off on an insanity plea. But like Kozinski, his lawyers are trying to wrangle an insanity plea for him anyway.
But even if he really were proven to be autistic what does that have to do with his guilt (or lack thereof)?
Autism doesn't interfere with your ability to tell right from wrong.
Having delusions might interfere with your ability to tell right from wrong. But delusions are a symptom of psychosis, and not of autism.
If this becomes a precedent...killers avoiding capital punishment due to autism...that will be a disaster for the autistic community. Autistics should picket and demand the death penalty for him.
Could autism be responsible for his fixation on *white supremacy* ?
Autistic thinking is said to be more rigid, more black and white.
So?
What does that have to do not knowing right from wrong?
You could just as easily argue that "because autism causes obsessions, and black and white thinking, autistics are more likely than NTs to be obsessed with imitating Mother Theresa, and to do charity for the wretched and the poor, therefore autistics should be held to a higher moral standard than NTs and should serve longer prison sentences than NTs for the same crimes (like officers are shot for cowardice when they don't shoot privates)."
Autism doesn't kill people -- people kill people.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
His racism is the cause of his racism.
Autism at most may influence how interests are pursued. See Adam Lanza’s spreadsheet listing every mass school shooting going back to the 1800s.
Any diagnosis come by a defense lawyer hired psychologist needs to be treated with suspicion.
If he was bullied it was not by the people he murdered.
The Autism defense is used way to often and is hurting autistic people by creating yet another stereotype.
This.
It's getting really annoying to see sociopathy being represented as autism

Dylann Roof himself distinquishes between the two.
In the article he is quoted as saying "I am JUST a sociopath. Im not an autistic. That's for nerds".
We cant have nerds/aspies going around thinking that they are as good as....sociopaths...now can we!?
There Is No Autism Defense
I'm not certain meltdowns are just restricted to young adults . I've had times pre being on regular meds , via depot antipsychotic , when I've reacted very badly to negative stimuli/ being stressed because of it . It's not been a case of I'll try X to get Y . It's an acute reaction . It reaches a peak very quickly and then not too long afterwards dies out .
During those acute reactions I've never thought about killing someone .
_________________
Socially drifted middle class
Dylann Roof himself distinquishes between the two.
In the article he is quoted as saying "I am JUST a sociopath. Im not an autistic. That's for nerds".
We cant have nerds/aspies going around thinking that they are as good as....sociopaths...now can we!?
Yeah, how ironic is that?!
_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
Autistic thinking is said to be more rigid, more black and white.
So?
What does that have to do not knowing right from wrong?
You could just as easily argue that "because autism causes obsessions, and black and white thinking, autistics are more likely than NTs to be obsessed with imitating Mother Theresa, and to do charity for the wretched and the poor, therefore autistics should be held to a higher moral standard than NTs and should serve longer prison sentences than NTs for the same crimes (like officers are shot for cowardice when they don't shoot privates)."
It's not about "knowing right from wrong".
People can have uncontrollable behavior.
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
If only "White Supremacy" would be labelled and legislated as a form of insanity. Imagine how many people would have their firearms confiscated, and how many more would be forcibly medicated...
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
It's gonna be a tough go for DL's lawyers, since DL was found guilty of all charges and sentenced to death in federal court, and pleaded guilty and received nine life sentences to all counts in state court.
The lawyers would have to prove that the guilty plea was made under duress.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
People can have "uncontrollable behavior." Yet we can still punish them for it, right?
Autistic people get punished everyday for their behavior.
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
Autistic thinking is said to be more rigid, more black and white.
So?
What does that have to do not knowing right from wrong?
You could just as easily argue that "because autism causes obsessions, and black and white thinking, autistics are more likely than NTs to be obsessed with imitating Mother Theresa, and to do charity for the wretched and the poor, therefore autistics should be held to a higher moral standard than NTs and should serve longer prison sentences than NTs for the same crimes (like officers are shot for cowardice when they don't shoot privates)."
It's not about "knowing right from wrong".
People can have uncontrollable behavior.
Well actually it IS about knowing "right from wrong" if you're talking about the "insanity defense".
But lets go with your notion.
So lets say that something akin to the insanity defense can also be about "uncontrollable behavior".
Again:
So what?
What does that have to do with autism?
I am on the autism spectrum but I don't have an uncontrollable urge to mow down people in churches.
So walk me through your logic.
Autistic thinking is said to be more rigid, more black and white.
So?
What does that have to do not knowing right from wrong?
You could just as easily argue that "because autism causes obsessions, and black and white thinking, autistics are more likely than NTs to be obsessed with imitating Mother Theresa, and to do charity for the wretched and the poor, therefore autistics should be held to a higher moral standard than NTs and should serve longer prison sentences than NTs for the same crimes (like officers are shot for cowardice when they don't shoot privates)."
It's not about "knowing right from wrong".
People can have uncontrollable behavior.
Well actually it IS about knowing "right from wrong" if you're talking about the "insanity defense".
But lets go with your notion.
So lets say that something akin to the insanity defense can also be about "uncontrollable behavior".
Again:
So what?
What does that have to do with autism?
I am on the autism spectrum but I don't have an uncontrollable urge to mow down people in churches.
So walk me through your logic.
This is not about an "insanity defense".
This is regarding whether autism played a casual role, and he should be spared the death penalty.
It seems like the arguments presented here suggest, AUTISM CAN NEVER CAUSE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR?
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
Last edited by TheRobotLives on 30 Jan 2020, 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If autism played a "casual" role, then the sentence should stand.
If it can be proven that autism played a major "causal" role, then maybe I might advocate for a commutation to a life sentence. But I don't sense this is the case in this instance. I sense his racial prejudice had nothing to do with autism. Autism does not cause racial prejudice.
I can see how autism could contribute to some minor misdemeanour like jaywalking or forgetting to pay for something but I don't think you'll find many people who would agree that autism can cause someone to commit premeditated mass-murder.
_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Having Autism |
11 Jul 2026, 11:01 pm |
| Autism influencers on IG, X, TikTok, etc. |
15 Jul 2026, 3:36 am |
