"Trump is the most dangerous person we could have as preside
goldfish21 wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
"Trump is the most dangerous person we could have as president."
DNC: "Hold our keg."
Enter Biden.
Holy f*****g s**t! Now we get to choose between an as*hole and a senile fossil who completely embodies everything that is rotten about our government. This s**t is hilarious!
DNC: "Hold our keg."
Enter Biden.
Holy f*****g s**t! Now we get to choose between an as*hole and a senile fossil who completely embodies everything that is rotten about our government. This s**t is hilarious!
You sure like to complain an awful lot about all of your options for elective representatives for a man who hasn’t run for office. Why haven’t you? Why aren’t you running now?
Because I don't want to be a politician. I suppose I could be like you and ignore the obvious, but I prefer living in the real world.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
VegetableMan wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
"Trump is the most dangerous person we could have as president."
DNC: "Hold our keg."
Enter Biden.
Holy f*****g s**t! Now we get to choose between an as*hole and a senile fossil who completely embodies everything that is rotten about our government. This s**t is hilarious!
DNC: "Hold our keg."
Enter Biden.
Holy f*****g s**t! Now we get to choose between an as*hole and a senile fossil who completely embodies everything that is rotten about our government. This s**t is hilarious!
You sure like to complain an awful lot about all of your options for elective representatives for a man who hasn’t run for office. Why haven’t you? Why aren’t you running now?
Because I don't want to be a politician. I suppose I could be like you and ignore the obvious, but I prefer living in the real world.
In the real world, though, people who don’t like things do what’s within their power to change them instead of just complain about them forever.
Sure, I complain about politicians too, but you consistently complain about both major sides And the whole system and yet you never offer up any solutions or do anything yourself to right any of the wrongs you perceive.
Since you don’t want to be a politician I guess your best bet is simply voting for the best candidate you can.
_________________
No
goldfish21 wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
"Trump is the most dangerous person we could have as president."
DNC: "Hold our keg."
Enter Biden.
Holy f*****g s**t! Now we get to choose between an as*hole and a senile fossil who completely embodies everything that is rotten about our government. This s**t is hilarious!
DNC: "Hold our keg."
Enter Biden.
Holy f*****g s**t! Now we get to choose between an as*hole and a senile fossil who completely embodies everything that is rotten about our government. This s**t is hilarious!
You sure like to complain an awful lot about all of your options for elective representatives for a man who hasn’t run for office. Why haven’t you? Why aren’t you running now?
Because I don't want to be a politician. I suppose I could be like you and ignore the obvious, but I prefer living in the real world.
In the real world, though, people who don’t like things do what’s within their power to change them instead of just complain about them forever.
Sure, I complain about politicians too, but you consistently complain about both major sides And the whole system and yet you never offer up any solutions or do anything yourself to right any of the wrongs you perceive.
Since you don’t want to be a politician I guess your best bet is simply voting for the best candidate you can.
I do vote for the best politician; it's just never a Pub or Dem. You want to talk about solutions? How is propping up the status quo a solution. It's far more important to pay attention to what our politicians are actually doing and get involved -- like I've been doing since before you were old enough to even identify the United States on a map.
You bring disinformation and propaganda here on a daily basis with little apparent regret. The title of this thread alone is hilarious. You want to know would be worse than Trump? A more polished, competent politician with even more radical ideas.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
goldfish21 wrote:
At least you actually participate in the democratic system of government your country has by voting vs just criticizing and not doing what little you can.
Voting = right to complain. Carry on.
Voting = right to complain. Carry on.
Even if I didn't vote, I'd still have a right to complain. Voting has become little more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Karamazov wrote:
^ Who by?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
It’s a generations old common saying here. I don’t know it’s origins. It’s intended to get people to vote instead of just b***h about things. Vote for change and make your voice heard vs just complain to deaf ears.
_________________
No
goldfish21 wrote:
Karamazov wrote:
^ Who by?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
It’s a generations old common saying here. I don’t know it’s origins. It’s intended to get people to vote instead of just b***h about things. Vote for change and make your voice heard vs just complain to deaf ears.
But what if your vote doesn't really count like over here in the USA with our electorate college and certain states having more voting influence than others? Whoops I meant "Yay freedom!"
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Tw1ggy wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
Karamazov wrote:
^ Who by?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
It’s a generations old common saying here. I don’t know it’s origins. It’s intended to get people to vote instead of just b***h about things. Vote for change and make your voice heard vs just complain to deaf ears.
But what if your vote doesn't really count like over here in the USA with our electorate college and certain states having more voting influence than others? Whoops I meant "Yay freedom!"
Votes don’t count anywhere. You think voters determine the outcome of elections? No. It’s whoever counts and reports the vote tally.
_________________
No
goldfish21 wrote:
Karamazov wrote:
^ Who by?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
Why must a person be required to vote in order to voice an opinion upon the actions and behaviour of those elected?
Is not principled abstention a legitimate, informed political choice?
It’s a generations old common saying here. I don’t know it’s origins. It’s intended to get people to vote instead of just b***h about things. Vote for change and make your voice heard vs just complain to deaf ears.
It sounds suspiciously like the sort of thing a politician would say.
My RE teacher said it once, someone in class told the head of maths and he got quite cross: “why must I be compelled to support the careers of either pack of self-righteous idiots to be permitted to speak out about the state of my country?”
He left the lesson to go and have an argument with her about it!
I think he had a point really: their actions affect everyone, and therefore are everyone within a given country’s property & concern regardless of voting status (yes, I’m including non-naturalised immigrants, and illegal immigrants there: they may not have a right to vote, but their mere presence gives them an interest in the outcome)
goldfish21 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Karamazov wrote:
I’m not a fan of Mr Trump either: but I think the idea that there is no person on earth who both fulfils the requirements to run for the office he holds and would be worse in the conduct of that office is frightfully optimistic. 
I'm sure the Canadians would prefer Xi Jinping to be in control of the most powerful nation on earth.
Ya know because America and Canada share a border.
lol like Canadians get a choice in what Xi does. China has already infiltrated various levels of Canadian government and is buying up unfathomable amounts
of businesses and land in Canada. China will control Canada eventually.
OH NO!
Soy sauce flavoured maple syrup!
goldfish21 wrote:
Nah, they don’t have boots on the ground here. They don’t need to. They’ve taken over Canada without firing a shot. All they do is just keep sending money. Lots and lots of money. And a few smart people who’s job it is to infiltrate all levels of government, including college/university student governments, and control the narrative about China.
Surprisingly, America is a much bigger investor in Australia, than china.
Who would have thought?
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Pepe wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
Nah, they don’t have boots on the ground here. They don’t need to. They’ve taken over Canada without firing a shot. All they do is just keep sending money. Lots and lots of money. And a few smart people who’s job it is to infiltrate all levels of government, including college/university student governments, and control the narrative about China.
Surprisingly, America is a much bigger investor in Australia, than china.
Who would have thought?
Makes sense. America has a lot of investments in private prisons.
_________________
No
goldfish21 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
Nah, they don’t have boots on the ground here. They don’t need to. They’ve taken over Canada without firing a shot. All they do is just keep sending money. Lots and lots of money. And a few smart people who’s job it is to infiltrate all levels of government, including college/university student governments, and control the narrative about China.
Surprisingly, America is a much bigger investor in Australia, than china.
Who would have thought?
Makes sense. America has a lot of investments in private prisons.
My ancestry isn't English nor Irish, btw.
goldfish21 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Karamazov wrote:
I’m not a fan of Mr Trump either: but I think the idea that there is no person on earth who both fulfils the requirements to run for the office he holds and would be worse in the conduct of that office is frightfully optimistic. 
I'm sure the Canadians would prefer Xi Jinping to be in control of the most powerful nation on earth.
Ya know because America and Canada share a border.
lol like Canadians get a choice in what Xi does. China has already infiltrated various levels of Canadian government and is buying up unfathomable amounts
of businesses and land in Canada. China will control Canada eventually.
Australia is also slowly coning under the control of Beijing through economic reliance. Short term thinking leaders in politics and business have been selling Australia's crown jewels to China since the 1960s. Now we are reaping what we sowed.
