Firearms Stocks Drop In Value After 2020 Election.

Page 2 of 3 [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,096
Location: New York City (Queens)

10 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm

Tempus Fugit wrote:
That cartoon is a bit misleading. So far based on what I've seen regarding recent history, it's the anti-trump kids who have been the violent ones en masse.

Care to share any alleged examples of "en masse" violence by "anti-trump kids"? Please provide links to reputable sources.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm

Mona Pereth wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
That cartoon is a bit misleading. So far based on what I've seen regarding recent history, it's the anti-trump kids who have been the violent ones en masse.

Care to share any alleged examples of "en masse" violence by "anti-trump kids"? Please provide links to reputable sources.


Do I really need to post examples of the election riots of 2016, as if it isn't something most everyone saw on the news and knows about? Or the more recent Portland and similar riots? Am I leaping to too much of a conclusion that all those BLM, Antifa, defund the police et al rioters mostly consisted of those who are most likely anti-trump?





There's hundreds of hours of news footage like this, from virtually every news source on earth. Surely you must have seen some of it.



And now all the footage of all the post election MAGA rioters:



Last edited by Tempus Fugit on 10 Nov 2020, 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,286
Location: Right over your left shoulder

10 Nov 2020, 2:33 pm

Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
That cartoon is a bit misleading. So far historically it's the anti-trump kids who have been the violent ones en masse.


The tactics preferred by the far-right (mass shootings and targeted attacks with vehicles) only require a single attacker.


Single attackers act on their own. And blaming someone else for influencing their actions is like blaming their actions on video games or saying it's because they ate too many Twinkies


So I guess we don't need to interfere with ISIS or Al Qaeda's attempts to recruit and radicalize people online either, since they're all individuals acting with no influences whatsoever. :lol:


Far as I know usually when someone is acting for ISIS or Al Qaeda they are a subordinate following specific orders and instructions. And also usually ISIS or Al Qaeda takes credit for their actions.


Islamic terror attacks have included both directed and lone wolf attacks by self-radicalized individuals, just like domestic far-right terrorist incidents on American soil.


_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 2:40 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
That cartoon is a bit misleading. So far historically it's the anti-trump kids who have been the violent ones en masse.


The tactics preferred by the far-right (mass shootings and targeted attacks with vehicles) only require a single attacker.


Single attackers act on their own. And blaming someone else for influencing their actions is like blaming their actions on video games or saying it's because they ate too many Twinkies


So I guess we don't need to interfere with ISIS or Al Qaeda's attempts to recruit and radicalize people online either, since they're all individuals acting with no influences whatsoever. :lol:


Far as I know usually when someone is acting for ISIS or Al Qaeda they are a subordinate following specific orders and instructions. And also usually ISIS or Al Qaeda takes credit for their actions.


Islamic terror attacks have included both directed and lone wolf attacks by self-radicalized individuals, just like domestic far-right terrorist incidents on American soil.


You said what I said, self-radicalized individuals, as in acting on their own.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,286
Location: Right over your left shoulder

10 Nov 2020, 2:43 pm

Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
That cartoon is a bit misleading. So far historically it's the anti-trump kids who have been the violent ones en masse.


The tactics preferred by the far-right (mass shootings and targeted attacks with vehicles) only require a single attacker.


Single attackers act on their own. And blaming someone else for influencing their actions is like blaming their actions on video games or saying it's because they ate too many Twinkies


So I guess we don't need to interfere with ISIS or Al Qaeda's attempts to recruit and radicalize people online either, since they're all individuals acting with no influences whatsoever. :lol:


Far as I know usually when someone is acting for ISIS or Al Qaeda they are a subordinate following specific orders and instructions. And also usually ISIS or Al Qaeda takes credit for their actions.


Islamic terror attacks have included both directed and lone wolf attacks by self-radicalized individuals, just like domestic far-right terrorist incidents on American soil.


You said what I said, self-radicalized individuals, as in acting on their own.


The difference is I'm not willing to pretend that those who spread the ideologies that they embrace are blameless. Yes, we agree that those people aren't being directed by organizations, we seem to disagree on whether or not those who've contributed to their radicalization bear blame.


_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


Jakki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,839
Location: Outter Quadrant

10 Nov 2020, 2:50 pm

It is nice to know our moderators are capable of a sense of humour .


_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
Quote:
where ever you go ,there you are


Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,096
Location: New York City (Queens)

10 Nov 2020, 2:51 pm

Tempus Fugit wrote:
Do I really need to post examples of the election riots of 2016, as if it isn't something most everyone saw on the news and knows about? Or the more recent Portland and similar riots? Am I leaping to too much of a conclusion that all those BLM, Antifa, defund the police et al rioters mostly consisted of those who are most likely anti-trump?

Here's the thing: Right wingers insist on confusing nonviolent BLM protests with "riots". In fact the protesters were quite distinct from the looters. The latter were not protesters, but were criminal gangs taking advantage of the fact that the cops' attention was tied up with watching the protesters.

As for the antifa, there has been some occasional violence by them (e.g. punching Richard Spencer), but no one has been killed by them, as far as I am aware.

EDIT: Looking at your videos now. The Portland one appears to show violence by police, not by the protesters, as far as I can tell. I'll look at the others later.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


Last edited by Mona Pereth on 10 Nov 2020, 3:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 3:00 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
That cartoon is a bit misleading. So far historically it's the anti-trump kids who have been the violent ones en masse.


The tactics preferred by the far-right (mass shootings and targeted attacks with vehicles) only require a single attacker.


Single attackers act on their own. And blaming someone else for influencing their actions is like blaming their actions on video games or saying it's because they ate too many Twinkies


So I guess we don't need to interfere with ISIS or Al Qaeda's attempts to recruit and radicalize people online either, since they're all individuals acting with no influences whatsoever. :lol:


Far as I know usually when someone is acting for ISIS or Al Qaeda they are a subordinate following specific orders and instructions. And also usually ISIS or Al Qaeda takes credit for their actions.


Islamic terror attacks have included both directed and lone wolf attacks by self-radicalized individuals, just like domestic far-right terrorist incidents on American soil.


You said what I said, self-radicalized individuals, as in acting on their own.


The difference is I'm not willing to pretend that those who spread the ideologies that they embrace are blameless. Yes, we agree that those people aren't being directed by organizations, we seem to disagree on whether or not those who've contributed to their radicalization bear blame.


Contributed is a pretty loose term. If a shooter says "God made me do it", is his grandmother who took him to church guilty of contributing? I'm guessing you are saying Donald Trump is responsible for lone shooters, yes? I mean that's been an anti-trump approach right? That Trump is radicalizing his MAGA cult to an ISIS, Al Qaeda level of violence? That was supposed to take place the day he lost the election? He did lose, there's no point in continuing to campaign against him. It's over with.



Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 3:02 pm

Mona Pereth wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
Do I really need to post examples of the election riots of 2016, as if it isn't something most everyone saw on the news and knows about? Or the more recent Portland and similar riots? Am I leaping to too much of a conclusion that all those BLM, Antifa, defund the police et al rioters mostly consisted of those who are most likely anti-trump?

Here's the thing: Right wingers insist on confusing nonviolent BLM protests with "riots". In fact the protesters were quite distinct from the looters. The latter were not protesters, but were criminal gangs taking advantage of the fact that the cops' attention was tied up with watching the protesters.

As for the antifa, there has been some occasional violence by them (e.g. punching Richard Spencer), but no one has been killed by them, as far as I am aware.


It's amazing how a single sentence I typed expressing my opinion has lead to such a massive derail. I'm not god you know, what I think isn't some law you have to aggressively disprove.

Tell you what Mona and FXE, I take it back. Alright? Enough already.



Last edited by Tempus Fugit on 10 Nov 2020, 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

10 Nov 2020, 3:05 pm

Tempus Fugit wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Tempus Fugit wrote:
Do I really need to post examples of the election riots of 2016, as if it isn't something most everyone saw on the news and knows about? Or the more recent Portland and similar riots? Am I leaping to too much of a conclusion that all those BLM, Antifa, defund the police et al rioters mostly consisted of those who are most likely anti-trump?
Here's the thing: Right wingers insist on confusing nonviolent BLM protests with "riots". In fact the protesters were quite distinct from the looters. The latter were not protesters, but were criminal gangs taking advantage of the fact that the cops' attention was tied up with watching the protesters. As for the antifa, there has been some occasional violence by them (e.g. punching Richard Spencer), but no one has been killed by them, as far as I am aware.
It's amazing how one sentence I typed has lead to such a massive derail. Tell you what Mona and FXE, I take it back. Alright? Enough already.
No need for drama; just admit you are wrong.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 3:11 pm

Fnord wrote:
No need for drama; just admit you are wrong.


Wrong about what, that the anti-trump riots were committed by those who are anti-trump?



Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm

...



Last edited by Tempus Fugit on 10 Nov 2020, 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

magz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

10 Nov 2020, 3:32 pm

I'm afraid we're going back to the old problem of winged press.
The vast majority of BLM protests were peaceful, at least until their first indiscriminate pepper-spraying - a very unprofessional reaction, I'm really glad they didn't do it here when we had anti-gov protests a few weeks ago.
Looting did happen. Violence did happen. Police violence did happen. Peaceful protests did happen.
Now the media chose which parts to report.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

10 Nov 2020, 3:34 pm

I have been on an anti Trumper tirade this week time for an anti "woke" detour.

In a lot of revolutionary movements, there is the peaceful protest wing of people who are mostly legitimately anti-violent. All political movements need anti-violent rhetoric to gain the support or at least some sympathy from the comfortable. "Woke" is not a reform movement it is a revolutionary one because it seeks to change the fundamental understanding of America and its history and seeks to get rid of American institutions such as the nuclear family and the police and government and build replacements.

"Mostly peaceful protests" is both literally true and misleading. I have not read too many BLM and Antifa chapter heads denouncing their violent wings because their violent wings are not a bug they are a feature.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

10 Nov 2020, 3:43 pm

The bottom line is one side who's always saying how violent the other side is, has been far more involved in displaying acts of angry violence collectively on a large scale.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

10 Nov 2020, 3:44 pm

At least we now know who has imbibed of Trump's kool-aid...


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.