Biggest Lie of Our Century - WHO Vindicates China

Post Reply New Topic

Fnord, He's asking common sense questions, not scientific questions...

No investigator waits a whole year before investigating something, come on, you don't have to be a scientist to find this very odd.

Difficult job
A year on from when Wuhan entered lockdown, after the city has been repeatedly scrubbed and sanitized to wipe out any trace of the virus, there is skepticism over just how much the team of investigators will be able to uncover.
"It's very challenging for anybody to find out the cause of this," said Jin Dongyan, a virology professor at the University of Hong Kong. "It would be very difficult now to obtain any first line evidence to investigate the origin of the SARS-COV-2 and the index cases of Covid-19. It's really challenging. And I doubt these international experts can find anything. I'm not very optimistic."
To what extent the Chinese authorities are willing to cooperate is unclear, particularly as even senior health officials have begun to question whether the virus originated in Wuhan, advancing the "multiple origins" theory that was first put out by the country's propaganda organs in an apparent attempt to deflect blame over the initial handling of the pandemic.
Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that whether the WHO teams' trip would be successful "depends a lot on how much the government is willing to be cooperative and accommodating in terms of sharing the research, allow them to have access to places of interest, talking to people they want to speak with."
"The main problem is that this issue itself has been so politicized, makes it really difficult to conduct independent, transparent, thorough investigation," Huang said, adding that "the international society should also maybe lower their expectations, have a more realistic understanding of what this trip entails, especially given that they plan to wrap up the study in a few months, really we should not expect something magical."

The big question is though, why did the WHO waited for a whole year to start the investigation in Wuhan?

And if it really escaped the lab, do you think the Chinese regime would keep the traces there and let them find out? C'mon.

What the guy did in this video is called critical thinking, don't dismiss it just because it's on youtube.

1- Why after 1 year?
2- Why only 3 hours in lab
3- Don't you find that the fact that Wuhan lab did studies on bat-coronaviruses is an odd coincidence?

That alone raises a lot of alarm bells. And I think the WHO wasn't allowed in early in the pandemic.

I mean, theoretically, it's entirely possible that China's completely innocent but it certainly isn't behaving in a way that would support that claim.

You have an unusually strong need to defend 'the red state', no matter what the context.
Just an observation.

A tankie is anyone that defends authoritarian state-capitalist dictators and the atrocities they've committed and continue to commit.

The term was originally coined when the USSR sent Russian T54 tanks into Budapest, Hungary on the 4th of November 1956 to suppress a worker uprising. Factories had been taken over nationally by workers councils, in a demonstration of worker self-organization that was at odds with the Soviet's imperialist rule. The Soviet troops eventually suppressed the uprising and restored their rule. Then the USSR sent the tanks in to invade Czechoslovakia in 1968, and Afghanistan in 1979. A decade later, in 1989, tanks were similarly used by another state-capitalist regime to crush student dissidents in Tiananmen Square in China.

Anarchists use the word "tankie" to describe any supporter of authoritarian regimes that claim to be socialist. "Red fascist" is another popular term used in this context. The exception is Hitler's "national socialists", who are simply referred to as fascists. Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler initially represented himself as a socialist; realizing that appropriating socialism would be useful to gain popular support. Of course, his genocidal actions had nothing to do with establishing socialism, and his so-called "national socialist" ideology was just another form of collectivist-capitalism.

He sounds like a Tankie, aka a right winger who thinks he's a left winger.

He sounds like a Tankie, aka a right winger who thinks he's a left winger.