Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Sniper found dead after shooting 4 in D.C.

Page 2 of 2 [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,676
Location: Texas

25 Apr 2022, 5:39 pm

Personally, I think the gun laws here in Texas are way too strict.There should be one law about guns the 2A.Everyone should be able to open carry their bolt action deer rifle everywhere they go and drive and take it anywhere and everywhere.We should should put every murderer to death even for killing one person.



Last edited by Texasmoneyman300 on 25 Apr 2022, 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

25 Apr 2022, 5:50 pm

Most Americans don't think that way.

If they are gun owners, they tend to be CAREFUL gun owners.

It's when the wrong people get guns that problems arise.

Indeed, we must have stricter gun laws.



Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,676
Location: Texas

25 Apr 2022, 5:56 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Most Americans don't think that way.

If they are gun owners, they tend to be CAREFUL gun owners.

It's when the wrong people get guns that problems arise.

Indeed, we must have stricter gun laws.

I think we should be allowed to own all forms of conventional weapons used by all militaries on a individual basis.Fear the government that has strict gun laws.I think everyone has the right to own whateverr kind of gun they want.I think illegal gun should be a oxymoron.Ihink it should legal for me to own a bolt action 20mm rifle.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,297
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Apr 2022, 6:55 pm

The gub'mint shouldn't be able to limit my right to bear nuclear arms. :evil:


_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,676
Location: Texas

25 Apr 2022, 7:16 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
The gub'mint shouldn't be able to limit my right to bear nuclear arms. :evil:

lol haha.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,297
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Apr 2022, 8:17 pm

Texasmoneyman300 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
The gub'mint shouldn't be able to limit my right to bear nuclear arms. :evil:

lol haha.


I mean, I'm only half-kidding. On the one hand a monopoly on legitimate use of force and restrictions on what arms citizens are entitled to possess is a fundamental part of how states operate, on the other hand I'm not always sure I believe states are required given the inherent surrendering of freedoms they require and how ultimately violent coercion and the threat of violence is how it's all maintained.

I've never seen a nuclear armed state face any real violence from other nuclear armed entities. If everyone is a nuclear armed entity that should level the playing field, no? :chin:


_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,676
Location: Texas

25 Apr 2022, 9:32 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Texasmoneyman300 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
The gub'mint shouldn't be able to limit my right to bear nuclear arms. :evil:

lol haha.


I mean, I'm only half-kidding. On the one hand a monopoly on legitimate use of force and restrictions on what arms citizens are entitled to possess is a fundamental part of how states operate, on the other hand I'm not always sure I believe states are required given the inherent surrendering of freedoms they require and how ultimately violent coercion and the threat of violence is how it's all maintained.

I've never seen a nuclear armed state face any real violence from other nuclear armed entities. If everyone is a nuclear armed entity that should level the playing field, no? :chin:

That seem sensible to make sense to me.My solution to that is getting int o the micronation movement.Apparently its a thing.But if i were to ban a type of gun it would be handguns.Because that is what u would be most effective if you wanted to lower the murder rate.Like believe it or not ammo that u buy from the interne thatt is hunting ammo is illegal for militaries to use.