cyberdad wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Oh no, you've drank the same kool-aid on Ukraine as Tim Pool.

I mean if Israel/Mossad is responsible then they need to take responsibility for civilian casualties. What is does illustrate is that hezbollah (like HAMAS) hide/camouflage in civilian areas so the operation (assuming it was Israel) was not precise enough to not avoid civilian casualties.
What it shows is that an attack of this nature can't possibly be done in a manner that limits casualties to only legitimate targets and that Israel doesn't actually give a s**t about inflicting casualties on non-combatants.
Your response (along with your history on this topic) shows that you consistently take Israel's claims at face value no matter how poorly they stand up to even basic critical thinking.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.