DeaconBlues wrote:
Censorship, my friend, has nothing to do with it. Every moment on every "reality" show is edited in order to cause the audience to react to the character- excuse me, the "real person" there, in the fashion desired by the show's writer- er, producer. That segment was deliberately left in the tape, chosen from moments probably spanning days but edited down to fit into 42 minutes of airtime.
That is irrelevant. The dude is clearly an idiot. Why not show the world what an idiot he is? Why cut out the footage of him behaving like the idiot he is? It's not CBS's job to make this guy look like less of an idiot. They're not in the business of promoting this guy. They're in the business of promoting the advertisers by keeping viewers glued to the set. They got footage of this guy being an idiot. They got footage of conflict. Conflict is drama. Drama is what keeps viewers glued to the set. The idiot man does not speak for CBS, he speaks for himself, providing CBS with conflict much like a written antagonist would. Cutting out his worst displays of idiotic behavior wouldn't be good for anyone but him. He'd seem like less of a jerk. He wouldn't look so bad. What's the point of that? The guy's an idiot. Why not let the world know?
DeaconBlues wrote:
Unless we're to believe that this "Adam" fellow did even worse things in the moments we didn't see (drown kittens? Fashion nooses and hang them from crosses? Dress up like an SS trooper?), then CBS does indeed owe our community an apology, for giving this punk a nationwide forum for his bigotry.
That could have been a point if they didn't clearly show him as the antagonist, which they did. It was obvious that he was the bad guy. He has the right to say what the f*ck he wants, what he doesn't have is the right to sound like he's right when doing so. People aren't gonna watch it and go "hey, that's a nice fella - I think I'm gonna start acting more like him", they're gonna go "that guy is an insensitive dick and possibly a compulsive liar", which in my opinion isn't a problem.
DeaconBlues wrote:
The right to speak freely does not imply the right to a broadcast soapbox.
No, but to some extent being on a reality show does. And CBS are not obligated in any way to make this guy look good.