Page 2 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 May 2008, 3:41 pm

Alaspi wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Alaspi wrote:
I understand what you mean by nothing can be said to the contrary. But I don't understand how this thread is pointless or troll-bait. I did not intend for this to be an agrument.


I understand that and I'm not going to argue. Just, it is not fair to make a thread like this: whoever says anything against could get banned, so people may only say things in favor of it.

As for the topic:
although I ideologically disagree with such a relationship,
I do hope that they may have a happy relationship.


Thanks for clarifying. :D And I do apologize if I offended anyone.


Not a problem. :)



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

24 May 2008, 1:12 am

so. . .we can not exhibit homophobia on WP?

is that what that means?

I didn't mean to violate the rules by posing John McCain's homophobic comments. (i.e.irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals.)

I apologize for bringing the YouTube link into the thread, I would feel horrible if I were not able to express my true feelings because I would not like to make other people feel uncomfortable, and did not realize I was setting up a situation where someone could not respond.

sincerely,
Merle

and I would like to congratulate the happy couple!


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

24 May 2008, 6:52 am

Since I began posting about this issue on WP, I have had a change of heart. I believe I have become a better man and indeed a better Christian. I realized the nastiness and hatred in myself and recoiled from it. Until a controversy like this shows you a human face, you can remain callous and uncaring.

IMO whatever the Bible says against sexual morality and homosexuality is at once overridden, superseded by the commandment to love one another as ourselves, to forgive, not to be hyporcrites, etc. Jesus gave these commandments personally. The new covenant replaces the old covenant. In his day, Jesus sociliazed with outcasts and untouchables and was despised for it.

I am still in a moral quandary. I want to remain loyal to the church, but I now find some of its laws to be unconscionable. These laws have been around long enough to fossilize and become like stone. Unyielding. Can we make this monumental change without destroying Christianity?
The church, however mighty and impervious to time, has had to keep up with changing times. It must again make a profound change or die.

Adapt or die. That's a scary proposition for anyone. Part of the church is indeed a dinosaur, a bony relic, a scaly old skin to be moulted.

It's youth and life are worth saving. Amen, everyone.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

24 May 2008, 10:19 am

slowmutant wrote:
Since I began posting about this issue on WP, I have had a change of heart. I believe I have become a better man and indeed a better Christian. I realized the nastiness and hatred in myself and recoiled from it. Until a controversy like this shows you a human face, you can remain callous and uncaring.

IMO whatever the Bible says against sexual morality and homosexuality is at once overridden, superseded by the commandment to love one another as ourselves, to forgive, not to be hyporcrites, etc. Jesus gave these commandments personally. The new covenant replaces the old covenant. In his day, Jesus sociliazed with outcasts and untouchables and was despised for it.

I am still in a moral quandary. I want to remain loyal to the church, but I now find some of its laws to be unconscionable. These laws have been around long enough to fossilize and become like stone. Unyielding. Can we make this monumental change without destroying Christianity?
The church, however mighty and impervious to time, has had to keep up with changing times. It must again make a profound change or die.

Adapt or die. That's a scary proposition for anyone. Part of the church is indeed a dinosaur, a bony relic, a scaly old skin to be moulted.

It's youth and life are worth saving. Amen, everyone.


Amen indeed, slowmutant! I commend you to the living God that resides in the heart and not in the dusty tomes and cathedral cages of the codified past.

your friend,
Merle


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


YowlingCat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,004

24 May 2008, 3:28 pm

Slowmutant, what an awesome thing to realize and act upon. Way to go.



Alaspi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 893
Location: Seattle

24 May 2008, 5:27 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Since I began posting about this issue on WP, I have had a change of heart. I believe I have become a better man and indeed a better Christian. I realized the nastiness and hatred in myself and recoiled from it. Until a controversy like this shows you a human face, you can remain callous and uncaring.

IMO whatever the Bible says against sexual morality and homosexuality is at once overridden, superseded by the commandment to love one another as ourselves, to forgive, not to be hyporcrites, etc. Jesus gave these commandments personally. The new covenant replaces the old covenant. In his day, Jesus sociliazed with outcasts and untouchables and was despised for it.

I am still in a moral quandary. I want to remain loyal to the church, but I now find some of its laws to be unconscionable. These laws have been around long enough to fossilize and become like stone. Unyielding. Can we make this monumental change without destroying Christianity?
The church, however mighty and impervious to time, has had to keep up with changing times. It must again make a profound change or die.

Adapt or die. That's a scary proposition for anyone. Part of the church is indeed a dinosaur, a bony relic, a scaly old skin to be moulted.

It's youth and life are worth saving. Amen, everyone.


You are very well spoken. :D

I believe religion will never die. It's been around for as long as people have and somehow it has changed as people have, so I have no doubt that eventually things will balance out...I'm only worried about how.


_________________
Never hug tomorrow someone you could hug today.

Hugging is natural, organic, naturally sweet, free of pesticides and preservatives. Hugging contains no artificial ingredients. It's 100% wholesome. No calories, no caffeine, no nicotine.


LeKiwi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,444
Location: The murky waters of my mind...

25 May 2008, 6:11 am

Firstly, congratulations to the happy couple, and congratulations to another state and another country (hopefully, eventually) finally accepting that love is love, and we all have the right to have that recognised - you can't distinguish between romantic love between people of the same or opposing sexes; it's just love, pure and simple. The sooner it's accepted the free-er we'll be to love even more strongly and more openly and more happily. Love heals.


slowmutant wrote:
Since I began posting about this issue on WP, I have had a change of heart. I believe I have become a better man and indeed a better Christian. I realized the nastiness and hatred in myself and recoiled from it. Until a controversy like this shows you a human face, you can remain callous and uncaring.

IMO whatever the Bible says against sexual morality and homosexuality is at once overridden, superseded by the commandment to love one another as ourselves, to forgive, not to be hyporcrites, etc. Jesus gave these commandments personally. The new covenant replaces the old covenant. In his day, Jesus sociliazed with outcasts and untouchables and was despised for it.

I am still in a moral quandary. I want to remain loyal to the church, but I now find some of its laws to be unconscionable. These laws have been around long enough to fossilize and become like stone. Unyielding. Can we make this monumental change without destroying Christianity?
The church, however mighty and impervious to time, has had to keep up with changing times. It must again make a profound change or die.

Adapt or die. That's a scary proposition for anyone. Part of the church is indeed a dinosaur, a bony relic, a scaly old skin to be moulted.

It's youth and life are worth saving. Amen, everyone.


Well spoken, and well done.

The way I see it, you have to take into consideration the fact that over the 2,000-5,000 years or so since the bible was put together, society has changed more than any of the people who wrote it could probably have ever dreamed. It was written with a society long gone in mind, that only shadows and tiny remnants of remain. If God and Jesus are as loving and accepting as they're meant to be, I'm sure they'd understand that some of these things have to change alongside the people they're written for. If it's something that won't hurt other people - as is the general rule - then I'm sure they wouldn't condemn it. Do homosexual relations really hurt other people? Have they ever? No more than any heterosexual relations have - so why would there be any reason to condemn it in this day and age? This is love we're talking about!! :)


_________________
We are a fever, we are a fever, we ain't born typical...


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

25 May 2008, 7:04 am

Eh, I don't agree with what Ellen argued.


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

25 May 2008, 11:57 am

I think the more people drop this holier than thou attitude to marriage an put it on a pedestal and more towards just making a choice between two people the better.

Good luck to them I don't know much about ellen. I like the name portia because it is my favourite spider.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

25 May 2008, 12:18 pm

Needless to say this is not a clear-cut issue. The issue of same-sex unions will not be easily resolved and should not, IMO, be viewed as black and white. There are all kinds of ambiguities here, moral, social, political, and religious. There is much gray area here, a whole quagmire of it.

I'm still conflicted about it. Where to redraw the lines of right and wrong, if these lines can in fact be drawn absolutely? I don't know. Should Christianity be put to the sword in favour of something else? I don't know. Dogma isn't always about right and wrong. Pomp and ceremony don't always serve the public interest.

If faith and politics weren't so hopelessly intertwined, it might be easier on the head and easier on the heart for same-sex unions to fully absorb into the Christian collective entity.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

25 May 2008, 12:42 pm

Massachusetts allowed same sex marriage and guess what. .

nothing happened!
few out side of the affected group even noticed
no heterosexual's life changed it was (as my friend in MA said) "a non-issue"

I see it as a civil rights issue. Because what if they decided people on the autistic spectrum should not marry nor reproduce. Just because it was 'morally wrong.'
That would be a civil rights issue to me.

Merle



Alaspi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 893
Location: Seattle

25 May 2008, 1:18 pm

sinsboldly wrote:
I see it as a civil rights issue. Because what if they decided people on the autistic spectrum should not marry nor reproduce. Just because it was 'morally wrong.'
That would be a civil rights issue to me.

Merle


Good point. If that were the case then I think I would dig myself a hole and never come out because of a feeling of being morally wrong. As far as I know I was born the way I am and it isn't fair to say that I (and others) am automatically morally wrong from birth.


_________________
Never hug tomorrow someone you could hug today.

Hugging is natural, organic, naturally sweet, free of pesticides and preservatives. Hugging contains no artificial ingredients. It's 100% wholesome. No calories, no caffeine, no nicotine.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

25 May 2008, 6:46 pm

Alaspi wrote:
sinsboldly wrote:
I see it as a civil rights issue. Because what if they decided people on the autistic spectrum should not marry nor reproduce. Just because it was 'morally wrong.'
That would be a civil rights issue to me.

Merle


Good point. If that were the case then I think I would dig myself a hole and never come out because of a feeling of being morally wrong. As far as I know I was born the way I am and it isn't fair to say that I (and others) am automatically morally wrong from birth.


Well, in Romans we're all of Adam (Hebrew word for Humankind in fact[Adam, a human. Adamim, many humans.]), so in that respect we are ALL morally wrong from birth. Christ is our hope of restoration of relationship to God and not works.

PS: that's the way I see it, you don't have to accept it. I'm saying this because of Quatermass' accusations against my sister and me.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

25 May 2008, 7:53 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Alaspi wrote:
sinsboldly wrote:
I see it as a civil rights issue. Because what if they decided people on the autistic spectrum should not marry nor reproduce. Just because it was 'morally wrong.'
That would be a civil rights issue to me.

Merle


Good point. If that were the case then I think I would dig myself a hole and never come out because of a feeling of being morally wrong. As far as I know I was born the way I am and it isn't fair to say that I (and others) am automatically morally wrong from birth.


Well, in Romans we're all of Adam (Hebrew word for Humankind in fact[Adam, a human. Adamim, many humans.]), so in that respect we are ALL morally wrong from birth. Christ is our hope of restoration of relationship to God and not works.

PS: that's the way I see it, you don't have to accept it. I'm saying this because of Quatermass' accusations against my sister and me.


There is a small island in the South Pacific. The priests give the humans the right to life and death by controlling how and when the crops are planted and what portion of the crops go to the people and what portion goes to the priests. The people are convinced this must be the way of it in order to please the deity. I have been able to apply the dynamic to every religion I have been introduced to. I don't respect the forced coercion on the South Pacific Island and I don't respect any other religion that would do the same.

Any religion that says we were damned from just existing in this dimension gets no respect in my book. How insulting that must be to God!

Merle



LeKiwi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,444
Location: The murky waters of my mind...

25 May 2008, 8:08 pm

Couldn't have put it better, Merle.

Seriously, what kind of a God says you're damned from the word 'go'? That's not a God of love, that's a God of hate and coercian and spite. Not to mention classing entire groups of people as sinners on top of that simply for being who they are. A horrible religion if those are two of the most basic tenets.


_________________
We are a fever, we are a fever, we ain't born typical...


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

25 May 2008, 10:10 pm

sinsboldly wrote:

Merle


That is because you like creating idols. If you cannot understand why the great majority of people will not find "salvation" there is no point in following a religion.



To remain on topic: Ellen cannot dance. If she gets "married" she better learn how.


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.