Matrix-Style Brain downloads 'will make lessons pointless'

Page 2 of 2 [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

02 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm

Good point, parakeet. :)



LoveableNerd
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 380
Location: USA

02 Jun 2008, 4:10 pm

No, and I suspect that is why they are estimating 30 years. Otherwise, the technology is already available.


_________________
Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.---George Bernard Shaw

8th Cmdmt: Thou Shalt Not Steal.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

02 Jun 2008, 4:16 pm

What hypothetical interface will be used?



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

02 Jun 2008, 4:19 pm

In the movie, they used a cranial jack and plugged the interface right into the person's grey matter.



LoveableNerd
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 380
Location: USA

02 Jun 2008, 4:28 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What hypothetical interface will be used?


I suspect it will be eletrodes planted into the brain. Google "monkey uses brain power to feed itself" to see the progress already made in this area. By 30 years from now, they will probably be nanoscopic in size and can be injected - no need for surgery. And from what I gleaned from the article, they will have wireless receivers to receive the data, so no need for a jack.


_________________
Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.---George Bernard Shaw

8th Cmdmt: Thou Shalt Not Steal.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

02 Jun 2008, 4:35 pm

LoveableNerd
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 380
Location: USA

02 Jun 2008, 4:38 pm

Odin wrote:
You two are being paranoid. New technology DOES NOT inevitability lead to a totalitarian state in which everyone is brainwashed and has RFID chips in them, luddites that claim so are being stupid.


No, the new technology by itself doesn't mean that at all. The track record of our current government and where it is going is evidence of the coming police state. Which is much closer than you think. Here is another new technology, from Raytheon, that I'm sure will never be used to suppress us.

Quote:
Pentagon Tests Raygun On Mock Anti-War Protesters
Pain compliance device used to disperse crowd as military-industrial complex tools up to deal with dissenters

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, June 2, 2008

The Pentagon proudly displayed what it has in store for anti-war protesters last night during a CBS 60 minutes feature which depicted the use of the army's "Active Denial System" against peace demonstrators at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia.

The Active Denial System is a giant raygun that directs a sizzling hot beam at its target, causing instant pain and forcing the subject(s) to disperse.

Similar to the Taser, the machine acts as a form of pain compliance or torture. It was designed in secret for 10 years before being unveiled in 2001.

The CBS clip alarmingly shows mock American peace protesters being targeted by the device.

The CBS report fails to mention the fact that the device was already mobilized and place on stand-by to combat protesters during the 2004 National Republican Convention in New York City, as is documented in Alex Jones' film Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State.

As Raw Story highlights, "Failure to deploy the weapon as planned (In Iraq) has raised suspicions that the real intention is to use it for domestic crowd control."

"In 2006, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne was quoted as saying that the device should be used first on Americans, because "if we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation. ... If I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press."

A smaller scale version of the device named "Silent Guardian" is also being developed by Raytheon for use in "law enforcement, checkpoint security, facility protection, force protection and peacekeeping missions."

The use of mock role players in martial law training exercises is nothing new, the precedent stretches back at least ten years.

Documentarian and radio talk show host Alex Jones has has attended numerous military urban warfare training drills across the U.S. where role players were used to simulate arresting American citizens, confiscating their weapons, and taking them to internment camps. Actors scream out that they have constitutional rights as they are handcuffed and hauled off to the detainment facility.

Legislation has already been passed that paves the way for the U.S. military to engage American citizens on home soil.

The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."

Police state expert Frank Morales traced the ancestry of the bill back to "Operation Garden Plot" and the United States Civil Disturbance Plan 55-2, now de-classified programs dating back to the 80's which outlined how the military would be involved in suppressing domestic civil disobedience in America. The groups listed as potential non-conformist troublemakers included tax protesters, militia groups, religious cults, and various other general anti-government dissenters.


_________________
Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.---George Bernard Shaw

8th Cmdmt: Thou Shalt Not Steal.