Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

so I have to agrree?

Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

09 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm

twoshots wrote:
BABE RATING! NO GIRLS ALLOWED!
slowmutant wrote:
Angelina Jolie

No. Absolutely not.

philosopherBoi wrote:
Ok not really attractive in any way, in my eyes if I am going to look at a woman I would prefer Janet Jackson or Calpernia Adams. I think that all judging should be done by gay men from now on, we can give an objective opinion.

Objective? That's like asking me to rate how hot men are. Case in point: you just suggested Janet Jackson. O.o


Um. what? I have no say because I am a girl? I'm pansexual, and I think she is certainly not the hottest girl, and definitely NOT angelina Jolie.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

09 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm

ShadesOfMe wrote:
twoshots wrote:
BABE RATING! NO GIRLS ALLOWED!
slowmutant wrote:
Angelina Jolie

No. Absolutely not.

philosopherBoi wrote:
Ok not really attractive in any way, in my eyes if I am going to look at a woman I would prefer Janet Jackson or Calpernia Adams. I think that all judging should be done by gay men from now on, we can give an objective opinion.

Objective? That's like asking me to rate how hot men are. Case in point: you just suggested Janet Jackson. O.o


Um. what? I have no say because I am a girl? I'm pansexual, and I think she is certainly not the hottest girl, and definitely NOT angelina Jolie.

Just kidding. Anyway, a vote against Angelina Jolie automatically makes your opinion count for something.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

09 Oct 2008, 11:53 pm

twoshots wrote:
ShadesOfMe wrote:
twoshots wrote:
BABE RATING! NO GIRLS ALLOWED!
slowmutant wrote:
Angelina Jolie

No. Absolutely not.

philosopherBoi wrote:
Ok not really attractive in any way, in my eyes if I am going to look at a woman I would prefer Janet Jackson or Calpernia Adams. I think that all judging should be done by gay men from now on, we can give an objective opinion.

Objective? That's like asking me to rate how hot men are. Case in point: you just suggested Janet Jackson. O.o


Um. what? I have no say because I am a girl? I'm pansexual, and I think she is certainly not the hottest girl, and definitely NOT angelina Jolie.

Just kidding. Anyway, a vote against Angelina Jolie automatically makes your opinion count for something.


There is just something really, really, cold about her. She's just not..."right". something strikes me as seriously off about her.