Macbeth wrote:
Because Barbie is the ultimate in brilliant rolemodels for girls, obviously. With her physically impossible legs, and cripplingly improbable breasts, and awesome teenage motherhood. Yes, exactly what any girlchild needs as an example. I think I would rather have the independent girl who knows her own mind as an example than this vomit-inducing genitally impaired ludicrous plastic whore. Barbie has been Kens b***h since 1952. At least Bratz try to be their own woman.
Barbie is just another sad example of some form of 1950's perfect woman housekeeping stereotype. Welcome to the world of A la carte kitchens, where the b***h cooks, and knows her place.
Oh, can the neo-feminism! No, barbie isn't exactly ideal, but that doesn't make the li'l whore culture a preferable alternative. I've seen far too much little girl ass to think this "independent" crap is a good idea. No, half naked ten year old's walking about the street are not "empowered", far closer to ultra-jailbait - for the discerning paedophile!
It's not "independence", it's mimicry, and obscene for that age group.
_________________
Oh, well, fancy that! Isn't that neat, eh?