beneficii wrote:
Harassment and threats often go together.
Which is in no way proof of her actually being threatened. People shouldn't be accused of doing something they didn't based on the possibility or even probability that they might do it.
beneficii wrote:
It's ridiculous that a woman can't take her shirt off on her private property, and it looks like the authorities ended up doing the right thing.
She can, the law was on her side and she got reparations for the mistake made by the police.
beneficii wrote:
And to the false equivalence you put out, masturbating in full view of someone where you are meant to be seen and where it is directed toward that person, is very different from a woman who got a bit overheated and without really thinking about it took off her shirt. Context and intent matter here.
Neither Ezra or I said it was the same thing. I was the one going on a tangent since I was curious about how the law (in different places) sees these things.
beneficii wrote:
And yes, it's a double standard that men can go around topless, but women can't.
Agreed. Where I live they both can.
_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley