goldfish21 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I am concerned that there are cases of people getting infected more than once which means the effectiveness of the first vaccine will be questionable.
There may be a cycle of lockdowns (as we are seeing currently throughout Europe) and at some point a country will have to take the brave decision that Sweden made and decide that herd immunity might be better than complete social collapse.
Lol yeah except they still only have something like 5-7% of their population with antibodies and a death rate that’s far higher than neighbouring nations. How you see this as the “correct approach,” is beyond me. They still need like 15-18x more people to get COVID-19 to achieve herd immunity, which would likely translate to the same multiple of additional deaths.
Meanwhile, society is not collapsing in countries that have opted to slow the spread via lockdowns, masks, and social distancing until an effective vaccine is available.
Sweden's intention was on the right track but their methodology was flawed (that's how I saw it).
If you actually interpret what their chief epidemiologist is currently saying it revolves primarily around the ethics of trying to attain herd immunity rather than the intention. I feel they could have adjusted their policy to reduce the high death rate earlier using some common sense parameters.
However lockdowns might only delay the death rate as there is still no guarantee any vaccine available in 2021 will be able to maintain antibodies to COVID-19 for those already susceptible to the virus.