Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Celebrities beg Republican electors: Don't vote Trump

Page 12 of 12 [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Previous topic | Next topic

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

24 Dec 2016, 10:29 pm

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.

Well if you put that way - "every dog has his day"



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Dec 2016, 10:43 pm

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.


Dehumanizing vulnerable people in need, are we now?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

24 Dec 2016, 11:52 pm

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.

Are you referring to liberals as " rotten scumbags,pieces of crap subhuman parasites"?
Hate much?



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

25 Dec 2016, 12:30 am

Misslizard wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.

Are you referring to liberals as " rotten scumbags,pieces of crap subhuman parasites"?
Hate much?


No. I was using intentional hyperbole. Since the conservatives call people names, then the plan is to turn the tables and invent a bunch of names to call them in order to make them (mainly white male conservatives) the target group. It's being the thing they're supposedly fighting against. They the conservatives are the scumbags, the deplorables (the newest made up word to use as a discriminatory label), the fascists, the Nazis and so on.

But of course since I'm a teenager, you can just disregard anything I have to say.



Last edited by EzraS on 25 Dec 2016, 12:46 am, edited 2 times in total.

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

25 Dec 2016, 12:34 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.


Dehumanizing vulnerable people in need, are we now?


What is that supposed mean?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

25 Dec 2016, 12:47 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.


Dehumanizing vulnerable people in need, are we now?


What is that supposed mean?


The right is always calling those in need depending on the social safety net parasites, and treat them as less than human. That was what I thought you were getting at, as said right always hope it's in the cards to punish those without whenever they get a Great White Hope elected President.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

25 Dec 2016, 1:33 am

EzraS wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.

Are you referring to liberals as " rotten scumbags,pieces of crap subhuman parasites"?
Hate much?


No. I was using intentional hyperbole. Since the conservatives call people names, then the plan is to turn the tables and invent a bunch of names to call them in order to make them (mainly white male conservatives) the target group. It's being the thing they're supposedly fighting against. They the conservatives are the scumbags, the deplorables (the newest made up word to use as a discriminatory label), the fascists, the Nazis and so on.

But of course since I'm a teenager, you can just disregard anything I have to say.

I wouldn't disregard it becuse of your age.Just wasn't sure what you meant.
Sounds like an accurate description of crooked policiticians on both sides.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

25 Dec 2016, 6:20 am

Various posts in this thread have been reported by various members. At this stage it may be that the thread has wandered off the specific topic into conflict. It may be locked if new incidents occur which generate multiple reports. Peace!



BaalChatzaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,050
Location: Monroe Twp. NJ

25 Dec 2016, 10:11 am

B19 wrote:
Various posts in this thread have been reported by various members. At this stage it may be that the thread has wandered off the specific topic into conflict. It may be locked if new incidents occur which generate multiple reports. Peace!


It was all for naught. The "unfaithful electors" did not cost Trump a single electoral vote. It cost Hillary two electoral votes. Most of the "faithless" were Democrats.


_________________
Socrates' Last Words: I drank what!! !?????


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

25 Dec 2016, 11:24 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Are you suggesting the conservatives "don't" brand groups of people? intolerance is the hallmark of social conservatism, when you leave the teenage bubble you live in this should become apparent to you


Right and the tables have been turned on those rotten scumbags, pieces of crap subhuman parasites.


Dehumanizing vulnerable people in need, are we now?


What is that supposed mean?


The right is always calling those in need depending on the social safety net parasites, and treat them as less than human. That was what I thought you were getting at, as said right always hope it's in the cards to punish those without whenever they get a Great White Hope elected President.


Sure.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

25 Dec 2016, 11:26 am

BaalChatzaf wrote:
B19 wrote:
Various posts in this thread have been reported by various members. At this stage it may be that the thread has wandered off the specific topic into conflict. It may be locked if new incidents occur which generate multiple reports. Peace!


It was all for naught. The "unfaithful electors" did not cost Trump a single electoral vote. It cost Hillary two electoral votes. Most of the "faithless" were Democrats.



According to what I read, Trump lost 2 and Clinton lost 5.