TheRobotLives wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
The left believes in *inclusion*.
Think you're X, then you're X.
What is wrong with social inclusion?
Rachel Dolezal thinks she's X, somehow some of the left want to be *exclusionary* (discriminatory).
Exclusionary in what way? I though inclusion is the mantra of the left

I'm pretty certain the left is inclusive.
And yet, the left discriminated against Rachel for being trans-racial.
The left, or the NAACP? It wasn't 'the left' that fired her for lying even if some individual leftists are critical of her attempt to pass herself off as someone she isn't. Other folks on the left basically shrug and think it was pointless to remove someone who's clearly interested in advancing civil rights even if she's got some issues going on.
It appears you're inaccurately trying to paint the entire left as a monolithic bloc on this matter.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning. — Warren Buffett