Obama Orders Review of Cyber Attacks

Page 13 of 18 [ 275 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 18  Next

wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

17 Dec 2016, 4:33 am

Dox47 wrote:
wilburforce wrote:
Logic and facts do not prevail.


I don't think those words mean what you think they do.


:P


_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War

(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Dec 2016, 4:41 am

beneficii wrote:
In light of the recent information, I would recommend the GOP electors vote for a 3rd candidate they can agree on; hopefully, enough will do so to throw this election to the House. Hopefully, by the time of the election in the House, enough information will have come to light on what should be done.


So basically you're saying at this time, there's insufficient information.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

17 Dec 2016, 6:26 am

naturalplastic wrote:
So....If Ted Kennedy were alive today Kennedy could be Trump's chauffeur, while Cheney could be Trump's hunting guide (double the odds, and make it a bipartisan thing. lol!)!

:D, bipartisanship is a good thing.

EzraS wrote:
So basically you're saying at this time, there's insufficient information.

So basically you are saying that your government is untrustworthy. This must be why Trump is appealing, as he is going to strip it down to its bones. Over a hundred years of contributions by thousands of people vs. Trump. Yeah, Trump's the one to back. (sarcasm)

Darmok wrote:
Not sure how he can do that, as I understand he isn't the president any more.

The inauguration is on January 20.

wilburforce wrote:
Logic and facts do not prevail. This really is the Post-Truth era.

I blame "The Me Generation" otherwise known as the baby boomers. The '60s was their teenage years and the values that began there are playing out today. In this case with regard to the overvaluing of the individual at the expense of authority and knowledge. Society is degenerating into it's individual parts and all that matters to people is the realization of their self expression. Truth is secondary to self-expression.

Raptor wrote:
Perhaps you could just not read my threads, or would that be too difficult?

Since when is this your thread?



JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

17 Dec 2016, 12:30 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
So one of the only pure things was when you fought each other? Lol. It'd be nice if that was all true about WWII. Things aren't as simple as that.
Are you serious? Obama has done bombed innocent civilians across the world, supported numerous massacres and wars as well as funding organ eating head chopping child rapists because his masters are against any Arab nationalists. Obama should be locked up with Bush and the rest of them.


And those Arab nationalists haven't done bad things ever?


The US doesn't attack countries because the leaders are bad people. It supports Saudi Arabia and Israel, the worst two countries in the region.


So we're supposed to attack a loyal allie?


:roll: So at least you're admitting that the level of a state's evilness is irrelevant, the US will be allies with anyone as long as it suits their regional needs. Which means that attacking people has nothing to do with the state's crimes either. And i'm not sure how loyal these allies are. Israel has attacked the US on numerous occasions. Without question in 1967 when they bombed a US intelligence ship and tried to blame it on Egypt. And the Saudis have funded ISIS and Al Qaeda who are allegedly the US's enemies.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

17 Dec 2016, 12:37 pm

androbot01 wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Perhaps you could just not read my threads, or would that be too difficult?

Since when is this your thread?

Pretty obvious I meant my posts...


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

17 Dec 2016, 12:40 pm

Raptor wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Perhaps you could just not read my threads, or would that be too difficult?

Since when is this your thread?

Pretty obvious I meant my posts...

Ah, that makes sense. I'm not 100% right now. I have flu for the second time this winter and it is so cold. Everything is a bit foggy.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Dec 2016, 5:06 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
So one of the only pure things was when you fought each other? Lol. It'd be nice if that was all true about WWII. Things aren't as simple as that.
Are you serious? Obama has done bombed innocent civilians across the world, supported numerous massacres and wars as well as funding organ eating head chopping child rapists because his masters are against any Arab nationalists. Obama should be locked up with Bush and the rest of them.


And those Arab nationalists haven't done bad things ever?


The US doesn't attack countries because the leaders are bad people. It supports Saudi Arabia and Israel, the worst two countries in the region.


So we're supposed to attack a loyal allie?


:roll: So at least you're admitting that the level of a state's evilness is irrelevant, the US will be allies with anyone as long as it suits their regional needs. Which means that attacking people has nothing to do with the state's crimes either. And i'm not sure how loyal these allies are. Israel has attacked the US on numerous occasions. Without question in 1967 when they bombed a US intelligence ship and tried to blame it on Egypt. And the Saudis have funded ISIS and Al Qaeda who are allegedly the US's enemies.


I never said attacking enemies has nothing to do with state crimes.
And I will concede, the Saudis are only allies of convenience. When we develop and alternative fuel source, we can and should cut our ties to them. As for Israel - I know of only one incident in which they had attacked a US battleship, and that was more of a major f*ck up than a purposeful act. But right now, Israel if the only stable democracy in the region, and the only one that we know will be our allie today, and the next day, and the next. That, and all the fundies and holy rollers who buy into the millennialist horsesh*t, would start screaming hysterically that Jesus won't forgive America for cutting Israel loose when he comes back.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

17 Dec 2016, 5:24 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
The US will be allies with anyone as long as it suits their regional needs.

All nation states do the same. There is no shock horror here.

JohnPowell wrote:
Which means that attacking people has nothing to do with the state's crimes either.

All nation states have national security who act in the national interest

JohnPowell wrote:
And i'm not sure how loyal these allies are. Israel has attacked the US on numerous occasions. Without question in 1967 when they bombed a US intelligence ship and tried to blame it on Egypt.

Overestimating Israel's actions. The US have no international ally that is stronger than Israel. Suggesting that the US is somehow blissfully unaware of Mossad's actions against the US is ludicrous

JohnPowell wrote:
And the Saudis have funded ISIS and Al Qaeda who are allegedly the US's enemies.

Not forgetting Pakistan's support for the Taliban. I think oil/resource prices would be badly effected if the corrupt leadership in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia were deposed in a coup and replaced with muslim brotherhood type fanatics



JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

17 Dec 2016, 6:26 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
So one of the only pure things was when you fought each other? Lol. It'd be nice if that was all true about WWII. Things aren't as simple as that.
Are you serious? Obama has done bombed innocent civilians across the world, supported numerous massacres and wars as well as funding organ eating head chopping child rapists because his masters are against any Arab nationalists. Obama should be locked up with Bush and the rest of them.


And those Arab nationalists haven't done bad things ever?


The US doesn't attack countries because the leaders are bad people. It supports Saudi Arabia and Israel, the worst two countries in the region.


So we're supposed to attack a loyal allie?


:roll: So at least you're admitting that the level of a state's evilness is irrelevant, the US will be allies with anyone as long as it suits their regional needs. Which means that attacking people has nothing to do with the state's crimes either. And i'm not sure how loyal these allies are. Israel has attacked the US on numerous occasions. Without question in 1967 when they bombed a US intelligence ship and tried to blame it on Egypt. And the Saudis have funded ISIS and Al Qaeda who are allegedly the US's enemies.


I never said attacking enemies has nothing to do with state crimes.
And I will concede, the Saudis are only allies of convenience. When we develop and alternative fuel source, we can and should cut our ties to them. As for Israel - I know of only one incident in which they had attacked a US battleship, and that was more of a major f*ck up than a purposeful act. But right now, Israel if the only stable democracy in the region, and the only one that we know will be our allie today, and the next day, and the next. That, and all the fundies and holy rollers who buy into the millennialist horsesh*t, would start screaming hysterically that Jesus won't forgive America for cutting Israel loose when he comes back.


When you cut ties, we will start to hear how evil they are and then you'll probably attack them. In 1954 Israel planned a load of terrorist attacks against the British, Americans and Egyptians and planning to blame it on the Muslim Brotherhood and "Egyptian Communists". But the plan failed and they just blamed it all on the defense minister.
The only f*ck up was that some of the American crew survived to tell the story. The intelligence ship would have been able to confirm that Israel were lying about their reasons for starting the 1967 war, so Israel attacked the ship for 3 hours even though there were American flags on it and the Americans were waving at the planes. Israel isn't a democracy and it certainly isn't stable. You give them $11 million a day, probably due to blackmail.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

17 Dec 2016, 6:30 pm

cyberdad wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
The US will be allies with anyone as long as it suits their regional needs.

All nation states do the same. There is no shock horror here.

JohnPowell wrote:
Which means that attacking people has nothing to do with the state's crimes either.

All nation states have national security who act in the national interest

JohnPowell wrote:
And i'm not sure how loyal these allies are. Israel has attacked the US on numerous occasions. Without question in 1967 when they bombed a US intelligence ship and tried to blame it on Egypt.

Overestimating Israel's actions. The US have no international ally that is stronger than Israel. Suggesting that the US is somehow blissfully unaware of Mossad's actions against the US is ludicrous

JohnPowell wrote:
And the Saudis have funded ISIS and Al Qaeda who are allegedly the US's enemies.

Not forgetting Pakistan's support for the Taliban. I think oil/resource prices would be badly effected if the corrupt leadership in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia were deposed in a coup and replaced with muslim brotherhood type fanatics


I know. It has nothing to do with "national interest" it has to do with the interest of the military industrial complex, bankers and multinational corporations who control each state.

I didn't say they were unaware so don't put words in my mouth. Allies don't bomb and blackmail each other.

You understand that there are more options than that? The US has always tried to destroy Arab nationalists that help the people of the region, well apart from when JFK was in charge and supported Nasser....


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
So one of the only pure things was when you fought each other? Lol. It'd be nice if that was all true about WWII. Things aren't as simple as that.
Are you serious? Obama has done bombed innocent civilians across the world, supported numerous massacres and wars as well as funding organ eating head chopping child rapists because his masters are against any Arab nationalists. Obama should be locked up with Bush and the rest of them.


And those Arab nationalists haven't done bad things ever?


The US doesn't attack countries because the leaders are bad people. It supports Saudi Arabia and Israel, the worst two countries in the region.


So we're supposed to attack a loyal allie?


:roll: So at least you're admitting that the level of a state's evilness is irrelevant, the US will be allies with anyone as long as it suits their regional needs. Which means that attacking people has nothing to do with the state's crimes either. And i'm not sure how loyal these allies are. Israel has attacked the US on numerous occasions. Without question in 1967 when they bombed a US intelligence ship and tried to blame it on Egypt. And the Saudis have funded ISIS and Al Qaeda who are allegedly the US's enemies.


I never said attacking enemies has nothing to do with state crimes.
And I will concede, the Saudis are only allies of convenience. When we develop and alternative fuel source, we can and should cut our ties to them. As for Israel - I know of only one incident in which they had attacked a US battleship, and that was more of a major f*ck up than a purposeful act. But right now, Israel if the only stable democracy in the region, and the only one that we know will be our allie today, and the next day, and the next. That, and all the fundies and holy rollers who buy into the millennialist horsesh*t, would start screaming hysterically that Jesus won't forgive America for cutting Israel loose when he comes back.


When you cut ties, we will start to hear how evil they are and then you'll probably attack them. In 1954 Israel planned a load of terrorist attacks against the British, Americans and Egyptians and planning to blame it on the Muslim Brotherhood and "Egyptian Communists". But the plan failed and they just blamed it all on the defense minister.
The only f*ck up was that some of the American crew survived to tell the story. The intelligence ship would have been able to confirm that Israel were lying about their reasons for starting the 1967 war, so Israel attacked the ship for 3 hours even though there were American flags on it and the Americans were waving at the planes. Israel isn't a democracy and it certainly isn't stable. You give them $11 million a day, probably due to blackmail.


Israel isn't stable? They've avoided all the coups and rebellions that have toppled governments in all the surrounding neighbor states, and I don't foresee any such violent domestic take over in Israel anytime soon.
And sure, Israel might have had plans to attack their allies - but every country in the world has to seriously consider the fact that their friends might not always be their friends.
And yes, Israel is a democracy. Everyone with Israeli citizenship, both Jews and Arabs, has a vote, and has a right to hold public office. I am well aware of the fact that Palestinian Israelis, and Palestinians more often than not live as second class citizens, and have to put up with unendurable bullsh*t. But instead of reacting in a positive way with non-violent protest, too often they've been involved in, or supported, terrorism, which only brings about reprisals from the Israeli government. That said, I will concede that destroying the family home of a terrorist is overkill, and does nothing but create more terrorists.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

17 Dec 2016, 7:13 pm

Lol, because Israel is one of the countries supporting the coups. They have carried out airstrikes against Assad. All of the destruction of neighboring states is for the benefit of Israel and the US. But really, please stop replying to me now, I have no interest in wasting anymore of my time.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Dec 2016, 7:21 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Lol, because Israel is one of the countries supporting the coups. They have carried out airstrikes against Assad. All of the destruction of neighboring states is for the benefit of Israel and the US. But really, please stop replying to me now, I have no interest in wasting anymore of my time.


Or maybe I'll keep replying to torment you! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Dec 2016, 7:36 pm

The headline on the local newspaper today:

Obama says Putin behind hacking that helped Trump

A couple of days before the electors vote. Coincidence? I think not.

They didn't say anything until now because they didn't want to affect the election lol.

The drama never ends haha.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

17 Dec 2016, 9:13 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
You understand that there are more options than that? The US has always tried to destroy Arab nationalists that help the people of the region, well apart from when JFK was in charge and supported Nasser....


Pan Arab nationalism was nurtured by the CIA in the 1940s and 50s as a bulwark against the spread of communism



JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

17 Dec 2016, 9:52 pm

cyberdad wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
You understand that there are more options than that? The US has always tried to destroy Arab nationalists that help the people of the region, well apart from when JFK was in charge and supported Nasser....


Pan Arab nationalism was nurtured by the CIA in the 1940s and 50s as a bulwark against the spread of communism


So the US other threw a democratically elected leader in Iran who was nationalising their oil against the interests of global oil companies because of communism? :lol: :lol:


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"