8 dead in Atlanta area massage parlors shootings

Page 14 of 14 [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

31 Mar 2021, 8:44 am

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
Sylkat wrote:
He loaded a weapon and walked out his door with it, planning to kill people.
Then he did so.
Some people go to their doctor, getting psychotropics to help with mental/emotional/psychological problems, or to get a referral for counseling.
He did not.
He killed people.
His problems/issues/compulsions are not a reason for people to die.


True but this heinous crime isn't a justification for fabricating a story to smear others for their skin color and religious beliefs. The hate and lies must end. We cannot tolerate it. We are better than that.


The killer isn't being smeared for his skin colour.

There's been a trend of violence against East Asian diaspora. This spree killing occurred during that trend, so speculation that it's part of the pattern isn't unwarranted and is based on that trend not on the race of the perpetrator.


I didn't say the killer was being smeared for his skin color. Don't make stuff up to justify hate.


Really? So who's been smeared for their skin colour? :?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

31 Mar 2021, 8:56 am

funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
The victims of those who make excuses for racists, express support for racists, or who try to deny racism altogether.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Last edited by Fnord on 31 Mar 2021, 9:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

31 Mar 2021, 9:02 am

Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
Anyone who makes excuses for racists, expresses support for racists, or who tries to deny racism altogether.


I'd suggest those people were criticized for their ideological positions, not for their skin colour. At the end of the day no one really cares what the racist/denier/fellow traveller looks like, just what they espouse.

Did I misread Daddy's statement or was it fair to interpret what he wrote as a claim that someone had been smeared for their skin colour and religious beliefs? If it wasn't the killer than who was it who was smeared? Of course if no one was smeared then it was just another dishonest claim made with the intention of distraction.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

31 Mar 2021, 9:03 am

funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
Anyone who makes excuses for racists, expresses support for racists, or who tries to deny racism altogether.


I'd suggest those people were criticized for their ideological positions, not for their skin colour. At the end of the day no one really cares what the racist/denier/fellow traveller looks like, just what they espouse.

Did I misread Daddy's statement or was it fair to interpret what he wrote as a claim that someone had been smeared for their skin colour and religious beliefs? If it wasn't the killer than who was it who was smeared? Of course if no one was smeared then it was just another dishonest claim made with the intention of distraction.
You ninja'ed me just as I was correcting the post.
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
The victims of those who make excuses for racists, express support for racists, or who try to deny racism altogether.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

31 Mar 2021, 9:32 am

funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
Anyone who makes excuses for racists, expresses support for racists, or who tries to deny racism altogether.


I'd suggest those people were criticized for their ideological positions, not for their skin colour. At the end of the day no one really cares what the racist/denier/fellow traveller looks like, just what they espouse.

Did I misread Daddy's statement or was it fair to interpret what he wrote as a claim that someone had been smeared for their skin colour and religious beliefs? If it wasn't the killer than who was it who was smeared? Of course if no one was smeared then it was just another dishonest claim made with the intention of distraction.


Let me be very clear. When one assumes with no evidence to know what happened in a crime including motives and who is guilty only based skin color, religious beliefs, gender and/or sexual orientations it is racism and/or bigotry targeting all people of the same skin color, religion, gender and/or sexual orientation.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

31 Mar 2021, 9:36 am

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
Anyone who makes excuses for racists, expresses support for racists, or who tries to deny racism altogether.
I'd suggest those people were criticized for their ideological positions, not for their skin colour. At the end of the day no one really cares what the racist/denier/fellow traveller looks like, just what they espouse. Did I misread Daddy's statement or was it fair to interpret what he wrote as a claim that someone had been smeared for their skin colour and religious beliefs? If it wasn't the killer than who was it who was smeared? Of course if no one was smeared then it was just another dishonest claim made with the intention of distraction.
Let me be very clear. When one assumes with no evidence to know what happened in a crime including motives and who is guilty only based skin color, religious beliefs, gender and/or sexual orientations it is racism and/or bigotry targeting all people of the same skin color, religion, gender and/or sexual orientation.
Let me be clear: When evidence points to a murderer targeting his victims by race, then it is more than reasonable to assume (1) he is a racist, and (2) the skin color of his victims was part of his racial profiling.

You are defending an obvious racist by denying his obvious racism.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

31 Mar 2021, 9:38 am

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
Anyone who makes excuses for racists, expresses support for racists, or who tries to deny racism altogether.


I'd suggest those people were criticized for their ideological positions, not for their skin colour. At the end of the day no one really cares what the racist/denier/fellow traveller looks like, just what they espouse.

Did I misread Daddy's statement or was it fair to interpret what he wrote as a claim that someone had been smeared for their skin colour and religious beliefs? If it wasn't the killer than who was it who was smeared? Of course if no one was smeared then it was just another dishonest claim made with the intention of distraction.


Let me be very clear. When one assumes with no evidence to know what happened in a crime including motives and who is guilty only based skin color, religious beliefs, gender and/or sexual orientations it is racism and/or bigotry targeting all people of the same skin color, religion, gender and/or sexual orientation.


The killer's guilt was never in question here, only their motives. It's not unreasonable to consider that this attack might be part of that broader pattern of attacks, even if it turns out not to be. No one was smeared or slandered, at worst a murderer's motives were speculated upon in more detail than they should have been.

You might want to save your big speech for when that's actually what's occurred to avoid looking like the boy who cried wolf when and if what you're claiming has occurred actually occurs.



Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

31 Mar 2021, 9:55 am

funeralxempire wrote:

You might want to save your big speech for when that's actually what's occurred to avoid looking like the boy who cried wolf when and if what you're claiming has occurred actually occurs.


So you lose the argument and then predictably attack me with childish nonsense. Discussion over.



Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

31 Mar 2021, 10:01 am

Fnord wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
... So who's been smeared for their skin colour?
Anyone who makes excuses for racists, expresses support for racists, or who tries to deny racism altogether.
I'd suggest those people were criticized for their ideological positions, not for their skin colour. At the end of the day no one really cares what the racist/denier/fellow traveller looks like, just what they espouse. Did I misread Daddy's statement or was it fair to interpret what he wrote as a claim that someone had been smeared for their skin colour and religious beliefs? If it wasn't the killer than who was it who was smeared? Of course if no one was smeared then it was just another dishonest claim made with the intention of distraction.
Let me be very clear. When one assumes with no evidence to know what happened in a crime including motives and who is guilty only based skin color, religious beliefs, gender and/or sexual orientations it is racism and/or bigotry targeting all people of the same skin color, religion, gender and/or sexual orientation.
Let me be clear: When evidence points to a murderer targeting his victims by race, then it is more than reasonable to assume (1) he is a racist, and (2) the skin color of his victims was part of his racial profiling.

You are defending an obvious racist by denying his obvious racism.


So provide real evidence that this was a racist attack and that racial profiling of victims actually happened. And no his religious beliefs, skin color and neckbeard isn't evidence. Claiming those things to be evidence of a crime is clear bigotry.

Let's have it.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

31 Mar 2021, 10:24 am

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:

You might want to save your big speech for when that's actually what's occurred to avoid looking like the boy who cried wolf when and if what you're claiming has occurred actually occurs.


So you lose the argument and then predictably attack me with childish nonsense. Discussion over.


Sorry, if you're going to insist on lying you're going to have your lies identified as such. You've been insisting the killer was unfairly slandered and yet haven't made anything resembling an honest and coherent argument. None of your ranting and attempts at name-calling those who have tried to discuss whether or not racism was a motive has actually made the case that racism wasn't a motive or shouldn't be considered as a possible motive.

If you're able to make an honest argument you won't have to worry about dishonest arguments undermining your credibility. Of course, that advice only matters if you desire credibility; if your goal is just to troll you're doing a fine job of it.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

31 Mar 2021, 10:39 am

funeralxempire wrote:
... If you're able to make an honest argument you won't have to worry about dishonest arguments undermining your credibility.  Of course, that advice only matters if you desire credibility; if your goal is just to troll you're doing a fine job of it.
Seconded.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Mr Reynholm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,363
Location: Tulsa, OK

31 Mar 2021, 11:43 am

This "Blame Everything on Racism" mentality lacks a core of principals. It is simply a reactionary response meant to demonize certain persons with whom one disagrees with politically.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

31 Mar 2021, 7:50 pm

Fnord wrote:
People seem determined to deny hate crimes regardless of evidence.


I'm happy to stand corrected once evidence contradicting his (the shooter's) claim for a motive is published. Until then the burden of proof is with the anti-Asian camp.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

01 Apr 2021, 9:58 am

cyberdad wrote:
Fnord wrote:
People seem determined to deny hate crimes regardless of evidence.
I'm happy to stand corrected once evidence contradicting his (the shooter's) claim for a motive is published. Until then the burden of proof is with the anti-Asian camp.
The shooter was white.  The majority of victims were Asian.  That much evidence is proof enough for me.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


magz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

01 Apr 2021, 1:07 pm

Locked for review.

ED: After the review, the thread will remain locked.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Last edited by magz on 06 Apr 2021, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.: update