magz wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
magz wrote:
Yup, I'm afraid Biden's pacifism is misplaced - just as I opposed leaving Afghanistan, for what Afghans suffer now is worse than what they had during the occupation..
Why is it our business to decide what the Afghan people want? Did you know a US ally Pakistan propped up the Taliban insurgency? Did you also know that the Afghans hate foreign occupation forces even more than Somali and Iraqi people?
I watch the news and sanctions work. the Taliban is softening their position against women. The current Taliban leadership want to reach out to the rest of the world. They know what happens when they oppress their people or meddle in foreign national security by supporting international terror.
I have contact only with Afghans who had to flee. As you may imagine, they would disagree.
Hard to find out "what the nation wants" without fair elections.
Did it occur to you that refugees who flee from a war torn coutnry are always going to have a negative view of the regime that caused them to flee in the first place. Whether it means the west has an obligation to intervene is another matter.
I have posted about how the world allowed separatist groups representing legitimate movements fighting human rights violations in countries like India, Sri Lanka, Burma, Indonesia as well as various countries in South America and in Africa were allowed to be murdered/killed in the name of "anti-terrrorism with the full support of the US and Europe.
Sorry, just because they are blonde children pictured by journalist escaping the Russians doesn't make them more important than other places.