Melania Avoiding Trump over Emerging Sex Scandal

Page 20 of 21 [ 326 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

25 Mar 2018, 5:15 am

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

25 Mar 2018, 5:21 am

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Because he did 1 or 2 bad things. Trump is a vile human being 24/7 and has done 98723987239872398237892379287239872398237982367 bad things just in the time it took you to read this post.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

25 Mar 2018, 7:10 am

goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Because he did 1 or 2 bad things. Trump is a vile human being 24/7 and has done 98723987239872398237892379287239872398237982367 bad things just in the time it took you to read this post.


We were only talking about one thing.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

25 Mar 2018, 1:18 pm

EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Because he did 1 or 2 bad things. Trump is a vile human being 24/7 and has done 98723987239872398237892379287239872398237982367 bad things just in the time it took you to read this post.


We were only talking about one thing.


Yeah, Bill vs. Don. I explained the difference.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

26 Mar 2018, 12:58 am

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Bill's past the statute of limitations for whatever he did in the distant past and if not then I would welcome an enquiry
Trump's indiscretions are within a time period that enables him to be prosecuted and it makes matters much worse that he's also the current POTUS...unless you are saying he deserves a free hall pass??



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

26 Mar 2018, 1:10 am

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Bill's past the statute of limitations for whatever he did in the distant past and if not then I would welcome an enquiry
Trump's indiscretions are within a time period that enables him to be prosecuted and it makes matters much worse that he's also the current POTUS...unless you are saying he deserves a free hall pass??


So 2006 is recent? Trump having a consensual quickly 12 years ago as a private citizen enables him to be prosecuted? For what. And I'd be interested in seeing this statute of limitations you're talking about. Or are you just making up legal interpretation the way you make up biblical interpretation?

Even in the civilian world there's a big difference between a ceo having had sex with someone 10 years before he worked for the company, and a ceo having multiple sexual encounters with an employee in his office. The former wouldn't get him fired, the latter would.

Should the evangelicals give him a free pass? Yes because Jesus would have given him a free pass, like he did with the woman accused of committing adultery.



Last edited by EzraS on 26 Mar 2018, 1:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

26 Mar 2018, 1:18 am

EzraS wrote:
Should the evangelicals give him a free pass? Yes because Jesus would have given him a free pass, like he did with the woman accused of committing adultery.

let's see how things transpire. He does have some powerful backers or else he would have been shot from some book depository or impeached long ago...



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

26 Mar 2018, 1:20 am

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Bill's past the statute of limitations for whatever he did in the distant past and if not then I would welcome an enquiry
Trump's indiscretions are within a time period that enables him to be prosecuted and it makes matters much worse that he's also the current POTUS...unless you are saying he deserves a free hall pass??


I'm beginning to think EzraS defends the indefensible as as sort of desensitization thing in preparation for a career as a lawyer. Maybe he thinks that if he can stand by someone like Trump, despite how vile he is in every aspect of his life from business to pleasure, and how terribly he's treating the lower & working class Americans who voted for him, that he'll be able to successfully defend the most morally corrupt criminal client imaginable and not lose any sleep at night while he tries to get them off on technicalities despite their obvious OJ Simpson glove wearing guilt. That really would explain the way he jumps to Trump's defence as if he's not a pile of human garbage who deserves to be in jail.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

26 Mar 2018, 1:20 am

cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Should the evangelicals give him a free pass? Yes because Jesus would have given him a free pass, like he did with the woman accused of committing adultery.

let's see how things transpire. He does have some powerful backers or else he would have been shot from some book depository or impeached long ago...


You mean the Secret Service? And impeached for what?



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

26 Mar 2018, 1:26 am

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Should the evangelicals give him a free pass? Yes because Jesus would have given him a free pass, like he did with the woman accused of committing adultery.

let's see how things transpire. He does have some powerful backers or else he would have been shot from some book depository or impeached long ago...


You mean the Secret Service? And impeached for what?


The most likely contender remains being "obstruction of justice," for firing Comey in an attempt to thwart the Russian investigation, but I'm sure there are multiple possibilities.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

26 Mar 2018, 1:32 am

goldfish21 wrote:
I'm beginning to think EzraS defends the indefensible as as sort of desensitization thing in preparation for a career as a lawyer. Maybe he thinks that if he can stand by someone like Trump, despite how vile he is in every aspect of his life from business to pleasure, and how terribly he's treating the lower & working class Americans who voted for him, that he'll be able to successfully defend the most morally corrupt criminal client imaginable and not lose any sleep at night while he tries to get them off on technicalities despite their obvious OJ Simpson glove wearing guilt. That really would explain the way he jumps to Trump's defence as if he's not a pile of human garbage who deserves to be in jail.


I think he mentioned connections with bikies in Arizona (perhaps his dad?), in any case Arizona is the only state in the US to object to MLK day plus a crowd at Indian Welles famously threw racist slurs at the Williams sisters. Might be the local culture there...? dunno...



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

26 Mar 2018, 1:50 am

goldfish21 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Bill's past the statute of limitations for whatever he did in the distant past and if not then I would welcome an enquiry
Trump's indiscretions are within a time period that enables him to be prosecuted and it makes matters much worse that he's also the current POTUS...unless you are saying he deserves a free hall pass??


I'm beginning to think EzraS defends the indefensible as as sort of desensitization thing in preparation for a career as a lawyer. Maybe he thinks that if he can stand by someone like Trump, despite how vile he is in every aspect of his life from business to pleasure, and how terribly he's treating the lower & working class Americans who voted for him, that he'll be able to successfully defend the most morally corrupt criminal client imaginable and not lose any sleep at night while he tries to get them off on technicalities despite their obvious OJ Simpson glove wearing guilt. That really would explain the way he jumps to Trump's defence as if he's not a pile of human garbage who deserves to be in jail.


I'm just not an over exaggerating over emotional drama queen.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

26 Mar 2018, 1:54 am

60 min interview will soon reveal Stormy Daniel's was confronted by a man threatening to kill her in front of her daughter if she went public about Trump

Daniels said she was threatened by a man in Las Vegas while in a car park with her baby daughter.

She said she had been on her way to a fitness class with her child when an unknown man approached her.

"And a guy walked up on me and said to me, 'Leave Trump alone. Forget the story'," she said.

"And then he leaned around and looked at my daughter and said, 'That's a beautiful little girl. It'd be a shame if something happened to her mum.' And then he was gone."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-26/s ... ir/9586410



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

26 Mar 2018, 1:58 am

EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Bill's past the statute of limitations for whatever he did in the distant past and if not then I would welcome an enquiry
Trump's indiscretions are within a time period that enables him to be prosecuted and it makes matters much worse that he's also the current POTUS...unless you are saying he deserves a free hall pass??


I'm beginning to think EzraS defends the indefensible as as sort of desensitization thing in preparation for a career as a lawyer. Maybe he thinks that if he can stand by someone like Trump, despite how vile he is in every aspect of his life from business to pleasure, and how terribly he's treating the lower & working class Americans who voted for him, that he'll be able to successfully defend the most morally corrupt criminal client imaginable and not lose any sleep at night while he tries to get them off on technicalities despite their obvious OJ Simpson glove wearing guilt. That really would explain the way he jumps to Trump's defence as if he's not a pile of human garbage who deserves to be in jail.


I'm just not an over exaggerating over emotional drama queen.


No, it's beyond that. You act as if his daily scandals aren't scandalous at all and as if the things he says and does are expected & acceptable of a President. Perhaps you're suffering from scandal fatigue.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

26 Mar 2018, 2:01 am

cyberdad wrote:
60 min interview will soon reveal Stormy Daniel's was confronted by a man threatening to kill her in front of her daughter if she went public about Trump

Daniels said she was threatened by a man in Las Vegas while in a car park with her baby daughter.

She said she had been on her way to a fitness class with her child when an unknown man approached her.

"And a guy walked up on me and said to me, 'Leave Trump alone. Forget the story'," she said.

"And then he leaned around and looked at my daughter and said, 'That's a beautiful little girl. It'd be a shame if something happened to her mum.' And then he was gone."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-26/s ... ir/9586410


I just posted the interview. There's no way to know if the man acted on his own or not.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

26 Mar 2018, 2:20 am

goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Funny how you gloss over Bill while expressing moral outrage over Don, while complaining about others doing the opposit.


Bill isn't POTUS


You gloss over what he did as potus.


Bill's past the statute of limitations for whatever he did in the distant past and if not then I would welcome an enquiry
Trump's indiscretions are within a time period that enables him to be prosecuted and it makes matters much worse that he's also the current POTUS...unless you are saying he deserves a free hall pass??


I'm beginning to think EzraS defends the indefensible as as sort of desensitization thing in preparation for a career as a lawyer. Maybe he thinks that if he can stand by someone like Trump, despite how vile he is in every aspect of his life from business to pleasure, and how terribly he's treating the lower & working class Americans who voted for him, that he'll be able to successfully defend the most morally corrupt criminal client imaginable and not lose any sleep at night while he tries to get them off on technicalities despite their obvious OJ Simpson glove wearing guilt. That really would explain the way he jumps to Trump's defence as if he's not a pile of human garbage who deserves to be in jail.


I'm just not an over exaggerating over emotional drama queen.


No, it's beyond that. You act as if his daily scandals aren't scandalous at all and as if the things he says and does are expected & acceptable of a President. Perhaps you're suffering from scandal fatigue.


I don't know about his so-called daily scandals because I don't read tabloid style news. Seems more like you're the one who needs a vacation from all that.