danlo wrote:
SuXEed, Jason, they only convicted him of statutory rape because of her age. He didn't actually rape her, as it was consensual. Personally, I think it's pretty bloody stupid, because it was consensual, and they were actually BOTH underage. By the same reasoning, as they were both underage, surely she could be convicted of raping him also, because legally he is considered too young to make an informed decision on the matter. It's an insane application of the law.
So even if he was only 1 month older than her, presumably he still would have been charged with statutory rape, regardless of their ages being close and it being consensual. I agree, it is ridiculous.
A far more appropriate response would be give both of these kids some sex education (teaching proper safe/responsible practices etc), as well as any psychological and counselling support that may be needed (if any).