Page 3 of 5 [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Leekduck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 620
Location: Britain

01 Aug 2010, 4:23 pm

oh and just now im enjoying a nice big cup of fresh cool semi-skimmed milk, the dairy type

mmmmm I can feel the autism flowing right through me, Im getting more autistic by the second



danandlouie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 796
Location: rainbow bridge

01 Aug 2010, 4:40 pm

mr. littledick......oh, sorry leekduck you're 17 and have been dealing with what--hippy styled terrorists all your life. oh man-have i now entered a comedy site. just too funny. i've been to kenya tanzania ethiopia sudan central african republic rwanda and in north africa, egypt libya morocco. gave away everything i had with me each time. what have you done, sonny? come on now, get mad, throw your computer against the wall. i know you can do it



Celoneth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 526

01 Aug 2010, 4:41 pm

PETA stinks. I am very much for animal rights and I don't eat meat and I can't stand them. They have absolutely no morals or ethics and don't do the animal rights movement any favours because any animal rights cause immediately gets thrown in with PETA.
-They have several campaigns that are very sexist and demean women
-They are moralising and obnoxious - if you're not vegan, they basically paint you as scum - which causes a backlash against the entire animal rights community and is the reason behind the "People Eating Tasty Animals" types.
-They aren't afraid of using pseudoscience and exaggeration to sell their cause - like the "milk causes autism" crap.
-They complain about stupid crap like Obama squishing a bug, and making anyone who isn't 100% vegan into some kind of kitten-eating Hitler zombie, which makes no one take them seriously when they bring up real issues of animal suffering.
There are plenty of good animal rights groups, shelters, no-kill shelters and vegetarian groups, that do their best to help animals without being rude, moralising and dishonest - those deserve respect, PETA deserves none.



Leekduck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 620
Location: Britain

01 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm

danandlouie wrote:
mr. littledick......oh, sorry leekduck you're 17 and have been dealing with what--hippy styled terrorists all your life. oh man-have i now entered a comedy site. just too funny. i've been to kenya tanzania ethiopia sudan central african republic rwanda and in north africa, egypt libya morocco. gave away everything i had with me each time. what have you done, sonny? come on now, get mad, throw your computer against the wall. i know you can do it


Lol, U mad? Peta is a joke so expect jokes back



Leekduck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 620
Location: Britain

01 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm

also i know your lieng 'Mr. Littledick' you must be 12 XD



Suiseiten
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 118

01 Aug 2010, 5:56 pm

right-hand-child wrote:
that said, i sincerely hope they've been watching these last few posts. probably planning on making some horrible attempt to sue us :lol:
I'd love to see them try. Fortunately, I have a bit of a sanctuary with where I live from PETA. Wyoming is such a wonderful place in this aspect. Most everyone hunts and I have yet to be hounded anywhere in town over my meal choices.

Oh, and the scare tactics is yet another reason I am against them. I'd first help the ASPCA or Humane Society because they're not trying to choke us with their fear mongering.



right-hand-child
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 221

02 Aug 2010, 5:53 am

danandlouie wrote:
been listening to 'people eating tasty animals' types for years. like i said, such hatred toward trying to help animals. have any of you seen a film of a dog being skinned while still alive and left to die a slow death? no, and you never will. "oooh, don't show me that" 5,000,000 animals killed in usa animal shelters each year. roughly 60% of all animals left at shelters. lots of people that peta hires are like you guys, couldn't care less about the non-human animals. it's a big group, and most resources go to fighting factory farms and fur industries, little money for background checks for hires 2000 miles from headquarters. those found skirting rules are fired quickly. gandhi was a man who thought all animals should be treated humanely.....think i'll go with his choices. the louie in the my name is a mixed breed dog who was used as a bait dog. that's a dog that animal fighters use to tease the fighting pit bulls. he was bitten over most of his head, one eye ripped, a shredded ear.............he now lives a comfortable life, healed and loved. i will protect him to the death. peta helps thousands of dogs like louie, even if it's to put them down to put them out of your misery. maybe this is a michael vick support group i've stumbled into. most postings sound like the things i've heard from dogfighters........

clearly you didnt read my post, so i'll spell it out it to you:

-i already know what kind of s*** happens to animals.
-i support animal rights
-i just dont like PETA's methods
-PETA is not the only animal rights group

clearly you plan to keep ignoring the point. i honestly cant stand people like you, you just cant argue with them because you can never have anything that meets the standards of 'conversation' with them. its just them talking to you, you could be saying any old crap and they'd say the same thing because they just DONT LISTEN.

spout whatever paranoid BS you want, i've done NOTHING wrong.


_________________
I can't think of something witty to say, but if I could, I'd probably put it here.


Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

02 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm

NEWS JUST IN: PETA CHANGES NAME TO ANIMALS SPEAK :roll:

But yeah, I always knew those guys were dodgy.



Suiseiten
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 118

02 Aug 2010, 12:25 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
NEWS JUST IN: PETA CHANGES NAME TO ANIMALS SPEAK :roll:

But yeah, I always knew those guys were dodgy.
XD In related news, they have replaced Ingrid with a Jenny McCarthy lookalike.



Lene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,452
Location: East China Sea

02 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm

I don't get the big deal.

The poster is a bit stupid. I suppose it's no worse than PETA though in using 'shock' to deliver a message, rather than facts.

Where are the citations for PETA only using '1%' of its funds on animals? That's seems quite low, although bearing in mind that it's an animal rights awareness charity, not a shelter, it would make sense that a high proportion of funds goes on adverts.

I find the PETA campaigns hit and miss. Some are good, but there's enough stupid ones to do some serious damage to the organisation, and they don't do much to highlight what they have achieved (if anything).

As for the actress being called a hypocrite for driving a car with leather seats... firstly, leather is a byproduct of the dairy and meat industry, but more importantly, where on earth do you find cars with non-leather interiors? Seriously, I'd like to know!



PunkyKat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,492
Location: Kalahari Desert

02 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm

If I wasn't such an easy target, I'd like to join ALF, I'd make all the other members look like saints and boyscouts since I have such a pathological hate of people.


_________________
I'm not weird, you're just too normal.


danandlouie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 796
Location: rainbow bridge

02 Aug 2010, 11:58 pm

right on punkycat. unfortunately, the fbi has wiped out alf, labeled them a domestic terrorist group and long prison sentences await anyone going to the wall to help the most tortured animals.

all you can do, really, is to act locally. maybe you can't put up with the humans you'll meet, but you can try. believe me, the reward of knowing you've helped a non-human animal is worth it. how about a ferret rescue group-they're america's answer to the meercat. the 'peta (ida, fs, lca, etc.) sucks' that you read here, it's just as bad in the real world. tis a shame. keep in your mind what ghandi said about animals.



right-hand-child
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 221

03 Aug 2010, 5:23 am

Lene wrote:
I don't get the big deal.

The poster is a bit stupid. I suppose it's no worse than PETA though in using 'shock' to deliver a message, rather than facts.

Where are the citations for PETA only using '1%' of its funds on animals? That's seems quite low, although bearing in mind that it's an animal rights awareness charity, not a shelter, it would make sense that a high proportion of funds goes on adverts.

I find the PETA campaigns hit and miss. Some are good, but there's enough stupid ones to do some serious damage to the organisation, and they don't do much to highlight what they have achieved (if anything).

As for the actress being called a hypocrite for driving a car with leather seats... firstly, leather is a byproduct of the dairy and meat industry, but more importantly, where on earth do you find cars with non-leather interiors? Seriously, I'd like to know!

if i'd known it would turn into such a big deal, i wouldnt have posted it. for the third time now, it wasnt meant to be taken seriously.


_________________
I can't think of something witty to say, but if I could, I'd probably put it here.


Leekduck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 620
Location: Britain

03 Aug 2010, 9:18 am

danandlouie wrote:
right on punkycat. unfortunately, the fbi has wiped out alf, labeled them a domestic terrorist group and long prison sentences await anyone going to the wall to help the most tortured animals.

all you can do, really, is to act locally. maybe you can't put up with the humans you'll meet, but you can try. believe me, the reward of knowing you've helped a non-human animal is worth it. how about a ferret rescue group-they're america's answer to the meercat. the 'peta (ida, fs, lca, etc.) sucks' that you read here, it's just as bad in the real world. tis a shame. keep in your mind what ghandi said about animals.



Alf Firebombs people, they are like a pathetic version of the IRA :x



Suiseiten
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 118

03 Aug 2010, 11:12 am

right-hand-child wrote:
Lene wrote:
I don't get the big deal.

The poster is a bit stupid. I suppose it's no worse than PETA though in using 'shock' to deliver a message, rather than facts.

Where are the citations for PETA only using '1%' of its funds on animals? That's seems quite low, although bearing in mind that it's an animal rights awareness charity, not a shelter, it would make sense that a high proportion of funds goes on adverts.

I find the PETA campaigns hit and miss. Some are good, but there's enough stupid ones to do some serious damage to the organisation, and they don't do much to highlight what they have achieved (if anything).

As for the actress being called a hypocrite for driving a car with leather seats... firstly, leather is a byproduct of the dairy and meat industry, but more importantly, where on earth do you find cars with non-leather interiors? Seriously, I'd like to know!

if i'd known it would turn into such a big deal, i wouldnt have posted it. for the third time now, it wasnt meant to be taken seriously.
It's not your fault. It was a good piece of satire, but when you title the thread, "PETA just sucks," it's almost an invitation for people who can spot the truth behind the joke, the people who flat out agree that they suck, and of course those who buy into PETA themselves, be it partially or wholeheartedly. No matter what either group says, they'll never meet eye to eye and it will cause a debate. I'm sorry that I went as far as I did, but I am very stubborn when people tell me that I don't research anything or that I don't know what I'm talking about. Probably a little more than I should be online.



right-hand-child
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 221

03 Aug 2010, 12:11 pm

Suiseiten wrote:
right-hand-child wrote:
Lene wrote:
I don't get the big deal.

The poster is a bit stupid. I suppose it's no worse than PETA though in using 'shock' to deliver a message, rather than facts.

Where are the citations for PETA only using '1%' of its funds on animals? That's seems quite low, although bearing in mind that it's an animal rights awareness charity, not a shelter, it would make sense that a high proportion of funds goes on adverts.

I find the PETA campaigns hit and miss. Some are good, but there's enough stupid ones to do some serious damage to the organisation, and they don't do much to highlight what they have achieved (if anything).

As for the actress being called a hypocrite for driving a car with leather seats... firstly, leather is a byproduct of the dairy and meat industry, but more importantly, where on earth do you find cars with non-leather interiors? Seriously, I'd like to know!

if i'd known it would turn into such a big deal, i wouldnt have posted it. for the third time now, it wasnt meant to be taken seriously.
It's not your fault. It was a good piece of satire, but when you title the thread, "PETA just sucks," it's almost an invitation for people who can spot the truth behind the joke, the people who flat out agree that they suck, and of course those who buy into PETA themselves, be it partially or wholeheartedly. No matter what either group says, they'll never meet eye to eye and it will cause a debate. I'm sorry that I went as far as I did, but I am very stubborn when people tell me that I don't research anything or that I don't know what I'm talking about. Probably a little more than I should be online.

...true but i didnt feel like calling it "funny, just for humor PETA pic". i probably could have thought up something more apropriate though. still, people would probably still take it seriously.


_________________
I can't think of something witty to say, but if I could, I'd probably put it here.