Page 3 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Seanmw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,639
Location: Bremerton, WA

18 Jun 2010, 7:23 pm

wow, that's ridiculousss :lol: :lol: :lol:


_________________
+Blog: http://itsdeeperthanyouknow.blogspot.com/
+"Beneath all chaos lies perfect order"


Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

18 Jun 2010, 7:54 pm

Tequila wrote:
There are a lot of, well, normal people (for want of a better word) in Australia who think this stinks too.


I assumed so.



jaspie
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 182

19 Jun 2010, 4:50 am

If I have a girlfriend,and her breast size is less than 32C,I'll have to say that she needs to be at 36D to be assured that I am not a paedophile.
I have heard some sad political policies but this one is f'ing distressing.



Amajanshi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 626

20 Jun 2010, 3:59 pm

The ban is ridiculous, the legality of porn should be by AGE of the people involved and not by physical appearance!! ! I'm sure there are plenty of women who happen to be A cup...



Invincible
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 105
Location: Brooklyn, NY

21 Jun 2010, 9:54 am

sartresue wrote:
There's a sucker porn every minute topic

They assume only underage girls are exploited. Boys under the age of 16 are also at risk.

A poor solution. Better vigilance by police and concerned citizens for all types of degrading imagry of children are what is needed.

A better solution would be to have the parents take responsibility and actually talk to their kids. The kids who dress sensibly are just as likely to be exploited as a kids that dress provocatively.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,420
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

21 Jun 2010, 11:04 am

That's just plain stupid. I'm glad that I don't live there.


_________________
The Family Enigma


ProfessorX
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2007
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,795

21 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm

A ban on small-breasted women sounds so outlandish and absurd that, one wonders what sort of message is the government of Australia trying to pass of..Honestly, I find this completely nonsensible and dumb more or less.. What is this world coming to when everyone has to fit some sort of physical or mental standard in life? A weird one at that..
:roll:

:roll:



Pandoran-March
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 103

21 Jun 2010, 4:55 pm

ProfessorX wrote:
A ban on small-breasted women sounds so outlandish and absurd that, one wonders what sort of message is the government of Australia trying to pass of..Honestly, I find this completely nonsensible and dumb more or less.. What is this world coming to when everyone has to fit some sort of physical or mental standard in life? A weird one at that..
:roll:

What this is going to do is attack the self esteem of every Aussie woman with small breasts. Apparently women didn't have enough to hate themselves for in Australia.

Wouldn't a better solution be to go after all the schoolgirl porn? I'm sure there's a dozen things Aussies could attack in place of small breasts, most of them without cutting down people's self-esteem.


_________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
~ Albert Einstein


ProfessorX
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2007
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,795

21 Jun 2010, 7:48 pm

The idea of enforcing some sort of ban on small-breasted women is completey lunacy..Actually, I'd think it will have a great negative impact on many young women whom are not plastic surgery enhanced as the above poster stated it will have detrimental effects on young women's self esteem..Lastly, forgive me if I sounded irresponsible and immature in my previous post.. :oops: :oops: :(