Why schools being allowed to search kids for iPods is stupid
Asp-Z wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Some more reasons: IPODS incorrectly used can damage hearing. Children are past masters at incorrectly using items. (which is why they took to supervising the kids using the band-saw more)
How can they damage your hearing? iPods actually can't, by law, go above a certain volume level for that very reason, and I'm sure other kids and/or the teacher would get annoyed with the music being audible outside of the headphones long before it even gets to that level.
Quote:
In a school environment, IPODS etc can and do become fashion accessories and status symbols. (Your phone is crap. Mine is better. Now I will bully you. You only have a generic mp3 but I have an IPOD, therefore your parents are poor. Now I shall bully you. Your music is sh**, you listen to gay songs. Now I will bully you.)
I dunno. This used to be true, but these days everyone has iPods really, and people with other brands of MP3 players usually attract interest if nothing else, because it's a different thing others probably haven't seen before.
People do make comments about each other's music, and they can be both positive and negative, but I what I noticed in my school was that there were different groups of kids who seemed to have matching music tastes, or at least music tastes out of the norm, and those people actually made fun of those who liked the popular stuff, so it depends who you hang out with.
I don't think, however, any of this stuff alone will cause actual bullying. If it does, then the bully in question would have found another excuse to do it anyway.
Quote:
IPODS etc are not cheap. They are expensive electrical items that are easily lost/damaged/stolen. If I buy my son a £180 electrical item and he loses it, he's in the sh**. If someone steals it from him, THEY are in the sh**. A lot of schools do not wish to get dragged into the inevitable arguments and blame-throwing so they don't want the opportunity to occur.
You can get an iPod shuffle for just over £30, I'd say that's fairly cheap. If price concerns you, try eBay as well.
At my school, pretty much everyone in my year brought their phones in. Many were BlackBerries, which can be sold for about £200-£400 (depending on the model). But it was still very rare that they got stolen. I think, in the 4 years I was there, two or three phones were stolen in the school, that's it. And they were usually found again by the staff. And this is in London as well - a city where theft on the streets is stupidly high.
Quote:
If a school retains the policy of: you shouldn't have brought it to school, then many children will get the wrong impression from this when their expensive item is stolen/destroyed and the culprits are not punished for theft/destruction. They will only learn that they can do what they like to other peoples property so long as it WASN'T SUPPOSED TO BE THERE.
That's BS. So, what, if something's not meant to be there, that's justification for stealing it? And if it's true that something which isn't meant to be there will get kids thinking it's OK to steal it (which it isn't), then surely the solution is to allow them?
Quote:
IPODS can be a lethal distraction when travelling. People who are given to ignoring the correct instructions on how to safely use an item will likely get hurt. See earlier comment about children using things incorrectly.
I don't get exactly what it is you're talking about here. Are you talking about someone not listening to directions because of the iPod? Because you don't do a whole lot of traveling at school except getting to and from the place, and it's safe to assume the child can remember their own way home if they do it everyday.
And how the hell can incorrectly using an iPod hurt me? Will pressing the wrong button release the flame thrower?
Quote:
Modern smartphones can not only be used to cheat, they are a useful tool in cyber-bullying, and such phones increase the likelihood of real-time cyber-bullying that is very hard to detect.
No it isn't. Cyber-bullying is done over the internet, and it's easy to track who did what on the internet. And not bringing the smartphone to school wouldn't stop the cyber-bullying anyway.
In fact, if anything, someone in your own school cyber-bullying you is better than normal bullying, because you have evidence on your phone of it happening - records of exactly what the bully has said to you, attached to a phone number or IP address which can be traced right back to the bastard.
Quote:
If children will continuously play bloody awful ringtones and songs on sh***y bass-less phones in public then they will definitely do it in lessons and other places designed to disrupt and annoy.
They won't do that because the teachers would stop them. Headphones exist for a reason.
Quote:
Maybe, if there were a determined effort to teach children manners and etiquette (or in general) in the use of such tools then such problems would not occur. That I have no issue with. The fact that "blocking out surrounding distractions" (a concept I am well familiar with) helps concentration could be as easily brought about by earplugs or possibly enforcing a better behaved classroom, or even communal music.
It's not just about blocking things out, music has an effect on our brains which improves concentration, see the study I linked to a few posts ago.
Last first: Still not buying that your study of music helping concentration is any more accurate than the opposing study.
Children (and adults) DO play bloody annoying bass-less crap everywhere you go, and they DO do it in classes, and the fact that a teacher has to stop them doing it IS a disruption to the class...Just like the teachers used to stop people doing spitballs and have to spend two out of five minutes doing it every ten.
You have an odd idea of what is "easy" to track on the internet, which gives me the impression that you're the kind of person who wholeheartedly believes his PC is totally secure when it isn't.
Incorrect use of an IPOD...Plenty of people have walked into traffic, trains and trams by paying more attention to their music player than their surroundings. Thus, incorrectly used, they can be dangerous. Children are very good at using things incorrectly. Is that any clearer? Its a variation on "playing with the radio" whilst driving.
Schools DO justify their own lack of concern over property destruction with "it wasn't supposed to be on school property" all the time.
And everyone does not "have an ipod, really." Try looking outside your limited circle.Also, I'm using IPOD in a generic sense here as well, and just because IPODs theoretically can't go loud enough to damage hearing, doesn't mean others can't. (And yes, I own an IPOD and I'm intimately familiar with what it can and can't do. Before that I owned generic MP3s, and before that a CD walkman, and before that a cassette walkman, and all the same problems applied. The only thing that changed was the size. Its easier to hide an IPOD.)
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
Macbeth wrote:
Last first: Still not buying that your study of music helping concentration is any more accurate than the opposing study.
Fine, but I'm sure you know people who've said from their personal experience that music helps then concentrate, right? I know loads. Oh, and you have yet to show me any of these mythical opposing studies.
Quote:
Children (and adults) DO play bloody annoying bass-less crap everywhere you go, and they DO do it in classes, and the fact that a teacher has to stop them doing it IS a disruption to the class...Just like the teachers used to stop people doing spitballs and have to spend two out of five minutes doing it every ten.
Yeah, those spitballs are also a problem, so I guess the answer is to ban paper from schools.
Quote:
You have an odd idea of what is "easy" to track on the internet, which gives me the impression that you're the kind of person who wholeheartedly believes his PC is totally secure when it isn't.
When did I say my PC was totally secure? Where does my PC even come into this? I know that absolutely nothing is completely secure, so why are you fooling yourself that it is?
Quote:
Incorrect use of an IPOD...Plenty of people have walked into traffic, trains and trams by paying more attention to their music player than their surroundings. Thus, incorrectly used, they can be dangerous. Children are very good at using things incorrectly. Is that any clearer? Its a variation on "playing with the radio" whilst driving.
The same can happen while you read a newspaper, so let's ban those too. And crossing roads has nothing to do with it anyway, we're talking about in school.
Quote:
Schools DO justify their own lack of concern over property destruction with "it wasn't supposed to be on school property" all the time.
Oh, that's what you meant. Well, they could just as easily tell people they can bring things in at their own risk, loads of places do that. Hell, they could even make the parents sign disclaimers, there'd be no arguments then.
Quote:
And everyone does not "have an ipod, really." Try looking outside your limited circle.Also, I'm using IPOD in a generic sense here as well, and just because IPODs theoretically can't go loud enough to damage hearing, doesn't mean others can't. (And yes, I own an IPOD and I'm intimately familiar with what it can and can't do. Before that I owned generic MP3s, and before that a CD walkman, and before that a cassette walkman, and all the same problems applied. The only thing that changed was the size. Its easier to hide an IPOD.)
Well if you're concerned about what MP3 players can do, write to the companies that make them. I don't see how that factors into the school thing specifically though.
And do you know anyone who dosen't have any sort of music player at all?
Asp-Z wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Last first: Still not buying that your study of music helping concentration is any more accurate than the opposing study.
Fine, but I'm sure you know people who've said from their personal experience that music helps then concentrate, right? I know loads. Oh, and you have yet to show me any of these mythical opposing studies.
Quote:
Children (and adults) DO play bloody annoying bass-less crap everywhere you go, and they DO do it in classes, and the fact that a teacher has to stop them doing it IS a disruption to the class...Just like the teachers used to stop people doing spitballs and have to spend two out of five minutes doing it every ten.
Yeah, those spitballs are also a problem, so I guess the answer is to ban paper from schools.
Quote:
You have an odd idea of what is "easy" to track on the internet, which gives me the impression that you're the kind of person who wholeheartedly believes his PC is totally secure when it isn't.
When did I say my PC was totally secure? Where does my PC even come into this? I know that absolutely nothing is completely secure, so why are you fooling yourself that it is?
Quote:
Incorrect use of an IPOD...Plenty of people have walked into traffic, trains and trams by paying more attention to their music player than their surroundings. Thus, incorrectly used, they can be dangerous. Children are very good at using things incorrectly. Is that any clearer? Its a variation on "playing with the radio" whilst driving.
The same can happen while you read a newspaper, so let's ban those too. And crossing roads has nothing to do with it anyway, we're talking about in school.
Quote:
Schools DO justify their own lack of concern over property destruction with "it wasn't supposed to be on school property" all the time.
Oh, that's what you meant. Well, they could just as easily tell people they can bring things in at their own risk, loads of places do that. Hell, they could even make the parents sign disclaimers, there'd be no arguments then.
Quote:
And everyone does not "have an ipod, really." Try looking outside your limited circle.Also, I'm using IPOD in a generic sense here as well, and just because IPODs theoretically can't go loud enough to damage hearing, doesn't mean others can't. (And yes, I own an IPOD and I'm intimately familiar with what it can and can't do. Before that I owned generic MP3s, and before that a CD walkman, and before that a cassette walkman, and all the same problems applied. The only thing that changed was the size. Its easier to hide an IPOD.)
Well if you're concerned about what MP3 players can do, write to the companies that make them. I don't see how that factors into the school thing specifically though.
And do you know anyone who dosen't have any sort of music player at all?
You appear to have an issue with reductio absurdum. Did I say "ban paper because spitballs are disruptive"? No. I merely pointed out that disruptive behaviour BY DEFINITION disrupts a class. Likewise things which use concentration will take up concentration. I never said ban newspapers (I didn't even say ban IPODS per se) or anything of the sort. Your PC security position is suggested by your attitude towards what is or is not possible as far as smartphones and cyber-bullying are concerned. Why did you get the idea that I think such things are possible when I'm saying exactly the opposite? Maybe you should take your IPOD off and pay attention
You miss the part where I said I own one? Wanting PROPER USE is not the same as BAN IT NOW. Guns, knives, IPODS, phones, newspapers and spitballs: they all have a proper use and their proper place and its not in school (barring the obvious exceptions like cutting up food.)
Crossing roads is merely an example of a place where having your concentration disrupted can be dangerous. In any situation, vital instructions can be missed, vital things not noticed. Also, many schools consider that whilst you are in uniform you come under their aegis and what you do/what happens to you reflects on the school. And again, missing the point I was making there. PROPER USE.
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/ ... key=118464
There's your study. Not to mention that getting the attention of a class when they're all stuck in to their IPODS would be a pain in the ass.
Try thinking outside your own desire to have an IPOD in class and consider what other problems there might be.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
This isn't half as stupid as when I was in Elementary School and the teachers used to actually take pokemon cards from kids and the principle would tear them up in front of the students.
I was never into Pokemon, but damn! What gives them the right to tear up something the parents paid good money for? ![]()
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Why aren’t I allowed to date anyone other than my boyfriend? |
Yesterday, 12:44 pm |
| Privacy improvements are coming to Google Search services |
02 Jul 2026, 7:49 pm |
| Forcing myself to have kids but I can't stand tantrums |
15 Jul 2026, 11:37 am |
