Page 3 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

03 Oct 2011, 4:06 pm

Fnord wrote:
a. There is a distinct absence of evidence that blue light is harmful to humans.

b. Absence of evidence, while not evidence of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.

: : There exists sufficient cause for reasonable doubt that blue light is harmful to humans.

Blue light yes, but not a BLUE LASER.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,682
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 Oct 2011, 4:29 pm

Gedrene wrote:
Fnord wrote:
a. There is a distinct absence of evidence that blue light is harmful to humans.

b. Absence of evidence, while not evidence of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.

: : There exists sufficient cause for reasonable doubt that blue light is harmful to humans.

Blue light yes, but not a BLUE LASER.

Well, the blue laser is there so you don't have to go at their melon with a scalpel to get the blue light in.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


oldmantime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 522

03 Oct 2011, 6:31 pm

I don't know whether this mess is legit or not, but I do have to ask, why do you people bother making all these idiotic posts? They contribute nothing and are a waste of space.

Also, one should post a link when making a thread like this.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

03 Oct 2011, 6:37 pm

^ Agreed.

Imo, posting an unattributed and partial quote to assert a claim is only slightly less offensive than posting a false claim and declaring it true.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


N0tYetDeadFred
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 243
Location: Fortress of Solitude

03 Oct 2011, 7:15 pm

I think the guy in the Bible who was lying by the pool wasn't really paralyzed. I just think he wouldn't get up and get in the pool because he had bad social skills. Then Jesus cured him...with a blue laser, perhaps?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

03 Oct 2011, 7:23 pm

N0tYetDeadFred wrote:
I think the guy in the Bible who was lying by the pool wasn't really paralyzed. I just think he wouldn't get up and get in the pool because he had bad social skills. Then Jesus cured him...with a blue laser, perhaps?

:wall:


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

03 Oct 2011, 11:04 pm

:lol:



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

04 Oct 2011, 1:47 am

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Fnord wrote:
a. There is a distinct absence of evidence that blue light is harmful to humans.

b. Absence of evidence, while not evidence of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.

: : There exists sufficient cause for reasonable doubt that blue light is harmful to humans.

Blue light yes, but not a BLUE LASER.

Well, the blue laser is there so you don't have to go at their melon with a scalpel to get the blue light in.

Blue lasers are dangerous? Do I really need to go over this again? No shooting a blue laser at someone is going to help with autism.