Greek austerity plan includes tax cut for the rich
Inuyasha wrote:
I came across something rather interesting:
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet
If you look at the tables that can be generated, you'd see that unemployment started going up big time in 2008, it also should be noted that it was during the time that we had a Democrat controlled congress (they got control in January of 2007).
Also if you look at the numbers the highest Bush unemployment number was 7.3%
In August of 2008 we had 6.1% unemployment, 8.1% unemployment August of 2012 (and that's not counting miilions of Americans that have given up).
From 2004-2007, unemploymnt was below 6%.
Looks like Bush and the Republicans had the better policy. The reason our economy is still struggling is because Obama is trying to be more like Greece.
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet
If you look at the tables that can be generated, you'd see that unemployment started going up big time in 2008, it also should be noted that it was during the time that we had a Democrat controlled congress (they got control in January of 2007).
Also if you look at the numbers the highest Bush unemployment number was 7.3%
In August of 2008 we had 6.1% unemployment, 8.1% unemployment August of 2012 (and that's not counting miilions of Americans that have given up).
From 2004-2007, unemploymnt was below 6%.
Looks like Bush and the Republicans had the better policy. The reason our economy is still struggling is because Obama is trying to be more like Greece.
Maybe this will blow your mind...
Last edited by marshall on 06 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Inuyasha wrote:
Tensu wrote:
I'm normally not one to indulge in on-topic nazism, but it seems like, and no offence intended, you turn every discussion of foreign (To us Americans) politics into some sort of attack on Obama.
You don't like Obama. I can understand that. Why don't you start a thread about it in PPR instead of hijacking every other thread in N&CE.
You don't like Obama. I can understand that. Why don't you start a thread about it in PPR instead of hijacking every other thread in N&CE.
The policies that people are preaching for (the same ones that got Greece into their mess) are the same ones that Obama is pushing for in my country.
The reason why tax hikes will not work for Greece is quite simple, the size of a country's economy is not a constant. When you hike taxes, (particularly in the case of a country like Greece (and any other country in an economic slump) you end up shrinking the overall size of the economy and thus you end up with the same revenue in a best case scenario, but more often you end up with a shrinking revenue for the government.
The problem with the argument that hiking taxes creates unemployment or reduces GDP, or any other right wing talking point, is that it is demonstrably untrue. There are countries where the government has a controlling share in their GDP, like Germany or Sweden. Yet Germany and Sweden seem to be doing just fine economically. Historically, during the 50s, 60s, and 70s, the US had a higher tax burden on its wealthy citizens than it does now. Yet during that time we experienced tremendous economic growth. That was a time when you could feed a family and send your kids to school on one household income. Now, after 30 years of nearly uninterrupted right wing economic policy, an erosion of the middle class has occurred.
Conservatives act like governments just drop tax money on the sun, but that money stays in the economy. It provides services, utilities, it pays for scientific research, it pays for healthcare for senior citizens, it pays off the national debt.
Our taxes are lower right now than they've ever been since World War II. Yet despite getting these tax breaks for over a decade, the "job creators" that were the main beneficiaries sure are taking their merry damn time to create jobs. Last night, Romney mentioned something: that middle-class Americans have seen their incomes decrease by $4000 in the past four years. This is quite true.
What he neglected to mention was that middle-class Americans have seen their incomes shrink for the past ten years. This process had already begun long before Obama took office, and it has continued, largely due to Obama's center-right fiscal policies, which governor Romney mostly supports anyway.
GoonSquad
Veteran
Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...
Tequila wrote:
Vatnos wrote:
Yet Germany and Sweden seem to be doing just fine economically.
The Germans particularly tend to the pretty pissed off about the euro though. A lot of them aren't keen and want to jettison it.
Hmm... That makes no sense. From everything I've read, the euro is weaker than a revived mark would be. Right now, it's the weaker euro that's driving Germany's export business. The last thing they need is a properly valued (strong) currency.
_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus
GoonSquad wrote:
Tequila wrote:
Vatnos wrote:
Yet Germany and Sweden seem to be doing just fine economically.
The Germans particularly tend to the pretty pissed off about the euro though. A lot of them aren't keen and want to jettison it.
Hmm... That makes no sense. From everything I've read, the euro is weaker than a revived mark would be. Right now, it's the weaker euro that's driving Germany's export business. The last thing they need is a properly valued (strong) currency.
Germany is known for quality engineering though, people will spend the extra money for a German made car because of the added quality.
Inuyasha wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
Tequila wrote:
Vatnos wrote:
Yet Germany and Sweden seem to be doing just fine economically.
The Germans particularly tend to the pretty pissed off about the euro though. A lot of them aren't keen and want to jettison it.
Hmm... That makes no sense. From everything I've read, the euro is weaker than a revived mark would be. Right now, it's the weaker euro that's driving Germany's export business. The last thing they need is a properly valued (strong) currency.
Germany is known for quality engineering though, people will spend the extra money for a German made car because of the added quality.
Try telling that to those who supported the old "buy American" campaign.
Tensu wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
Tequila wrote:
Vatnos wrote:
Yet Germany and Sweden seem to be doing just fine economically.
The Germans particularly tend to the pretty pissed off about the euro though. A lot of them aren't keen and want to jettison it.
Hmm... That makes no sense. From everything I've read, the euro is weaker than a revived mark would be. Right now, it's the weaker euro that's driving Germany's export business. The last thing they need is a properly valued (strong) currency.
Germany is known for quality engineering though, people will spend the extra money for a German made car because of the added quality.
Try telling that to those who supported the old "buy American" campaign.
If GM was making sound business decisions instead of trying to sell defective cars, they would be in a lot better shape. Heck, they may need another bailout.
Ford didn't take any money and they are in a lot better shape.
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Well, if you consider the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare to have been unconstitutional, perhaps you'll also then agree that their ruling that corporations are people is wrong.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Nope, however the decision of whether or not a corporation donates to a political campaign is the decision of the stockholders.
The real reason Democrats wanted to keep corporations from being able to donate to campaigns is because they didn't want all that Big Union money offset by some other group.
If a Union with their fat-cat slobs can be considered a person, than a corporation should be able to do the same.
No one ever said unions could be considered a person - and neither are corporations. And as a matter of fact, there has been an active effort to silence and break unions, taking away the voice of ordinary working men and women.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Well that's interesting cause all the campaign contribution laws the democrats tried to push through EXEMPTED UNIONs!! !
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Well, if you consider the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare to have been unconstitutional, perhaps you'll also then agree that their ruling that corporations are people is wrong.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Nope, however the decision of whether or not a corporation donates to a political campaign is the decision of the stockholders.
The real reason Democrats wanted to keep corporations from being able to donate to campaigns is because they didn't want all that Big Union money offset by some other group.
If a Union with their fat-cat slobs can be considered a person, than a corporation should be able to do the same.
No one ever said unions could be considered a person - and neither are corporations. And as a matter of fact, there has been an active effort to silence and break unions, taking away the voice of ordinary working men and women.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Well that's interesting cause all the campaign contribution laws the democrats tried to push through EXEMPTED UNIONs!! !
Well, here's an idea - why don't the Republicans stop being so anti-union, so they can get union contributions, too.
Incidentally, the Teamsters under Jimmy Hoffa in fact donated money to the Nixon campaign. Nixon got hooked up with Hoffa probably by mutual friends like Carlos Marcello, Johny Rosseli, and other organized figures Nixon worked with as Eisenhower's VP, when he was handling the CIA-Mafia plots to kill Castro for Ike.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
