Kurgan wrote:
Good riddance. Chavez didn't achieve anything in Venezuela--the oil bubble did (and Hugo Chavez is not the one to thank for this).
Chavez had several journalists illegally executed, he removed what was left of the freedom of speech and was a grade A asskisser for Gaddafi, al-Assad, Castro, Ahmadinejad, Lukashenko and Mugabe. Too bad he died before the Venezuelan people knew.
But had it not been for Chavez, who would have been the beneficiary of that bubble? Venezuela is second only to Canada in the Western Hemisphere on it's gini coefficient. Whatever else Chavez has done, he has narrowed the gap between rich and poor, a result that would not have resulted from increased petroleum revenues without government intervention. In almost every social indicator, Venezuela is a more prosperous, safer, better educated and healthier place now than when he took power. But he accomplished this through demagoguery, nationalization of industry, rigid control of the press, and mandatory food production and price controls.
Unlike the scenes in Pyongyang, however, I believe that the grief exhibited by many Venezuelans will be genuine.
_________________
--James